Non-opioid psychiatric medications for chronic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2024-10-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpain.2024.1398442
Shahana Ayub, Anil Krishna Bachu, Lakshit Jain, Shanli Parnia, Siddhi Bhivandkar, Rizwan Ahmed, Jasleen Kaur, Surya Karlapati, Sakshi Prasad, Hansini Kochhar, Oghenetega Esther Ayisire, Saloni Mitra, Bikona Ghosh, Sushma Srinivas, Sahar Ashraf, Bhavani Nagendra Papudesi, Palash Kumar Malo, Shoib Sheikh, Michael Hsu, Domenico De Berardis, Saeed Ahmed
{"title":"Non-opioid psychiatric medications for chronic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Shahana Ayub, Anil Krishna Bachu, Lakshit Jain, Shanli Parnia, Siddhi Bhivandkar, Rizwan Ahmed, Jasleen Kaur, Surya Karlapati, Sakshi Prasad, Hansini Kochhar, Oghenetega Esther Ayisire, Saloni Mitra, Bikona Ghosh, Sushma Srinivas, Sahar Ashraf, Bhavani Nagendra Papudesi, Palash Kumar Malo, Shoib Sheikh, Michael Hsu, Domenico De Berardis, Saeed Ahmed","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2024.1398442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The escalating number of deaths related to opioid usage has intensified the pursuit of non-opioid alternatives for managing chronic pain. It's often observed that psychiatric comorbidities coexist in patients suffering from chronic pain. There are a variety of psychotropic medications that have demonstrated effectiveness in treating both psychiatric symptoms and pain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the effectiveness of various psychiatric drugs in managing specific types of chronic pain, including fibromyalgia, neuropathic pain, and chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of five major databases was conducted through February 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met our inclusion criteria, focusing on outpatients Over 18 years of age with chronic pain. The study assessed the effectiveness of duloxetine, mirogabalin, pregabalin, gabapentin, and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), including serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), across various chronic pain conditions such as fibromyalgia, neuropathic pain, and chronic low back pain. The primary outcome measures included pain reduction, improvement in function, and quality of life. Of the 29 RCTs in the systematic review, 20 studies qualified for the meta-analysis. The analysis was stratified by pain type and treatment duration (short-term ≤14 weeks vs. long-term >14 weeks), using Hedge's g standardized mean differences and a random-effects model, along with sensitivity and subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall short-term intervention effect across all studies was significant (SMD -1.45, 95% CI -2.15 to -0.75, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with considerable heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 99%). For fibromyalgia, both duloxetine and mirogabalin demonstrated substantial efficacy with SMDs of -2.42 (95% CI -3.67 to -1.18, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and -2.10 (95% CI -3.28 to -0.92, <i>p</i> = 0.0005), respectively. Conversely, treatments for neuropathic pain and chronic low back pain, including those with amitriptyline and desipramine, did not show significant benefits. The effectiveness of gabapentin could not be conclusively determined due to limited representation in the data. Additionally, no consistent long-term benefits were observed for any of the medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the results of this study underscore the importance of exploring non-opioid alternatives for chronic pain management, particularly in light of the opioid crisis, it is crucial to interpret the findings carefully. Our analysis suggests that certain psychiatric medications, such Duloxetine and mirogabalin demonstrated significant short-term efficacy in fibromyalgia patients. However, their effectiveness in treating neuropathic pain and chronic low back pain was not statistically significant. Additionally, the effectiveness of gabapentin and other medications, such as pregabalin for neuropathic pain, could not be conclusively determined due to limited data and high study heterogeneity. No consistent long-term benefits were observed for any of the drugs studied, raising questions about their sustained efficacy in chronic pain management. These findings highlight the need for further research to understand better the role of psychiatric medications in managing specific chronic pain conditions without prematurely concluding that they are ineffective or unsuitable for these purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11499177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2024.1398442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The escalating number of deaths related to opioid usage has intensified the pursuit of non-opioid alternatives for managing chronic pain. It's often observed that psychiatric comorbidities coexist in patients suffering from chronic pain. There are a variety of psychotropic medications that have demonstrated effectiveness in treating both psychiatric symptoms and pain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the effectiveness of various psychiatric drugs in managing specific types of chronic pain, including fibromyalgia, neuropathic pain, and chronic low back pain.

