Factors influencing unrelated stem cell donation a mixed-methods integrated systematic review.

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jessica Forbes, Paul Rice, Jenny Groarke, Emma Berry, Henrietta Graham, Lisa Graham-Wisener
{"title":"Factors influencing unrelated stem cell donation a mixed-methods integrated systematic review.","authors":"Jessica Forbes, Paul Rice, Jenny Groarke, Emma Berry, Henrietta Graham, Lisa Graham-Wisener","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is an imbalance between demand for and availability of stem cell donors worldwide. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide the first comprehensive understanding of facilitators and barriers influencing unrelated stem cell donation (USCD) in adults, through a data synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence. Identification of the facilitators and barriers associated with stem cell donation intention and behaviour is essential to inform the development of behaviour change interventions to meet the current demand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases were searched (Embase, PsycINFO, MEDLINE and CINAHL) and the last search was in February 2021. The search was limited to studies written in English and published from 1980 to present. Screening, quality assessment, data extraction and data synthesis incorporating the COM-B model were undertaken in line with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for an integrated mixed-methods review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty studies were included in the review, analysis and mapping produced four integrated findings. Donation-related knowledge was a facilitator and conversely, lack of knowledge was a barrier to donation related behaviours. Perceived convenience, positive social influences, religious beliefs and the accessibility of positive donation-related social norms promoted positive donation related behaviours. Altruism and sense of duty were the most commonly cited motives for donation related behaviours.Through mapping to the COM-B model, Communication/Marketing, and Service Provision are the primary policy categories that can be used to change donation related behaviours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future interventions should focus on targeted education regarding unrelated stem cell donation and creating recruitment campaigns that emphasise the life-saving potential of donation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12758","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: There is an imbalance between demand for and availability of stem cell donors worldwide. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide the first comprehensive understanding of facilitators and barriers influencing unrelated stem cell donation (USCD) in adults, through a data synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence. Identification of the facilitators and barriers associated with stem cell donation intention and behaviour is essential to inform the development of behaviour change interventions to meet the current demand.

Methods: Four databases were searched (Embase, PsycINFO, MEDLINE and CINAHL) and the last search was in February 2021. The search was limited to studies written in English and published from 1980 to present. Screening, quality assessment, data extraction and data synthesis incorporating the COM-B model were undertaken in line with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for an integrated mixed-methods review.

Results: Fifty studies were included in the review, analysis and mapping produced four integrated findings. Donation-related knowledge was a facilitator and conversely, lack of knowledge was a barrier to donation related behaviours. Perceived convenience, positive social influences, religious beliefs and the accessibility of positive donation-related social norms promoted positive donation related behaviours. Altruism and sense of duty were the most commonly cited motives for donation related behaviours.Through mapping to the COM-B model, Communication/Marketing, and Service Provision are the primary policy categories that can be used to change donation related behaviours.

Conclusion: Future interventions should focus on targeted education regarding unrelated stem cell donation and creating recruitment campaigns that emphasise the life-saving potential of donation.

影响非亲属干细胞捐献的因素--混合方法综合系统回顾。
目的:全世界对干细胞捐献者的需求与可用性之间存在不平衡。本系统综述旨在通过对定性和定量证据的数据综合,首次全面了解影响成人非亲属干细胞捐献(USCD)的促进因素和障碍。确定与干细胞捐献意向和行为相关的促进因素和障碍,对制定行为改变干预措施以满足当前需求至关重要:搜索了四个数据库(Embase、PsycINFO、MEDLINE和CINAHL),最后一次搜索是在2021年2月。检索仅限于 1980 年至今发表的英文研究。按照乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的综合混合方法综述方法,结合 COM-B 模型进行了筛选、质量评估、数据提取和数据综合:结果:50 项研究被纳入综述,通过分析和绘图得出了四项综合结论。捐赠相关知识是捐赠行为的促进因素,反之,缺乏相关知识则是捐赠行为的障碍。认为方便、积极的社会影响、宗教信仰和与捐赠相关的积极社会规范的可及性促进了积极的捐赠相关行为。通过与 COM-B 模型的映射,沟通/营销和服务提供是可用于改变捐赠相关行为的主要政策类别:结论:未来的干预措施应侧重于有关非亲属干细胞捐献的有针对性的教育,并开展招募活动,强调捐献挽救生命的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Health Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信