Passive Exoskeletons During Live Surgeries: Supporting Forward Head Postures Among Veterinary Surgeons.

Bowen Zheng, Haozhi Chen, Xinsheng Zhou, Sun Young Kim, Denny Yu
{"title":"Passive Exoskeletons During Live Surgeries: Supporting Forward Head Postures Among Veterinary Surgeons.","authors":"Bowen Zheng, Haozhi Chen, Xinsheng Zhou, Sun Young Kim, Denny Yu","doi":"10.1080/24725838.2024.2411552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>TECHNICAL ABSTRACT<b>Background:</b> Musculoskeletal symptoms (MSS) are prevalent among veterinary surgeons. Recent research has proposed exoskeletons as potential solutions in reducing the risk of musculoskeletal disorders among surgeons, but no studies have addressed the neck forward postures (opposite of overhead work), a unique ergonomic neck risk, commonly required during live, open surgery. <b>Purpose:</b> We explored the effectiveness of a passive neck-support exoskeleton during live veterinary surgical procedures with experienced surgeons. <b>Methods:</b> We employed a within-subject crossover design involving surgeons who participated in procedures across specialties including soft tissue and orthopedics. Participants performed entire surgeries with and without a front head posture support prototype exoskeleton, and they completed pre- and post-surgical surveys to assess MSS and perceived effort. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used to compare median values of MSS and the perceived effort of each participant when they operated with and without the exoskeleton. <b>Results:</b> We collected data during 28 procedures involving eight surgeons, with each subject performing at least one surgery with (intervention) and at least one surgery without (control) the exoskeleton (randomized order). The number of control and intervention cases for each participant was balanced. We found that the difference in neck stiffness before and after surgery was greater in the control surgeries compared to when using the exoskeleton intervention. Increases in neck pain and neck stiffness were only observed in control cases, whereas no participant reported increased neck pain or neck stiffness when the exoskeleton was used. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our results indicate that a passive forward head posture support exoskeleton is a promising intervention for reducing the risk of MSS in live surgical procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":73332,"journal":{"name":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2024.2411552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

TECHNICAL ABSTRACTBackground: Musculoskeletal symptoms (MSS) are prevalent among veterinary surgeons. Recent research has proposed exoskeletons as potential solutions in reducing the risk of musculoskeletal disorders among surgeons, but no studies have addressed the neck forward postures (opposite of overhead work), a unique ergonomic neck risk, commonly required during live, open surgery. Purpose: We explored the effectiveness of a passive neck-support exoskeleton during live veterinary surgical procedures with experienced surgeons. Methods: We employed a within-subject crossover design involving surgeons who participated in procedures across specialties including soft tissue and orthopedics. Participants performed entire surgeries with and without a front head posture support prototype exoskeleton, and they completed pre- and post-surgical surveys to assess MSS and perceived effort. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used to compare median values of MSS and the perceived effort of each participant when they operated with and without the exoskeleton. Results: We collected data during 28 procedures involving eight surgeons, with each subject performing at least one surgery with (intervention) and at least one surgery without (control) the exoskeleton (randomized order). The number of control and intervention cases for each participant was balanced. We found that the difference in neck stiffness before and after surgery was greater in the control surgeries compared to when using the exoskeleton intervention. Increases in neck pain and neck stiffness were only observed in control cases, whereas no participant reported increased neck pain or neck stiffness when the exoskeleton was used. Conclusion: Our results indicate that a passive forward head posture support exoskeleton is a promising intervention for reducing the risk of MSS in live surgical procedures.

现场手术中的被动式外骨骼:支持兽医外科医生的头部前倾姿势。
技术摘要 背景:肌肉骨骼症状 (MSS) 在兽医外科医生中十分普遍。最近的研究提出了外骨骼作为降低外科医生肌肉骨骼疾病风险的潜在解决方案,但还没有研究涉及颈部前倾姿势(与高空作业相反),这是一种独特的人体工学颈部风险,通常在现场开放式手术中需要采用。目的:我们与经验丰富的外科医生一起探讨了被动式颈部支撑外骨骼在现场兽医手术过程中的有效性。方法我们采用了受试者内交叉设计,让外科医生参与包括软组织和骨科在内的各科手术。参与者在使用或不使用前头部姿势支撑原型外骨骼的情况下完成整个手术,并完成手术前和手术后调查,以评估 MSS 和感知努力程度。使用 Wilcoxon Signed Rank 检验比较了每位参与者在使用和不使用外骨骼时的 MSS 中位值和感知到的努力程度。结果:我们收集了由八名外科医生参与的 28 例手术中的数据,每位受试者至少进行了一次使用(干预)外骨骼的手术和至少一次未使用(对照)外骨骼的手术(随机顺序)。每位受试者的对照组和干预组病例数量均衡。我们发现,与使用外骨骼干预相比,对照组手术前后颈部僵硬程度的差异更大。只有在对照组病例中才观察到颈部疼痛和颈部僵硬的增加,而在使用外骨骼时,没有参与者报告颈部疼痛或颈部僵硬的增加。结论:我们的研究结果表明,被动式头部前倾姿势支撑外骨骼是一种很有前景的干预措施,可降低现场手术过程中发生 MSS 的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信