Case Report: Reduction in post-amputation phantom limb pain intensity accompanying the onset of phantom limb telescoping.

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2024-10-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpain.2024.1409352
Andrea Aternali, Heather Lumsden-Ruegg, Lora Appel, Sander L Hitzig, Amanda L Mayo, Joel Katz
{"title":"Case Report: Reduction in post-amputation phantom limb pain intensity accompanying the onset of phantom limb telescoping.","authors":"Andrea Aternali, Heather Lumsden-Ruegg, Lora Appel, Sander L Hitzig, Amanda L Mayo, Joel Katz","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2024.1409352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals with limb loss frequently report post-amputation phenomena, including nonpainful phantom sensations, phantom limb pain (PLP), and residual limb pain (RLP). Although post-amputation pain is common, not all patients benefit from widely accepted treatments. A greater understanding of phantom limb \"telescoping\", the experience of one's phantom hand or foot gradually approaching the residual limb, may assist in developing more effective interventions for reducing post-amputation pain. This case report explores the relationships between PLP, RLP, telescoping, and psychosocial experience in one person with a lower limb amputation. The aim of this case is to illustrate one possible relationship between telescoping and PLP as the mechanisms linking the two remain equivocal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participant is a 35-year-old male who underwent a transfemoral amputation due to a traumatic injury to his right leg approximately 4 years prior. He responded to questionnaires evaluating demographic and health-related information (e.g., age, sex, marital status, reason for amputation), pain and psychological variables via the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-SF), ID Pain Questionnaire (IDPQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PSC-4), Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC2), and Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8) and telescoping, measured by a newly developed app. The participant completed a semi-structured interview that was designed to ascertain patterns in the overlapping experience of phantom limb telescoping and post-amputation pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participant rated his average PLP as 10 on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 (\"no pain\") to 10 (\"worst pain imaginable\") shortly after amputation. Approximately 12 months later, the participant noticed a shortening of his phantom limb, with a concurrent decrease in PLP. At present, his average NRS pain intensity is a 5/10. The participant described how the daily, debilitating PLP intensity diminished to weekly, manageable pain over time. Most notably, his responses on questionnaires were consistent with neuropathic PLP, mild to moderate levels of pain interference, a high level of catastrophic thinking about pain, low optimism, and mild symptoms of anxiety and depression.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this report, telescoping appeared to be preceded by an initial reduction in PLP intensity but these findings are based on a single case report and must be replicated with a large sample size before we have a clearer idea of the relationship between telescoping and PLP. This study provides insight into factors that may maintain PLP, generating targets for further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"5 ","pages":"1409352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2024.1409352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals with limb loss frequently report post-amputation phenomena, including nonpainful phantom sensations, phantom limb pain (PLP), and residual limb pain (RLP). Although post-amputation pain is common, not all patients benefit from widely accepted treatments. A greater understanding of phantom limb "telescoping", the experience of one's phantom hand or foot gradually approaching the residual limb, may assist in developing more effective interventions for reducing post-amputation pain. This case report explores the relationships between PLP, RLP, telescoping, and psychosocial experience in one person with a lower limb amputation. The aim of this case is to illustrate one possible relationship between telescoping and PLP as the mechanisms linking the two remain equivocal.

Methods: The participant is a 35-year-old male who underwent a transfemoral amputation due to a traumatic injury to his right leg approximately 4 years prior. He responded to questionnaires evaluating demographic and health-related information (e.g., age, sex, marital status, reason for amputation), pain and psychological variables via the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-SF), ID Pain Questionnaire (IDPQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PSC-4), Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC2), and Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8) and telescoping, measured by a newly developed app. The participant completed a semi-structured interview that was designed to ascertain patterns in the overlapping experience of phantom limb telescoping and post-amputation pain.

Results: The participant rated his average PLP as 10 on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst pain imaginable") shortly after amputation. Approximately 12 months later, the participant noticed a shortening of his phantom limb, with a concurrent decrease in PLP. At present, his average NRS pain intensity is a 5/10. The participant described how the daily, debilitating PLP intensity diminished to weekly, manageable pain over time. Most notably, his responses on questionnaires were consistent with neuropathic PLP, mild to moderate levels of pain interference, a high level of catastrophic thinking about pain, low optimism, and mild symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Discussion: In this report, telescoping appeared to be preceded by an initial reduction in PLP intensity but these findings are based on a single case report and must be replicated with a large sample size before we have a clearer idea of the relationship between telescoping and PLP. This study provides insight into factors that may maintain PLP, generating targets for further investigation.

病例报告:伴随幻肢伸缩的截肢后幻肢疼痛强度降低。
导言:肢体缺失患者经常会报告截肢后现象,包括非疼痛性幻觉、幻肢痛(PLP)和残肢痛(RLP)。虽然截肢后疼痛很常见,但并非所有患者都能从广泛接受的治疗方法中获益。进一步了解幻肢 "伸缩"(幻觉中的手或脚逐渐接近残肢的体验)可能有助于制定更有效的干预措施,减轻截肢后疼痛。本病例报告探讨了一名下肢截肢患者的幻肢疼痛(PLP)、幻痛(RLP)、伸缩和社会心理体验之间的关系。本病例旨在说明伸缩和PLP之间的一种可能关系,因为两者之间的联系机制仍不明确:被试是一名 35 岁的男性,大约 4 年前因右腿外伤接受了经股截肢手术。他回答了评估人口统计学和健康相关信息的调查问卷(如年龄、性别、婚姻状况、健康状况等)、通过简明疼痛量表 (BPI-SF)、ID 疼痛问卷 (IDPQ)、疼痛灾难化量表 (PSC-4)、患者健康问卷-4 (PHQ-4)、生活取向测试修订版 (LOT-R)、康纳-戴维森复原力量表 (CD-RISC2) 和慢性疼痛接受度问卷 (CPAQ-8),他回答了评估人口统计学和健康相关信息(如年龄、性别、婚姻状况、截肢原因)、疼痛和心理变量的问卷,并通过新开发的应用程序测量了伸缩性。受试者完成了一项半结构化访谈,旨在确定幻肢伸缩和截肢后疼痛重叠体验的模式:结果:在截肢后不久,受试者按照从 0("无痛")到 10("能想象到的最剧烈疼痛")的数字评定量表(NRS)将其幻肢伸缩平均评定为 10。大约 12 个月后,该受试者发现他的幻肢缩短了,PLP 也同时下降。目前,他的平均 NRS 疼痛强度为 5/10。据该患者描述,随着时间的推移,他每天都会感到的令人衰弱的幻肢疼痛强度逐渐减弱为每周都会感到的可控疼痛。最值得注意的是,他在调查问卷上的回答与神经病理性 PLP、轻度至中度疼痛干扰、对疼痛的灾难性思考程度高、乐观程度低以及轻度焦虑和抑郁症状一致:讨论:在本报告中,伸缩似乎先于PLP强度的最初降低,但这些发现是基于单个病例报告,我们必须在更清楚地了解伸缩与PLP之间的关系之前,用大量样本进行重复。本研究深入探讨了可能维持PLP的因素,为进一步研究提供了目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信