Methods: A comprehensive search of five major databases was conducted through February 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met our inclusion criteria, focusing on outpatients Over 18 years of age with chronic pain. The study assessed the effectiveness of duloxetine, mirogabalin, pregabalin, gabapentin, and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), including serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), across various chronic pain conditions such as fibromyalgia, neuropathic pain, and chronic low back pain. The primary outcome measures included pain reduction, improvement in function, and quality of life. Of the 29 RCTs in the systematic review, 20 studies qualified for the meta-analysis. The analysis was stratified by pain type and treatment duration (short-term ≤14 weeks vs. long-term >14 weeks), using Hedge's g standardized mean differences and a random-effects model, along with sensitivity and subgroup analyses.

Results: The overall short-term intervention effect across all studies was significant (SMD -1.45, 95% CI -2.15 to -0.75, p < 0.001), with considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 99%). For fibromyalgia, both duloxetine and mirogabalin demonstrated substantial efficacy with SMDs of -2.42 (95% CI -3.67 to -1.18, p < 0.0001) and -2.10 (95% CI -3.28 to -0.92, p = 0.0005), respectively. Conversely, treatments for neuropathic pain and chronic low back pain, including those with amitriptyline and desipramine, did not show significant benefits. The effectiveness of gabapentin could not be conclusively determined due to limited representation in the data. Additionally, no consistent long-term benefits were observed for any of the medications.

Conclusions: While the results of this study underscore the importance of exploring non-opioid alternatives for chronic pain management, particularly in light of the opioid crisis, it is crucial to interpret the findings carefully. Our analysis suggests that certain psychiatric medications, such Duloxetine and mirogabalin demonstrated significant short-term efficacy in fibromyalgia patients. However, their effectiveness in treating neuropathic pain and chronic low back pain was not statistically significant. Additionally, the effectiveness of gabapentin and other medications, such as pregabalin for neuropathic pain, could not be conclusively determined due to limited data and high study heterogeneity. No consistent long-term benefits were observed for any of the drugs studied, raising questions about their sustained efficacy in chronic pain management. These findings highlight the need for further research to understand better the role of psychiatric medications in managing specific chronic pain conditions without prematurely concluding that they are ineffective or unsuitable for these purposes.

治疗慢性疼痛的非阿片类精神药物:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:与阿片类药物使用相关的死亡人数不断攀升,加剧了人们对非阿片类药物替代品治疗慢性疼痛的追求。人们经常发现,慢性疼痛患者同时患有精神疾病。有多种精神药物在治疗精神症状和疼痛方面具有疗效。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估各种精神科药物在治疗特定类型慢性疼痛(包括纤维肌痛、神经性疼痛和慢性腰背痛)方面的有效性:我们在 2023 年 2 月之前对五个主要数据库进行了全面检索,以确定符合我们纳入标准的随机对照试验 (RCT),重点是 18 岁以上的门诊慢性疼痛患者。研究评估了度洛西汀、米罗格巴林、普瑞巴林、加巴喷丁和三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)(包括血清素-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs))在纤维肌痛、神经性疼痛和慢性腰背痛等各种慢性疼痛病症中的疗效。主要研究结果包括疼痛减轻、功能改善和生活质量。在系统综述的 29 项研究中,有 20 项研究符合荟萃分析的要求。分析按照疼痛类型和治疗时间(短期≤14周与长期>14周)进行分层,采用Hedge's g标准化均值差异和随机效应模型,并进行了敏感性分析和亚组分析:结果:所有研究的总体短期干预效果显著(SMD -1.45,95% CI -2.15 至 -0.75,P 2 = 99%)。对于纤维肌痛,度洛西汀和米罗格巴林都显示出显著疗效,SMD分别为-2.42(95% CI -3.67至-1.18,P = 0.0005)。相反,对神经性疼痛和慢性腰背痛的治疗,包括阿米替林和地西泮,并没有显示出显著的疗效。由于数据代表性有限,无法最终确定加巴喷丁的有效性。此外,没有观察到任何一种药物具有持续的长期疗效:虽然本研究的结果强调了探索非阿片类药物替代品治疗慢性疼痛的重要性,尤其是在阿片类药物危机的背景下,但仔细解读研究结果至关重要。我们的分析表明,某些精神科药物,如度洛西汀和米罗格巴林,对纤维肌痛患者有显著的短期疗效。然而,它们在治疗神经性疼痛和慢性腰背痛方面的疗效在统计学上并不显著。此外,由于数据有限和研究的高度异质性,加巴喷丁和其他药物(如普瑞巴林)对神经病理性疼痛的疗效也无法最终确定。所研究的药物均未观察到持续的长期疗效,这使人们对这些药物在慢性疼痛治疗中的持续疗效产生了疑问。这些发现凸显了进一步研究的必要性,以便更好地了解精神科药物在治疗特定慢性疼痛病症中的作用,而不是过早地断定这些药物无效或不适合用于这些目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信