Impact of discharge checklist on guideline-directed medical therapy and mid-term prognosis in heart failure.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Korean Journal of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-24 DOI:10.3904/kjim.2024.088
Won-Seok Lee, Kyu-Sun Lee, Helsi Rismiati, Hae-Young Lee
{"title":"Impact of discharge checklist on guideline-directed medical therapy and mid-term prognosis in heart failure.","authors":"Won-Seok Lee, Kyu-Sun Lee, Helsi Rismiati, Hae-Young Lee","doi":"10.3904/kjim.2024.088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Despite the proven benefit of the guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), it remains underutilized in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (HF). We aimed to evaluate the impact of the discharge checklist on GDMT installation and the prognosis of HF patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a single-center, observational study that included all patients admitted for HF from March 2021 to February 2023. The data were retrieved from electronic medical records and discharge checklists. A comparison was conducted between the checklist group and the non-checklist group. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or readmission for HF within 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The checklist was completed for 537 patients (checklist group) and not for 187 patients (non-checklist group). The proportion of patients to whom two or more components of GDMT were prescribed was significantly higher in the checklist group than in the non-checklist group (59.6% vs 42.2%, p < 0.001). The checklist group exhibited a significantly lower primary outcome compared to the non-checklist group (27.4% vs. 36.4%, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.98, p = 0.036). The effect of the checklist was more prominent in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.77, p = 0.001) than in HF with mildly-reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.58-1.42, p = 0.676) (p for interaction = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of the discharge checklist was associated with an improvement in GDMT prescription and an improved prognosis in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction.</p>","PeriodicalId":48785,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"945-956"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569919/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2024.088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Despite the proven benefit of the guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), it remains underutilized in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (HF). We aimed to evaluate the impact of the discharge checklist on GDMT installation and the prognosis of HF patients.

Methods: This study was a single-center, observational study that included all patients admitted for HF from March 2021 to February 2023. The data were retrieved from electronic medical records and discharge checklists. A comparison was conducted between the checklist group and the non-checklist group. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or readmission for HF within 6 months.

Results: The checklist was completed for 537 patients (checklist group) and not for 187 patients (non-checklist group). The proportion of patients to whom two or more components of GDMT were prescribed was significantly higher in the checklist group than in the non-checklist group (59.6% vs 42.2%, p < 0.001). The checklist group exhibited a significantly lower primary outcome compared to the non-checklist group (27.4% vs. 36.4%, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.98, p = 0.036). The effect of the checklist was more prominent in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.77, p = 0.001) than in HF with mildly-reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.58-1.42, p = 0.676) (p for interaction = 0.06).

Conclusion: The implementation of the discharge checklist was associated with an improvement in GDMT prescription and an improved prognosis in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction.

出院清单对指导性医疗治疗和心力衰竭中期预后的影响。
背景/目的:尽管指南指导下的药物治疗(GDMT)已被证实具有益处,但在急性心力衰竭(HF)住院患者中仍未得到充分利用。我们的目的是评估出院检查清单对 GDMT 安装和心衰患者预后的影响:本研究是一项单中心观察性研究,纳入了 2021 年 3 月至 2023 年 2 月期间因高血压入院的所有患者。数据来自电子病历和出院检查单。在核对表组和非核对表组之间进行了比较。主要终点是全因死亡率或6个月内因高血压再次入院的综合结果:537名患者(核对表组)完成了核对表,187名患者(非核对表组)未完成核对表。核对表组中开具两种或两种以上 GDMT 成分处方的患者比例明显高于非核对表组(59.6% vs 42.2%,P < 0.001)。核对表组的主要结果明显低于非核对表组(27.4% vs. 36.4%,HR 0.73,95% CI 0.55-0.98,p = 0.036)。核对表对射血分数减低的心房颤动患者的影响(HR 0.51,95% CI 0.34-0.77,p = 0.001)比对射血分数轻度减低和保留的心房颤动患者的影响(HR 0.91,95% CI 0.58-1.42,p = 0.676)更为显著(交互作用的p = 0.06):出院清单的实施与射血分数减低的心房颤动患者GDMT处方的改善和预后的改善有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Internal Medicine
Korean Journal of Internal Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
129
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine is an international medical journal published in English by the Korean Association of Internal Medicine. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, reviews, and editorials on all aspects of medicine, including clinical investigations and basic research. Both human and experimental animal studies are welcome, as are new findings on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases. Case reports will be published only in exceptional circumstances, when they illustrate a rare occurrence of clinical importance. Letters to the editor are encouraged for specific comments on published articles and general viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信