Delays in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Defibrillation, and Epinephrine Administration in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - Composite Time-Dependent Effects of Prehospital Interventions on 30-Day Favorable Neurological Outcomes and Social Implications From a Prospective Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Toshihide Izumida, Teruhiko Imamura, Shizukiyo Ishikawa, Nikhil Narang, Koichiro Kinugawa, Naohiro Yonemoto, Yoshio Tahara, Takanori Ikeda
{"title":"Delays in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Defibrillation, and Epinephrine Administration in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - Composite Time-Dependent Effects of Prehospital Interventions on 30-Day Favorable Neurological Outcomes and Social Implications From a Prospective Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.","authors":"Toshihide Izumida, Teruhiko Imamura, Shizukiyo Ishikawa, Nikhil Narang, Koichiro Kinugawa, Naohiro Yonemoto, Yoshio Tahara, Takanori Ikeda","doi":"10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our study investigated the prognostic impacts of the interval between collapse and the initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and subsequent intervals to defibrillation or epinephrine administration, on 30-day favorable neurological outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This nationwide population-based cohort study used the All Japan Utstein Registry, encompassing OHCA patients in Japan between January 2006 and December 2021. The primary outcome was 30-day favorable neurological outcomes, defined as Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2. Three-dimensional plots and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the time-dependent prognostic impacts of prehospital CPR interventions. In all, 184,731 OHCA patients (86,246 with shockable rhythm and 98,485 with non-shockable rhythm) were included in the study. Three-dimensional plots revealed that the interval between collapse and initiation of CPR, and subsequent intervals to defibrillation or epinephrine, were independently associated with 30-day favorable neurological outcomes in the groups with shockable and non-shockable rhythms, respectively (P<0.05 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with witnessed OHCA, there was a dose-response relationship between delays in the collapse-CPR initiation interval, and subsequent intervals to defibrillation or epinephrine administration, and 30-day favorable neurological outcomes. Our findings provide valuable insights into OHCA management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50691,"journal":{"name":"Circulation Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0638","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Our study investigated the prognostic impacts of the interval between collapse and the initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and subsequent intervals to defibrillation or epinephrine administration, on 30-day favorable neurological outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Methods and results: This nationwide population-based cohort study used the All Japan Utstein Registry, encompassing OHCA patients in Japan between January 2006 and December 2021. The primary outcome was 30-day favorable neurological outcomes, defined as Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2. Three-dimensional plots and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the time-dependent prognostic impacts of prehospital CPR interventions. In all, 184,731 OHCA patients (86,246 with shockable rhythm and 98,485 with non-shockable rhythm) were included in the study. Three-dimensional plots revealed that the interval between collapse and initiation of CPR, and subsequent intervals to defibrillation or epinephrine, were independently associated with 30-day favorable neurological outcomes in the groups with shockable and non-shockable rhythms, respectively (P<0.05 for all).

Conclusions: Among patients with witnessed OHCA, there was a dose-response relationship between delays in the collapse-CPR initiation interval, and subsequent intervals to defibrillation or epinephrine administration, and 30-day favorable neurological outcomes. Our findings provide valuable insights into OHCA management.

院外心脏骤停患者心肺复苏、除颤和肾上腺素给药的延迟--一项前瞻性全国人群队列研究中院前干预对 30 天良好神经系统预后的时间依赖性综合影响及其社会意义。
研究背景我们的研究调查了院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者从昏迷到开始心肺复苏(CPR)之间的时间间隔以及随后的除颤或肾上腺素给药时间间隔对30天良好神经功能预后的影响:这项基于全国人口的队列研究使用了全日本乌特斯坦登记系统,涵盖了 2006 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月间日本的 OHCA 患者。研究的主要结果是30天的良好神经功能预后,定义为大脑功能1级或2级。三维图和多变量逻辑回归模型用于评估院前心肺复苏干预对预后的时间依赖性影响。研究共纳入了 184731 名 OHCA 患者(其中 86246 人为可电击心律,98485 人为不可电击心律)。三维图显示,在可电击心律组和不可电击心律组中,昏迷与开始心肺复苏之间的时间间隔以及随后除颤或肾上腺素的时间间隔分别与30天良好的神经功能预后独立相关(PC结论:在目击的OHCA患者中,可电击心律组和不可电击心律组的30天良好神经功能预后分别与昏迷与开始心肺复苏之间的时间间隔以及随后除颤或肾上腺素的时间间隔独立相关:在有目击者的 OHCA 患者中,昏迷-CPR 启动间隔的延迟、随后的除颤或肾上腺素给药间隔与 30 天良好神经功能预后之间存在剂量-反应关系。我们的研究结果为 OHCA 的管理提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation Journal
Circulation Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
471
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Circulation publishes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other content related to cardiovascular health and disease, including observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services and outcomes studies, and advances in basic and translational research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信