Stress management preferences and stress experiences among Latinx immigrants in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic: Mixed-methods results from a community-academic research team.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Global Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-10-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/gmh.2024.101
Shanna D Stryker, Julia Rabin, Stephanie Castelin, Farrah Jacquez, Karen Chinchilla, Jenniffer Peralta, Lisa M Vaughn
{"title":"Stress management preferences and stress experiences among Latinx immigrants in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic: Mixed-methods results from a community-academic research team.","authors":"Shanna D Stryker, Julia Rabin, Stephanie Castelin, Farrah Jacquez, Karen Chinchilla, Jenniffer Peralta, Lisa M Vaughn","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2024.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Latinx individuals in the U.S. have higher levels of stress than other ethnic groups. Latinx immigrants living in non-traditional immigration destinations (NTIDs) have worse access to social and medical support and were particularly vulnerable during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to contextualize stress in Latinx immigrants in an NTID during the COVID-19 pandemic and to understand Latinx immigrants' preferences for stress management interventions given the sociopolitical and public health context.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using a community-based participatory research approach with mixed methods research design, community co-researchers gathered data using a quantitative survey and then contextualized survey results using a qualitative community conversation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Community conversation participants were surprised at the relatively low levels of reported stress and pandemic impact in survey participants, and they proposed the reason was the level of pre-pandemic stressors. Guatemalan immigrants in an NTID reported more stigma but fewer changes between pre- and post-pandemic stress levels. Survey respondents preferred to learn about stress management through YouTube videos or groups led by professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding the diversity of stress experiences among Latinx immigrant groups is critical to developing effective interventions. Coping strategy preferences are variable among different Latinx immigration groups, but asynchronous and/or professional-led stress management was preferred.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"e94"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2024.101","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Latinx individuals in the U.S. have higher levels of stress than other ethnic groups. Latinx immigrants living in non-traditional immigration destinations (NTIDs) have worse access to social and medical support and were particularly vulnerable during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to contextualize stress in Latinx immigrants in an NTID during the COVID-19 pandemic and to understand Latinx immigrants' preferences for stress management interventions given the sociopolitical and public health context.

Method: Using a community-based participatory research approach with mixed methods research design, community co-researchers gathered data using a quantitative survey and then contextualized survey results using a qualitative community conversation.

Results: Community conversation participants were surprised at the relatively low levels of reported stress and pandemic impact in survey participants, and they proposed the reason was the level of pre-pandemic stressors. Guatemalan immigrants in an NTID reported more stigma but fewer changes between pre- and post-pandemic stress levels. Survey respondents preferred to learn about stress management through YouTube videos or groups led by professionals.

Conclusions: Understanding the diversity of stress experiences among Latinx immigrant groups is critical to developing effective interventions. Coping strategy preferences are variable among different Latinx immigration groups, but asynchronous and/or professional-led stress management was preferred.

COVID-19 大流行期间美国拉丁裔移民的压力管理偏好和压力体验:来自社区-学术研究团队的混合方法研究成果。
背景:在美国,拉美裔个人的压力水平高于其他族裔群体。生活在非传统移民目的地(NTIDs)的拉丁裔移民更难获得社会和医疗支持,在 COVID-19 大流行期间尤其脆弱。本研究旨在分析 COVID-19 大流行期间非传统移民目的地的拉丁裔移民的压力背景,并了解在社会政治和公共卫生背景下拉丁裔移民对压力管理干预措施的偏好:采用基于社区的参与式研究方法和混合方法研究设计,社区共同研究人员通过定量调查收集数据,然后通过定性社区对话对调查结果进行背景分析:结果:社区对话参与者对调查参与者报告的压力和大流行影响水平相对较低感到惊讶,他们认为原因在于大流行前的压力水平。参加 NTID 的危地马拉移民报告了更多的耻辱感,但大流行前后的压力水平变化较小。调查对象更愿意通过 YouTube 视频或由专业人士领导的小组来学习压力管理:结论:了解拉丁裔移民群体压力体验的多样性对于制定有效的干预措施至关重要。不同拉丁裔移民群体的应对策略偏好各不相同,但异步和/或专业人士主导的压力管理是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Mental Health
Global Mental Health PSYCHIATRY-
自引率
5.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: lobal Mental Health (GMH) is an Open Access journal that publishes papers that have a broad application of ‘the global point of view’ of mental health issues. The field of ‘global mental health’ is still emerging, reflecting a movement of advocacy and associated research driven by an agenda to remedy longstanding treatment gaps and disparities in care, access, and capacity. But these efforts and goals are also driving a potential reframing of knowledge in powerful ways, and positioning a new disciplinary approach to mental health. GMH seeks to cultivate and grow this emerging distinct discipline of ‘global mental health’, and the new knowledge and paradigms that should come from it.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信