Kristin Helene Skullerud, Petter Gjersvik, Malin Eberhard-Gran, Are Hugo Pripp, Erik Qvigstad, Siri Vangen, Anne Lise Ording Helgesen
{"title":"Sexual Distress and Quality of Life in Women With Genital Erosive Lichen Planus-A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Kristin Helene Skullerud, Petter Gjersvik, Malin Eberhard-Gran, Are Hugo Pripp, Erik Qvigstad, Siri Vangen, Anne Lise Ording Helgesen","doi":"10.1097/LGT.0000000000000847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to assess sexual distress and quality of life in women with moderate-to-severe genital erosive lichen planus (GELP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-six women with GELP were recruited at the Oslo University Hospital in Norway. The diagnosis was confirmed by a dermatologist with experience in vulvovaginal disease and based on characteristic clinical changes in the vulva and/or vagina, and biopsy results if available. Clinical severity was measured using the GELP score with a score ≥5 required for inclusion. Sexual distress was measured using the revised Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS-R), and quality of life was measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Topical steroid treatment was allowed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean FSDS-R score was 22.7 (range 0-45) with 27 women reporting high scores for sexual distress (FSDS-R score >15). The mean DLQI score was 8.8 (range 1-19) with 15 women reporting a moderate impact (DLQI score 6-10), and 12 women reporting a very large impact (DLQI score 11-20) of GELP on their quality of life. No clear correlations were found between disease severity assessed by GELP scores and FSDS-R or DLQI scores. Age was not correlated with FSDS-R or DLQI scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results demonstrate that a substantial number of women with GELP experience sexual distress and a reduced quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":50160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000847","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The study aimed to assess sexual distress and quality of life in women with moderate-to-severe genital erosive lichen planus (GELP).
Materials and methods: Thirty-six women with GELP were recruited at the Oslo University Hospital in Norway. The diagnosis was confirmed by a dermatologist with experience in vulvovaginal disease and based on characteristic clinical changes in the vulva and/or vagina, and biopsy results if available. Clinical severity was measured using the GELP score with a score ≥5 required for inclusion. Sexual distress was measured using the revised Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS-R), and quality of life was measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Topical steroid treatment was allowed.
Results: The mean FSDS-R score was 22.7 (range 0-45) with 27 women reporting high scores for sexual distress (FSDS-R score >15). The mean DLQI score was 8.8 (range 1-19) with 15 women reporting a moderate impact (DLQI score 6-10), and 12 women reporting a very large impact (DLQI score 11-20) of GELP on their quality of life. No clear correlations were found between disease severity assessed by GELP scores and FSDS-R or DLQI scores. Age was not correlated with FSDS-R or DLQI scores.
Conclusions: These results demonstrate that a substantial number of women with GELP experience sexual distress and a reduced quality of life.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the source for the latest science about benign and malignant conditions of the cervix, vagina, vulva, and anus.
The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original research original research that addresses prevalence, causes, mechanisms, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of lower genital tract disease. We publish clinical guidelines, position papers, cost-effectiveness analyses, narrative reviews, and systematic reviews, including meta-analyses. We also publish papers about research and reporting methods, opinions about controversial medical issues. Of particular note, we encourage material in any of the above mentioned categories that is related to improving patient care, avoiding medical errors, and comparative effectiveness research. We encourage publication of evidence-based guidelines, diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, and decision aids. Original research and reviews may be sub-classified according to topic: cervix and HPV, vulva and vagina, perianal and anal, basic science, and education and learning.
The scope and readership of the journal extend to several disciplines: gynecology, internal medicine, family practice, dermatology, physical therapy, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, sex therapy, and pharmacology. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease highlights needs for future research, and enhances health care.
The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the official journal of the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease, and the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy, and sponsored by the Australian Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and the Society of Canadian Colposcopists.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
