Analysis of Voice Quality in Children With Smith-Magenis Syndrome.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Rafael Martínez-Olalla, Irene Hidalgo-De la Guía, Elena Gayarzábal-Heinze, Raúl Fernández-Ruiz, Esther Núñez-Vidal, Agustín Álvarez-Marquina, Daniel Palacios-Alonso
{"title":"Analysis of Voice Quality in Children With Smith-Magenis Syndrome.","authors":"Rafael Martínez-Olalla, Irene Hidalgo-De la Guía, Elena Gayarzábal-Heinze, Raúl Fernández-Ruiz, Esther Núñez-Vidal, Agustín Álvarez-Marquina, Daniel Palacios-Alonso","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.09.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The production of phonation involves very complex processes, linked to the physical, clinical, and emotional state of the speaker. Thus, in populations with neurological diseases, it is possible to find the imprint in the voice signal left by the deterioration of certain cortical areas or part of the neurocognitive mechanisms that are involved in speech. In previous works, the authors determined the relationship between the pathological characteristics of the voice of the speakers with Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS) and a lower value in the cepstral peak prominence (CPP) with respect to normative speakers. They also described the presence of subharmonics in their voices.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study aims to verify whether both characteristics can be used simultaneously to differentiate SMS voices from neurotypical voices. It will also be analyzed if there is variation in the trajectory of the formants coinciding with the subharmonics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To do this, the effect of subharmonics in the voices of 12 SMS individuals was isolated to see if they were responsible for the lower CPP values. An evaluation of the CPP was also carried out in the areas of subharmonic presence, from the peak that reflected the value of f0, rather than using the most prominent peak. This offered us a baseline for the CPP value in the presence of subharmonics. It was checked if changes in the formants occurred synchronously to the appearance of those subharmonics. If so, the muscles that control the position of the jaw and tongue would be affected at the same time as the larynx. The latter was difficult to observe since the samples were very short. A comparison of phonatory performance of a sustained /a/ between a normotypical group and non-normotypical group of children was carried out. These groups were balanced and matched in age and gender. The Spanish Association of Smith-Magenis Syndrome (ASME) provides almost 20% of the population in Spain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CPP allows differentiating between normative speakers and those with SMS, even when isolating the effect of subharmonics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CPP is a robust index for determining the degree of dysphonia. It makes it possible to differentiate pathological voices from healthy voices even when subharmonics are present. The presence of subharmonics is a characteristic of voices of SMS individuals and is not present in healthy ones. Both indexes can be used simultaneously to differentiate SMS voices from neurotypical voices.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.09.026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The production of phonation involves very complex processes, linked to the physical, clinical, and emotional state of the speaker. Thus, in populations with neurological diseases, it is possible to find the imprint in the voice signal left by the deterioration of certain cortical areas or part of the neurocognitive mechanisms that are involved in speech. In previous works, the authors determined the relationship between the pathological characteristics of the voice of the speakers with Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS) and a lower value in the cepstral peak prominence (CPP) with respect to normative speakers. They also described the presence of subharmonics in their voices.

Objectives: The present study aims to verify whether both characteristics can be used simultaneously to differentiate SMS voices from neurotypical voices. It will also be analyzed if there is variation in the trajectory of the formants coinciding with the subharmonics.

Methods: To do this, the effect of subharmonics in the voices of 12 SMS individuals was isolated to see if they were responsible for the lower CPP values. An evaluation of the CPP was also carried out in the areas of subharmonic presence, from the peak that reflected the value of f0, rather than using the most prominent peak. This offered us a baseline for the CPP value in the presence of subharmonics. It was checked if changes in the formants occurred synchronously to the appearance of those subharmonics. If so, the muscles that control the position of the jaw and tongue would be affected at the same time as the larynx. The latter was difficult to observe since the samples were very short. A comparison of phonatory performance of a sustained /a/ between a normotypical group and non-normotypical group of children was carried out. These groups were balanced and matched in age and gender. The Spanish Association of Smith-Magenis Syndrome (ASME) provides almost 20% of the population in Spain.

Results: The CPP allows differentiating between normative speakers and those with SMS, even when isolating the effect of subharmonics.

Conclusions: The CPP is a robust index for determining the degree of dysphonia. It makes it possible to differentiate pathological voices from healthy voices even when subharmonics are present. The presence of subharmonics is a characteristic of voices of SMS individuals and is not present in healthy ones. Both indexes can be used simultaneously to differentiate SMS voices from neurotypical voices.

史密斯-马盖尼综合征患儿的嗓音质量分析
语音的产生涉及非常复杂的过程,与说话者的身体、临床和情绪状态有关。因此,在患有神经系统疾病的人群中,有可能在语音信号中发现因某些皮质区域或部分神经认知机制退化而留下的印记,而这些区域或机制与语音有关。在之前的研究中,作者确定了史密斯-马盖尼综合征(SMS)患者嗓音的病理特征与倒频峰突出(CPP)值低于正常人之间的关系。他们还描述了嗓音中存在的次谐波:本研究旨在验证这两个特征是否可同时用于区分 SMS 声音和神经质声音。本研究还将分析与次谐波重合的声母轨迹是否存在变化:为此,我们分离了 12 个 SMS 患者声音中的次谐波,以确定次谐波是否是导致 CPP 值降低的原因。此外,我们还从反映 f0 值的峰值开始,而不是使用最突出的峰值,对存在次谐波的区域进行了 CPP 评估。这为我们提供了存在次谐波时的 CPP 值基线。我们还检查了声母的变化是否与这些次谐波的出现同步。如果是,那么控制下颌和舌头位置的肌肉将与喉部同时受到影响。由于样本很短,因此很难观察到后者。我们比较了正常类型组和非正常类型组儿童的持续 /a/ 的发音表现。这两组儿童在年龄和性别上是平衡和匹配的。西班牙史密斯-马盖尼综合症协会(ASME)的患儿占西班牙总人口的近 20%:结果:CPP 可以区分正常说话者和 SMS 患者,即使在隔离次谐波影响的情况下也是如此:结论:CPP 是确定发音障碍程度的可靠指标。结论:CPP 是确定发音障碍程度的可靠指标,即使在存在次谐波的情况下,它也能区分病态发声和健康发声。亚谐波的存在是 SMS 患者嗓音的一个特征,而健康患者的嗓音则不存在亚谐波。这两个指标可同时用于区分 SMS 声音和神经典型声音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信