Return to Physical Activity in Individuals with Surgical Stomas: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.2 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Sports Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.3390/sports12100273
Andrea-Victoria Mena-Jiménez, Claudio-Alberto Rodríguez-Suárez, Héctor González-de la Torre
{"title":"Return to Physical Activity in Individuals with Surgical Stomas: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Andrea-Victoria Mena-Jiménez, Claudio-Alberto Rodríguez-Suárez, Héctor González-de la Torre","doi":"10.3390/sports12100273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In surgically treated individuals with surgical stomas, the return to physical activity is an indicator of quality of life that reflects their well-being. With the aim of synthesizing the available evidence regarding the return to physical activity in individuals with surgical stomas, a scoping review was developed following the methodological approach of the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews criteria. Searches were conducted in Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, Cinahl, and Lilacs, as well as the meta-search engines TripDatabase and Epistemonikos, using MeSH terms. Included studies were written in Spanish, English, Portuguese, and German, without any limitation on the year of publication. A total of <i>n</i> = 15 studies was included (<i>n</i> = 2 qualitative; <i>n</i> = 2 case reports; <i>n</i> = 1 case series; <i>n</i> = 1 cohort; <i>n</i> = 8 cross-sectional; and <i>n</i> = 1 randomized clinical trial), which showed variability in the quality of the designs. The qualitative studies explored themes such as motivation, beliefs about physical activity, and other lifestyle factors. The case reports described physiological, psychological, and functional implications of returning to physical activity for specific individuals after ostomy surgery. Quantitative studies evaluated the effects of different types of physical activity on quality of life and tolerance to physical activity in these individuals, employing various measurement instruments. In conclusion, the evidence on returning to sports and physical activity after stoma surgery is limited and varied. While studies highlight the importance of social support and self-confidence, they generally lack rigor and primarily focus on adults and oncology patients. There is a need for more research to establish clear guidelines on physical activity type, frequency, and intensity to ensure safe and beneficial outcomes for individuals with stomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"12 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11511191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12100273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In surgically treated individuals with surgical stomas, the return to physical activity is an indicator of quality of life that reflects their well-being. With the aim of synthesizing the available evidence regarding the return to physical activity in individuals with surgical stomas, a scoping review was developed following the methodological approach of the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews criteria. Searches were conducted in Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, Cinahl, and Lilacs, as well as the meta-search engines TripDatabase and Epistemonikos, using MeSH terms. Included studies were written in Spanish, English, Portuguese, and German, without any limitation on the year of publication. A total of n = 15 studies was included (n = 2 qualitative; n = 2 case reports; n = 1 case series; n = 1 cohort; n = 8 cross-sectional; and n = 1 randomized clinical trial), which showed variability in the quality of the designs. The qualitative studies explored themes such as motivation, beliefs about physical activity, and other lifestyle factors. The case reports described physiological, psychological, and functional implications of returning to physical activity for specific individuals after ostomy surgery. Quantitative studies evaluated the effects of different types of physical activity on quality of life and tolerance to physical activity in these individuals, employing various measurement instruments. In conclusion, the evidence on returning to sports and physical activity after stoma surgery is limited and varied. While studies highlight the importance of social support and self-confidence, they generally lack rigor and primarily focus on adults and oncology patients. There is a need for more research to establish clear guidelines on physical activity type, frequency, and intensity to ensure safe and beneficial outcomes for individuals with stomas.

手术造口患者恢复体育锻炼:范围审查。
对于接受过手术治疗的手术造口患者来说,恢复体力活动是反映其生活质量的一项指标。为了综合有关手术造口患者恢复体力活动的现有证据,我们按照乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的方法论和《系统综述和元分析的首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews)的标准进行了范围界定综述。使用 MeSH 术语在 Medline (PubMed)、Scopus、Web of Science、Cinahl 和 Lilacs 以及元搜索引擎 TripDatabase 和 Epistemonikos 中进行了检索。所纳入的研究均以西班牙语、英语、葡萄牙语和德语撰写,出版年份不限。共纳入 n = 15 项研究(n = 2 项定性研究;n = 2 项病例报告;n = 1 项系列病例;n = 1 项队列研究;n = 8 项横断面研究;n = 1 项随机临床试验),这些研究的设计质量参差不齐。定性研究探讨了体育锻炼的动机、信念和其他生活方式因素等主题。病例报告描述了造口手术后恢复体育锻炼对特定个体的生理、心理和功能影响。定量研究采用各种测量工具,评估了不同类型的体育活动对这些人的生活质量和体育活动耐受性的影响。总之,有关造口手术后重返运动和体育锻炼的证据有限且多种多样。虽然研究强调了社会支持和自信心的重要性,但这些研究普遍缺乏严谨性,而且主要侧重于成人和肿瘤患者。有必要开展更多研究,为体育活动的类型、频率和强度制定明确的指导方针,以确保造口患者获得安全有益的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信