COVID-19 and protection measures adopted in rural amazon communities during the first months of the pandemic.

Q3 Medicine
Christian Abizaid, Yoshito Takasaki, Oliver T Coomes
{"title":"COVID-19 and protection measures adopted in rural amazon communities during the first months of the pandemic.","authors":"Christian Abizaid, Yoshito Takasaki, Oliver T Coomes","doi":"10.17843/rpmesp.2024.413.13017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Motivation for the study. To document the evolution of COVID-19 in rural Amazonian populations, which are still little known.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Main findings. COVID-19 spread rapidly through rural communities, initially spreading to mestizo hamlets and later affecting indigenous communities. Rural mortality varied by region and ethnicity. Social distancing was difficult, and travel to receive government vouchers contributed to contagion.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Implications. Identifying the factors that contributed to contagion and the barriers to the adoption of protective measures in rural Amazonian populations will help to face future pandemics.</p><p><strong>Objectives.: </strong>To analyze the evolution of COVID-19 in rural populations of Loreto and Ucayali in the early stage of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods.: </strong>A community-level longitudinal observational study was conducted and based on two rounds of telephone surveys with local authorities of more than 400 indigenous and non-indigenous rural communities in Loreto and Ucayali, in July and August 2020. We collected information on cases and deaths by COVID-19 in their communities, protective measures adopted and if state assistance was received in the early stage of the pandemic. Descriptive statistics allowed us to evaluate the evolution of the pandemic after the initial outbreak and compare the trends of the two regions, as well as between indigenous and non-indigenous populations.</p><p><strong>Results.: </strong>In July 2020, COVID-19 had reached 91.5% of the communities, although deaths from COVID-19 were reported in 13.0% of the communities, with rural mortality being higher in Ucayali (0.111%) than in Loreto (0.047%) and in non-indigenous communities. By August, prevalence decreased from 44.0% to 32.0% of communities, but became more frequent in indigenous communities, and those in Ucayali. Traveling to the city to receive state bonuses and difficulties maintaining social distancing contributed to the spread.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.: </strong>Our findings show the evolution of COVID-19 in rural communities and point to important areas of attention in future public policies, for the adoption of protective measures and reconsidering strategies for the distribution of assistance in the face of future pandemics.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Motivation for the study. To document the evolution of COVID-19 in rural Amazonian populations, which are still little known.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Main findings. COVID-19 spread rapidly through rural communities, initially spreading to mestizo hamlets and later affecting indigenous communities. Rural mortality varied by region and ethnicity. Social distancing was difficult, and travel to receive government vouchers contributed to contagion.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Implications. Identifying the factors that contributed to contagion and the barriers to the adoption of protective measures in rural Amazonian populations will help to face future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":53651,"journal":{"name":"Revista Peruana de Medicina de Experimental y Salud Publica","volume":"41 3","pages":"239-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Peruana de Medicina de Experimental y Salud Publica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2024.413.13017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Motivation for the study. To document the evolution of COVID-19 in rural Amazonian populations, which are still little known.

Background: Main findings. COVID-19 spread rapidly through rural communities, initially spreading to mestizo hamlets and later affecting indigenous communities. Rural mortality varied by region and ethnicity. Social distancing was difficult, and travel to receive government vouchers contributed to contagion.

Background: Implications. Identifying the factors that contributed to contagion and the barriers to the adoption of protective measures in rural Amazonian populations will help to face future pandemics.

Objectives.: To analyze the evolution of COVID-19 in rural populations of Loreto and Ucayali in the early stage of the pandemic.

Materials and methods.: A community-level longitudinal observational study was conducted and based on two rounds of telephone surveys with local authorities of more than 400 indigenous and non-indigenous rural communities in Loreto and Ucayali, in July and August 2020. We collected information on cases and deaths by COVID-19 in their communities, protective measures adopted and if state assistance was received in the early stage of the pandemic. Descriptive statistics allowed us to evaluate the evolution of the pandemic after the initial outbreak and compare the trends of the two regions, as well as between indigenous and non-indigenous populations.

