PROGRESS: A Patient-centered Engagement Infrastructure and Multi-level Approach to Enrich Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in a National Randomized Online Behavioral Pain Treatment Study.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jessica Clifton, Emma Adair, Matthias Cheung, Calia Torres, Wendy Andrews, Brittany Dorsonne, Arayam Y Hailu, Elizabeth Heggan, Jackie Miefert, Gabrielle Riazi, Troy C Dildine, Shelly Spears, Regina Greer-Smith, Ting Pun, Neely Williams, Luzmercy Perez, Heather P King, Maisa S Ziadni, Sean Mackey, Beth D Darnall
{"title":"PROGRESS: A Patient-centered Engagement Infrastructure and Multi-level Approach to Enrich Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in a National Randomized Online Behavioral Pain Treatment Study.","authors":"Jessica Clifton, Emma Adair, Matthias Cheung, Calia Torres, Wendy Andrews, Brittany Dorsonne, Arayam Y Hailu, Elizabeth Heggan, Jackie Miefert, Gabrielle Riazi, Troy C Dildine, Shelly Spears, Regina Greer-Smith, Ting Pun, Neely Williams, Luzmercy Perez, Heather P King, Maisa S Ziadni, Sean Mackey, Beth D Darnall","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Twenty percent of individuals experience chronic pain worldwide posing significant challenges to those living with it. Pain research is crucial for developing and characterizing effective strategies to reduce the burden of chronic pain. Traditional research approaches often yield homogeneous study samples that poorly generalize and have unknown applicability across diverse patient populations. The Pain Relief with Online Groups that Empower Skills-based Symptom Reduction (PROGRESS) study aims to address disparities in pain research engagement and patient outcomes through the intentional inclusion of people with varied backgrounds and experiences of pain, and through a multilevel design informed by diverse stakeholder recommendations. The composition of three advisory boards (Patient Engagement and Diversity Board, Local Patient Advisory Board, and the National Patient Advisory Panel) prioritized diversity in patient/expert advisor background, geographic location, race, and ethnicity. Our engagement approach aligns with the Foundational Expectations for Partnerships in Research by Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), which emphasizes diverse representation, early and ongoing engagement, dedicated funds for advisor compensation, collaborative decision making, meaningful participation, and continuous assessment. The first 24 months of study advisor engagement has yielded multiple recruitment strategies resulting in a study population enriched with a breadth of identities within PROGRESS (e.g., inclusive patient-facing materials). Lessons learned underscore the importance of investing time in building patient and stakeholder relationships, trust, and embracing diverse viewpoints amongst the study team. PROGRESS demonstrates the potential of diverse patient-centered engagement to support evidence-based outcomes and practices that are more inclusive, equitable, and representative of the broader population. PERSPECTIVE: The PROGRESS study demonstrates how diverse patient engagement and inclusive advisory boards enhance research outcomes. By aligning with PCORI standards and employing innovative recruitment strategies, it highlights the vital role of stakeholder relationships and diverse perspectives. Key lessons learned emphasize adaptive strategies and continuous feedback for advancing equitable pain research.</p>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104718","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Twenty percent of individuals experience chronic pain worldwide posing significant challenges to those living with it. Pain research is crucial for developing and characterizing effective strategies to reduce the burden of chronic pain. Traditional research approaches often yield homogeneous study samples that poorly generalize and have unknown applicability across diverse patient populations. The Pain Relief with Online Groups that Empower Skills-based Symptom Reduction (PROGRESS) study aims to address disparities in pain research engagement and patient outcomes through the intentional inclusion of people with varied backgrounds and experiences of pain, and through a multilevel design informed by diverse stakeholder recommendations. The composition of three advisory boards (Patient Engagement and Diversity Board, Local Patient Advisory Board, and the National Patient Advisory Panel) prioritized diversity in patient/expert advisor background, geographic location, race, and ethnicity. Our engagement approach aligns with the Foundational Expectations for Partnerships in Research by Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), which emphasizes diverse representation, early and ongoing engagement, dedicated funds for advisor compensation, collaborative decision making, meaningful participation, and continuous assessment. The first 24 months of study advisor engagement has yielded multiple recruitment strategies resulting in a study population enriched with a breadth of identities within PROGRESS (e.g., inclusive patient-facing materials). Lessons learned underscore the importance of investing time in building patient and stakeholder relationships, trust, and embracing diverse viewpoints amongst the study team. PROGRESS demonstrates the potential of diverse patient-centered engagement to support evidence-based outcomes and practices that are more inclusive, equitable, and representative of the broader population. PERSPECTIVE: The PROGRESS study demonstrates how diverse patient engagement and inclusive advisory boards enhance research outcomes. By aligning with PCORI standards and employing innovative recruitment strategies, it highlights the vital role of stakeholder relationships and diverse perspectives. Key lessons learned emphasize adaptive strategies and continuous feedback for advancing equitable pain research.

进展:以患者为中心的参与基础架构和多层次方法,在全国随机在线行为疼痛治疗研究中丰富多样性、公平性和包容性。
世界上有 20% 的人经历过慢性疼痛,这给患者带来了巨大的挑战。疼痛研究对于制定和描述减轻慢性疼痛负担的有效策略至关重要。传统的研究方法往往产生同质化的研究样本,不能很好地概括不同患者群体的情况,其适用性也不得而知。以技能为基础减少症状的在线小组缓解疼痛(PROGRESS)研究旨在通过有意识地纳入具有不同背景和疼痛经历的人群,并根据不同利益相关者的建议进行多层次设计,从而解决疼痛研究参与度和患者治疗效果方面的差异。三个顾问委员会(患者参与和多样性委员会、地方患者顾问委员会和全国患者顾问小组)的组成优先考虑了患者/专家顾问背景、地理位置、种族和民族的多样性。我们的参与方式与患者为中心的结果研究所(PCORI)的 "研究合作基本期望 "相一致,该期望强调多元化代表、早期和持续参与、顾问报酬专项资金、合作决策、有意义的参与和持续评估。研究顾问参与的前 24 个月采取了多种招募策略,使研究人群在 PROGRESS(例如,面向患者的包容性材料)中具有广泛的身份。汲取的经验教训强调了投入时间建立患者和利益相关者关系、信任以及在研究团队中接受不同观点的重要性。PROGRESS 证明了以患者为中心的多元化参与在支持循证结果和实践方面的潜力,这些结果和实践更具包容性、公平性,并能代表更广泛的人群。观点:"进展 "研究展示了多元化患者参与和包容性咨询委员会如何提高研究成果。通过与 PCORI 标准保持一致并采用创新的招募策略,该研究强调了利益相关者关系和多元化观点的重要作用。获得的主要经验教训强调了推进公平疼痛研究的适应性策略和持续反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信