Measuring autism with the ADOS-2 using a bifactor model

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Autism Research Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1002/aur.3245
Phebe Albert, Gal Kaldes, Erin Tully, MaryAnn Romski, Robin D. Morris, Rose A. Sevcik, Laura Dilly
{"title":"Measuring autism with the ADOS-2 using a bifactor model","authors":"Phebe Albert,&nbsp;Gal Kaldes,&nbsp;Erin Tully,&nbsp;MaryAnn Romski,&nbsp;Robin D. Morris,&nbsp;Rose A. Sevcik,&nbsp;Laura Dilly","doi":"10.1002/aur.3245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The measurement of autism characteristics can be challenging due to variability of social impairments and restricted and repetitive behaviors or interests (RRBs). Psychometrically strong measures such as the <i>Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition</i> (ADOS-2) can improve our capacity for thorough autism assessment. The conceptualization of the ADOS-2 has been shaped by research exploring the structure of its items, which evaluate autism traits associated with social affect and RRBs. Continuously refining our understanding of these items and their relations to other characteristics, such as cognition, is crucial for more accurate autism assessment and diagnosis. This study used data from a sample of 188 school-age children with mostly average cognitive functioning referred for clinical autism evaluations to (1) test the dimensionality of the ADOS-2, Module 3 (appropriate for children with relatively higher verbal ability), across two sets of items (i.e., algorithm only, algorithm with three non-algorithm RRB items) using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and (2) examine the relations of cognition to the dimensions tested in the ADOS-2. A bifactor model, featuring a general autism trait and two subfactors (RRB and Social Affect), provided superior fit for algorithm-only and algorithm with three non-algorithm items. Cognitive functioning was not significantly related to the general or specific factors in the model with only algorithm items. While the findings support the validity of the ADOS-2, it may not fully capture RRBs among children referred for autism. This study enhances our understanding of the ADOS-2, highlighting the utility of a bifactor model for characterizing its dimensionality, measuring autism traits with minimal cognitive influence, and identifying its limitations in assessing RRBs.</p>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"17 12","pages":"2487-2502"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aur.3245","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The measurement of autism characteristics can be challenging due to variability of social impairments and restricted and repetitive behaviors or interests (RRBs). Psychometrically strong measures such as the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) can improve our capacity for thorough autism assessment. The conceptualization of the ADOS-2 has been shaped by research exploring the structure of its items, which evaluate autism traits associated with social affect and RRBs. Continuously refining our understanding of these items and their relations to other characteristics, such as cognition, is crucial for more accurate autism assessment and diagnosis. This study used data from a sample of 188 school-age children with mostly average cognitive functioning referred for clinical autism evaluations to (1) test the dimensionality of the ADOS-2, Module 3 (appropriate for children with relatively higher verbal ability), across two sets of items (i.e., algorithm only, algorithm with three non-algorithm RRB items) using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and (2) examine the relations of cognition to the dimensions tested in the ADOS-2. A bifactor model, featuring a general autism trait and two subfactors (RRB and Social Affect), provided superior fit for algorithm-only and algorithm with three non-algorithm items. Cognitive functioning was not significantly related to the general or specific factors in the model with only algorithm items. While the findings support the validity of the ADOS-2, it may not fully capture RRBs among children referred for autism. This study enhances our understanding of the ADOS-2, highlighting the utility of a bifactor model for characterizing its dimensionality, measuring autism traits with minimal cognitive influence, and identifying its limitations in assessing RRBs.

使用双因素模型用 ADOS-2 测量自闭症。
由于社交障碍和限制性重复行为或兴趣(RRBs)的多变性,自闭症特征的测量具有挑战性。自闭症诊断观察表第二版(ADOS-2)等心理测量方法具有很强的心理测量功能,可以提高我们对自闭症进行全面评估的能力。ADOS-2的概念是通过对其项目结构的研究形成的,这些项目评估的是与社交情感和RRB相关的自闭症特征。不断完善我们对这些项目及其与认知等其他特征之间关系的理解,对于更准确地进行自闭症评估和诊断至关重要。本研究使用了188名学龄儿童的样本数据,这些儿童的认知功能大多处于平均水平,他们被转介到临床自闭症评估机构进行评估,研究的目的是:(1)使用确证因子分析(CFA)测试ADOS-2模块3(适合语言能力相对较高的儿童)两组项目(即仅有算法的项目,算法与三个非算法RRB项目)的维度;(2)研究认知与ADOS-2测试维度之间的关系。双因素模型包括一个一般自闭症特质和两个子因素(RRB 和社会情感),为纯算法和带有三个非算法项目的算法提供了更好的拟合效果。在只有算法项目的模型中,认知功能与一般或特殊因子的关系并不明显。虽然研究结果支持ADOS-2的有效性,但它可能无法完全反映转诊自闭症儿童的RRB。这项研究加深了我们对ADOS-2的理解,强调了双因素模型在描述其维度特征、测量自闭症特质(认知影响最小)以及识别其在评估RRB方面的局限性方面的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Autism Research
Autism Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AUTISM RESEARCH will cover the developmental disorders known as Pervasive Developmental Disorders (or autism spectrum disorders – ASDs). The Journal focuses on basic genetic, neurobiological and psychological mechanisms and how these influence developmental processes in ASDs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信