Concurrent validity of inertial measurement units in range of motion measurements of upper extremity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Wearable technologies Pub Date : 2024-10-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/wtc.2024.6
Jinfeng Li, Fanji Qiu, Liaoyan Gan, Li-Shan Chou
{"title":"Concurrent validity of inertial measurement units in range of motion measurements of upper extremity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jinfeng Li, Fanji Qiu, Liaoyan Gan, Li-Shan Chou","doi":"10.1017/wtc.2024.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inertial measurement units (IMUs) have proven to be valuable tools in measuring the range of motion (RoM) of human upper limb joints. Although several studies have reported on the validity of IMUs compared to the gold standard (optical motion capture system, OMC), a quantitative summary of the accuracy of IMUs in measuring RoM of upper limb joints is still lacking. Thus, the primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the concurrent validity of IMUs for measuring RoM of the upper extremity in adults. Fifty-one articles were included in the systematic review, and data from 16 were pooled for meta-analysis. Concurrent validity is excellent for shoulder flexion-extension (Pearson's <i>r</i> = 0.969 [0.935, 0.986], ICC = 0.935 [0.749, 0.984], mean difference = -3.19 (<i>p</i> = 0.55)), elbow flexion-extension (Pearson's <i>r</i> = 0.954 [0.929, 0.970], ICC = 0.929 [0.814, 0.974], mean difference = 10.61 (<i>p</i> = 0.36)), wrist flexion-extension (Pearson's <i>r</i> = 0.974 [0.945, 0.988], mean difference = -4.20 (<i>p</i> = 0.58)), good to excellent for shoulder abduction-adduction (Pearson's <i>r</i> = 0.919 [0.848, 0.957], ICC = 0.840 [0.430, 0.963], mean difference = -7.10 (<i>p</i> = 0.50)), and elbow pronation-supination (Pearson's <i>r</i> = 0.966 [0.939, 0.981], ICC = 0.821 [0.696, 0.900]). There are some inconsistent results for shoulder internal-external rotation (Pearson's <i>r</i> = 0.939 [0.894, 0.965], mean difference = -9.13 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001)). In conclusion, the results support IMU as a viable instrument for measuring RoM of upper extremity, but for some specific joint movements, such as shoulder rotation and wrist ulnar-radial deviation, IMU measurements need to be used with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":75318,"journal":{"name":"Wearable technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wearable technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wtc.2024.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) have proven to be valuable tools in measuring the range of motion (RoM) of human upper limb joints. Although several studies have reported on the validity of IMUs compared to the gold standard (optical motion capture system, OMC), a quantitative summary of the accuracy of IMUs in measuring RoM of upper limb joints is still lacking. Thus, the primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the concurrent validity of IMUs for measuring RoM of the upper extremity in adults. Fifty-one articles were included in the systematic review, and data from 16 were pooled for meta-analysis. Concurrent validity is excellent for shoulder flexion-extension (Pearson's r = 0.969 [0.935, 0.986], ICC = 0.935 [0.749, 0.984], mean difference = -3.19 (p = 0.55)), elbow flexion-extension (Pearson's r = 0.954 [0.929, 0.970], ICC = 0.929 [0.814, 0.974], mean difference = 10.61 (p = 0.36)), wrist flexion-extension (Pearson's r = 0.974 [0.945, 0.988], mean difference = -4.20 (p = 0.58)), good to excellent for shoulder abduction-adduction (Pearson's r = 0.919 [0.848, 0.957], ICC = 0.840 [0.430, 0.963], mean difference = -7.10 (p = 0.50)), and elbow pronation-supination (Pearson's r = 0.966 [0.939, 0.981], ICC = 0.821 [0.696, 0.900]). There are some inconsistent results for shoulder internal-external rotation (Pearson's r = 0.939 [0.894, 0.965], mean difference = -9.13 (p < 0.0001)). In conclusion, the results support IMU as a viable instrument for measuring RoM of upper extremity, but for some specific joint movements, such as shoulder rotation and wrist ulnar-radial deviation, IMU measurements need to be used with caution.

惯性测量单元在上肢运动范围测量中的并发有效性:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
惯性测量单元(IMU)已被证明是测量人体上肢关节运动范围(RoM)的重要工具。尽管有多项研究报告了惯性测量单元与黄金标准(光学运动捕捉系统,OMC)相比的有效性,但仍缺乏对惯性测量单元测量上肢关节 RoM 的准确性的定量总结。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析的主要目的是确定 IMU 测量成人上肢 RoM 的并发有效性。系统综述共收录了 51 篇文章,并汇总了 16 篇文章的数据进行荟萃分析。肩关节屈伸(Pearson's r = 0.969 [0.935, 0.986],ICC = 0.935 [0.749, 0.984],平均差 = -3.19 (p = 0.55))、肘关节屈伸(Pearson's r = 0.954 [0.929, 0.970],ICC = 0.929 [0.814, 0.974],平均差 = 10.61(P = 0.36))、腕关节屈伸(Pearson's r = 0.974 [0.945, 0.988],平均差 = -4.20 (p = 0.58)),肩关节外展-内收良好至优秀(Pearson's r = 0.919 [0.848, 0.957],ICC = 0.840 [0.430, 0.963],平均差 = -7.10 (p = 0.50))和肘关节前屈-上伸(Pearson's r = 0.966 [0.939, 0.981],ICC = 0.821 [0.696, 0.900])。肩关节内旋-外旋(Pearson's r = 0.939 [0.894, 0.965],平均差 = -9.13 (p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信