Results.: In July 2020, COVID-19 had reached 91.5% of the communities, although deaths from COVID-19 were reported in 13.0% of the communities, with rural mortality being higher in Ucayali (0.111%) than in Loreto (0.047%) and in non-indigenous communities. By August, prevalence decreased from 44.0% to 32.0% of communities, but became more frequent in indigenous communities, and those in Ucayali. Traveling to the city to receive state bonuses and difficulties maintaining social distancing contributed to the spread.

Conclusions.: Our findings show the evolution of COVID-19 in rural communities and point to important areas of attention in future public policies, for the adoption of protective measures and reconsidering strategies for the distribution of assistance in the face of future pandemics.

Background: Motivation for the study. To document the evolution of COVID-19 in rural Amazonian populations, which are still little known.

Background: Main findings. COVID-19 spread rapidly through rural communities, initially spreading to mestizo hamlets and later affecting indigenous communities. Rural mortality varied by region and ethnicity. Social distancing was difficult, and travel to receive government vouchers contributed to contagion.

Background: Implications. Identifying the factors that contributed to contagion and the barriers to the adoption of protective measures in rural Amazonian populations will help to face future pandemics.

COVID-19 和大流行病最初几个月在亚马逊农村社区采取的保护措施。
背景:研究动机记录亚马孙农村人口中 COVID-19 的演变过程,因为人们对亚马孙农村人口知之甚少:主要发现。COVID-19 在农村社区迅速传播,最初传播到混血小村庄,后来影响到土著社区。农村地区的死亡率因地区和种族而异。社会疏远是困难的,为领取政府代金券而进行的旅行也助长了传染:影响。确定导致传染的因素以及亚马逊农村人口采取保护措施的障碍将有助于应对未来的大流行病:分析大流行初期 COVID-19 在洛雷托和乌卡亚利农村人口中的演变情况:2020 年 7 月和 8 月,我们对洛雷托和乌卡亚利的 400 多个土著和非土著农村社区的地方当局进行了两轮电话调查,在此基础上开展了一项社区级纵向观察研究。我们收集了有关其社区 COVID-19 病例和死亡人数、采取的保护措施以及在疫情初期是否接受国家援助的信息。通过描述性统计,我们可以评估疫情在最初爆发后的演变情况,并比较两个地区以及土著和非土著人口之间的趋势:2020 年 7 月,91.5% 的社区感染了 COVID-19,但有 13.0% 的社区报告有人死于 COVID-19,乌卡亚利的农村死亡率(0.111%)高于洛雷托(0.047%)和非土著社区。到 8 月份,发病率从 44.0%下降到 32.0%,但土著社区和乌卡亚利社区的发病率更高。前往城市领取国家奖金,以及难以保持社会距离,都是导致这一现象蔓延的原因:我们的研究结果表明了 COVID-19 在农村社区的演变情况,并指出了未来公共政策需要关注的重要领域,以采取保护措施,并重新考虑未来大流行病的援助分配战略:研究动机。记录 COVID-19 在亚马逊农村地区人群中的演变过程:主要发现。COVID-19 在农村社区迅速传播,最初蔓延到混血小村庄,后来影响到土著社区。农村地区的死亡率因地区和种族而异。社会疏远是困难的,为领取政府代金券而进行的旅行也助长了传染:影响。确定导致传染的因素以及亚马逊农村人口采取保护措施的障碍将有助于应对未来的流行病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Peruana de Medicina de Experimental y Salud Publica
Revista Peruana de Medicina de Experimental y Salud Publica Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública (RPMESP) es el órgano oficial de difusión científica del Instituto Nacional de Salud (INS) del Perú. Es una publicación arbitrada por pares, de periodicidad trimestral, de ámbito y difusión mundial, indizada en MEDLINE/Index Medicos, SCOPUS, EMBASE, SciELO Salud Pública y otras bases de datos internacionales. La RPMESP es distribuida en su versión impresa y electrónica, con acceso gratuito a texto completo. La RPMESP publica artículos referidos a temas del ámbito biomédico y de salud pública, resaltando aportes prácticos, que contribuyan a mejorar la situación de salud del país y de la región. Propicia el intercambio de la experiencia científica en salud entre instituciones y personas dedicadas a la investigación dentro y fuera del Perú a fin de promover el avance y la aplicación de la investigación en salud.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信