Key principles of the KiDD (kids' development diagnosis and determining the risk of autism for children from 1.5 to 6 years) methodology development and comparison of results with other methods.
{"title":"Key principles of the KiDD (kids' development diagnosis and determining the risk of autism for children from 1.5 to 6 years) methodology development and comparison of results with other methods.","authors":"Olena Iniutina","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2024.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The author outlines the basic principles of creating the KiDD methodology (Kids' Development Diagnosis and Determining the Risk of Autism) for children aged 1.5 to 6 years old in the form of a mobile application. Users of the KiDD (parents or specialists) instantly receive information about the general development of the child in comparison with the age at which certain skills emerge. This includes information about the developmental age in months for each developmental area (speech and communication, socialization and behavior, cognitive skills, physical development and self-care), the developmental age for each specific skill of the child (up to 100 skills in each age category from 1.5 to 6 years) and the likelihood of autism. Additionally, users receive an automatically generated Individual Development Plan, consisting of skills that follow those that the child already has. The author provides statistical data comparing the results obtained through the KiDD with the results of widely accepted tests for assessing a child's developmental level and the likelihood of autism. The article presents comparative data of the results of 199 participants using the KiDD along with their respective diagnoses and results obtained through testing provided by psychologists and remote assessment provided by parents.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"e88"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2024.85","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The author outlines the basic principles of creating the KiDD methodology (Kids' Development Diagnosis and Determining the Risk of Autism) for children aged 1.5 to 6 years old in the form of a mobile application. Users of the KiDD (parents or specialists) instantly receive information about the general development of the child in comparison with the age at which certain skills emerge. This includes information about the developmental age in months for each developmental area (speech and communication, socialization and behavior, cognitive skills, physical development and self-care), the developmental age for each specific skill of the child (up to 100 skills in each age category from 1.5 to 6 years) and the likelihood of autism. Additionally, users receive an automatically generated Individual Development Plan, consisting of skills that follow those that the child already has. The author provides statistical data comparing the results obtained through the KiDD with the results of widely accepted tests for assessing a child's developmental level and the likelihood of autism. The article presents comparative data of the results of 199 participants using the KiDD along with their respective diagnoses and results obtained through testing provided by psychologists and remote assessment provided by parents.
期刊介绍:
lobal Mental Health (GMH) is an Open Access journal that publishes papers that have a broad application of ‘the global point of view’ of mental health issues. The field of ‘global mental health’ is still emerging, reflecting a movement of advocacy and associated research driven by an agenda to remedy longstanding treatment gaps and disparities in care, access, and capacity. But these efforts and goals are also driving a potential reframing of knowledge in powerful ways, and positioning a new disciplinary approach to mental health. GMH seeks to cultivate and grow this emerging distinct discipline of ‘global mental health’, and the new knowledge and paradigms that should come from it.