Childhood maltreatment, cognitive performance, and cognitive decline in middle-aged and older adults with chronic disease: A prospective study

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
{"title":"Childhood maltreatment, cognitive performance, and cognitive decline in middle-aged and older adults with chronic disease: A prospective study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Childhood maltreatment (CM) may increase the risk for cognitive deficits and dementia later in life. However, most research has been cross-sectional in nature, has typically focused on specific types of CM, and rarely examined individual differences. The objectives are to evaluate 1) if CM predicts poorer cognitive performance and greater cognitive decline over a 5-year follow-up in older men and women with coronary artery disease (CAD) or other non-cardiovascular (non-CVD) chronic disease, and whether 2) sex and CAD status influence these relations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Men and women (<em>N</em> = 1254; 39.6 % women; 65.6 ± 7.0 years old) with CAD or other non-CVD chronic diseases completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire Short Form (CTQ-SF). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was administered twice at 5-year intervals. Main analyses included bivariate correlations, hierarchical analyses and moderation analyses controlling for sociodemographic and health parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CM was experienced by 32 % of the sample, while scores suggestive of cognitive deficits were obtained by 32.7 % and 40.2 % at study onset and follow-up, respectively. CM was associated with significantly lower MoCA scores at study onset (b = −0.013, <em>p</em> = 0.020), but not with change in MoCA over time (b = −0.002, <em>p</em> = 0.796). While MoCA scores did differ as a function of sex and CAD status, the latter did not influence the relations between maltreatment and MoCA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CM predicted poorer cognitive functioning among older individuals with chronic diseases but did not play a role in any further cognitive decline over the follow-up period. Further research is needed to help understand the mechanisms implicated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924003775","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Childhood maltreatment (CM) may increase the risk for cognitive deficits and dementia later in life. However, most research has been cross-sectional in nature, has typically focused on specific types of CM, and rarely examined individual differences. The objectives are to evaluate 1) if CM predicts poorer cognitive performance and greater cognitive decline over a 5-year follow-up in older men and women with coronary artery disease (CAD) or other non-cardiovascular (non-CVD) chronic disease, and whether 2) sex and CAD status influence these relations.

Methods

Men and women (N = 1254; 39.6 % women; 65.6 ± 7.0 years old) with CAD or other non-CVD chronic diseases completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire Short Form (CTQ-SF). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was administered twice at 5-year intervals. Main analyses included bivariate correlations, hierarchical analyses and moderation analyses controlling for sociodemographic and health parameters.

Results

CM was experienced by 32 % of the sample, while scores suggestive of cognitive deficits were obtained by 32.7 % and 40.2 % at study onset and follow-up, respectively. CM was associated with significantly lower MoCA scores at study onset (b = −0.013, p = 0.020), but not with change in MoCA over time (b = −0.002, p = 0.796). While MoCA scores did differ as a function of sex and CAD status, the latter did not influence the relations between maltreatment and MoCA.

Conclusions

CM predicted poorer cognitive functioning among older individuals with chronic diseases but did not play a role in any further cognitive decline over the follow-up period. Further research is needed to help understand the mechanisms implicated.
患有慢性疾病的中老年人的童年虐待、认知表现和认知能力下降:一项前瞻性研究。
目的:童年虐待(CM)可能会增加日后出现认知障碍和痴呆症的风险。然而,大多数研究都是横断面研究,通常侧重于特定类型的儿童虐待,很少研究个体差异。本研究的目的是评估:1)冠状动脉疾病(CAD)或其他非心血管疾病(non-cardiovascular (non-CVD))慢性疾病老年男性和女性患者在 5 年随访期间,CM 是否预示着较差的认知表现和较大的认知衰退;2)性别和 CAD 状态是否影响这些关系:患有冠状动脉疾病或其他非心血管疾病慢性病的男性和女性(N = 1254;39.6% 为女性;65.6 ± 7.0 岁)填写了儿童创伤问卷简表(CTQ-SF)。蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)每隔 5 年进行两次。主要分析包括双变量相关性分析、层次分析以及控制社会人口学和健康参数的调节分析:32%的样本患有CM,32.7%和40.2%的样本在研究开始和随访时分别获得了提示认知障碍的分数。在研究开始时,CM 与较低的 MoCA 分数明显相关(b = -0.013,p = 0.020),但与 MoCA 随时间的变化无关(b = -0.002,p = 0.796)。虽然MoCA得分因性别和CAD状态而异,但后者并不影响虐待与MoCA之间的关系:CM预示着患有慢性疾病的老年人认知功能较差,但在随访期间并没有导致认知功能进一步下降。需要进一步研究以帮助了解其中的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信