Components of multiple health behaviour change interventions for patients with chronic conditions: a systematic review and meta-regression of randomized trials.

IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Carolina C Silva, Justin Presseau, Zack van Allen, John Dinsmore, Paulina Schenk, Maiara Moreto, Marta M Marques
{"title":"Components of multiple health behaviour change interventions for patients with chronic conditions: a systematic review and meta-regression of randomized trials.","authors":"Carolina C Silva, Justin Presseau, Zack van Allen, John Dinsmore, Paulina Schenk, Maiara Moreto, Marta M Marques","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2413871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interventions addressing more than one health behaviour at a time could be an efficient way of intervening to manage chronic conditions. Within a systematic review of multiple health behaviour change (MBHC) interventions, we identified key components of interventions in patients with chronic conditions, assessed how they are linked to theory, behaviour change techniques implemented, and evaluated their impact on intervention effectiveness. Studies were identified by systematically searching five electronic databases. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were conducted to analyse the association between intervention components and behavioural changes. In total, 61 studies were included spanning different chronic conditions (e.g., cardiovascular conditions, type 2 diabetes). Most interventions sought to change behaviours simultaneously (72%), often targeting the 'physical activity, diet and smoking' cluster of behaviours (33%), and were not theory informed (55%). A total of 36 behaviour change techniques were identified, most commonly <i>goal setting behaviour</i> and <i>self-monitoring of behaviour</i>. Subgroup analyses indicated that MHBC interventions delivered entirely face-to-face might not be as effective for physical activity outcomes, and not using <i>goal setting (behaviour)</i> might be more effective for smoking cessation outcomes. Meta-regressions indicated that a longer intervention duration may work best to achieve better physical activity outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive understanding of interventions and contributes to the field of MHBC by facilitating data-driven insights for future optimisation and dissemination.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-56"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2024.2413871","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interventions addressing more than one health behaviour at a time could be an efficient way of intervening to manage chronic conditions. Within a systematic review of multiple health behaviour change (MBHC) interventions, we identified key components of interventions in patients with chronic conditions, assessed how they are linked to theory, behaviour change techniques implemented, and evaluated their impact on intervention effectiveness. Studies were identified by systematically searching five electronic databases. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were conducted to analyse the association between intervention components and behavioural changes. In total, 61 studies were included spanning different chronic conditions (e.g., cardiovascular conditions, type 2 diabetes). Most interventions sought to change behaviours simultaneously (72%), often targeting the 'physical activity, diet and smoking' cluster of behaviours (33%), and were not theory informed (55%). A total of 36 behaviour change techniques were identified, most commonly goal setting behaviour and self-monitoring of behaviour. Subgroup analyses indicated that MHBC interventions delivered entirely face-to-face might not be as effective for physical activity outcomes, and not using goal setting (behaviour) might be more effective for smoking cessation outcomes. Meta-regressions indicated that a longer intervention duration may work best to achieve better physical activity outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive understanding of interventions and contributes to the field of MHBC by facilitating data-driven insights for future optimisation and dissemination.

针对慢性病患者的多种健康行为改变干预措施的组成部分:随机试验的系统回顾和元回归。
同时针对一种以上健康行为的干预措施可能是管理慢性病的有效干预方式。在对多种健康行为改变(MBHC)干预措施的系统性回顾中,我们确定了针对慢性病患者的干预措施的关键组成部分,评估了它们如何与理论、行为改变技术的实施相联系,并评估了它们对干预效果的影响。通过系统检索五个电子数据库,我们确定了相关研究。进行了分组分析和元回归,以分析干预内容与行为改变之间的关联。共纳入了 61 项研究,涉及不同的慢性疾病(如心血管疾病、2 型糖尿病)。大多数干预措施试图同时改变行为(72%),通常针对 "体育锻炼、饮食和吸烟 "行为群(33%),并且没有理论依据(55%)。共确定了 36 种行为改变技术,其中最常见的是目标设定行为和行为自我监控。分组分析表明,完全面对面进行的 MHBC 干预可能对体育锻炼效果不那么有效,而不使用目标设定(行为)可能对戒烟效果更有效。元回归结果表明,干预持续时间越长,体育锻炼效果越好。本综述提供了对干预措施的全面了解,并通过促进数据驱动的洞察力,为未来的优化和推广工作做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Psychology Review
Health Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信