H Auguste Dutcher, James Hose, Hollis Howe, Julie Rojas, Audrey P Gasch
{"title":"The response to single-gene duplication implicates translation as a key vulnerability in aneuploid yeast.","authors":"H Auguste Dutcher, James Hose, Hollis Howe, Julie Rojas, Audrey P Gasch","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgen.1011454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aneuploidy produces myriad consequences in health and disease, yet models of the deleterious effects of chromosome amplification are still widely debated. To distinguish the molecular determinants of aneuploidy stress, we measured the effects of duplicating individual genes in cells with different chromosome duplications, in wild-type cells (SSD1+) and cells sensitized to aneuploidy by deletion of RNA-binding protein Ssd1 (ssd1Δ). We identified gene duplications that are nearly neutral in wild-type euploid cells but significantly deleterious in euploids lacking SSD1 or in SSD1+ aneuploid cells with different chromosome duplications. Several of the most deleterious genes are linked to translation. In contrast, duplication of other genes benefits multiple ssd1Δ aneuploids over controls, and this group is enriched for translational effectors. Furthermore, both wild-type and especially ssd1Δ aneuploids with different chromosome amplifications show increased sensitivity to translational inhibitor nourseothricin. We used comparative modeling of aneuploid growth defects, based on the cumulative fitness costs measured for single-gene duplication. Our results present a model in which the deleterious effects of aneuploidy emerge from an interaction between the cumulative burden of many amplified genes on a chromosome and a subset of duplicated genes that become toxic in that context. These findings provide a perspective on the dual impact of individual genes and overall genomic burden, offering new avenues for understanding aneuploidy and its cellular consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":49007,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Genetics","volume":"20 10","pages":"e1011454"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011454","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aneuploidy produces myriad consequences in health and disease, yet models of the deleterious effects of chromosome amplification are still widely debated. To distinguish the molecular determinants of aneuploidy stress, we measured the effects of duplicating individual genes in cells with different chromosome duplications, in wild-type cells (SSD1+) and cells sensitized to aneuploidy by deletion of RNA-binding protein Ssd1 (ssd1Δ). We identified gene duplications that are nearly neutral in wild-type euploid cells but significantly deleterious in euploids lacking SSD1 or in SSD1+ aneuploid cells with different chromosome duplications. Several of the most deleterious genes are linked to translation. In contrast, duplication of other genes benefits multiple ssd1Δ aneuploids over controls, and this group is enriched for translational effectors. Furthermore, both wild-type and especially ssd1Δ aneuploids with different chromosome amplifications show increased sensitivity to translational inhibitor nourseothricin. We used comparative modeling of aneuploid growth defects, based on the cumulative fitness costs measured for single-gene duplication. Our results present a model in which the deleterious effects of aneuploidy emerge from an interaction between the cumulative burden of many amplified genes on a chromosome and a subset of duplicated genes that become toxic in that context. These findings provide a perspective on the dual impact of individual genes and overall genomic burden, offering new avenues for understanding aneuploidy and its cellular consequences.
期刊介绍:
PLOS Genetics is run by an international Editorial Board, headed by the Editors-in-Chief, Greg Barsh (HudsonAlpha Institute of Biotechnology, and Stanford University School of Medicine) and Greg Copenhaver (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill).
Articles published in PLOS Genetics are archived in PubMed Central and cited in PubMed.