Visual parameter status as a predictive factor for the outcomes of occlusion therapy in anisometropic amblyopia.

IF 0.6 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-10-24 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_105_23
Subashree Palani, Sathiskumar Rangasami, Antony A Baskaran
{"title":"Visual parameter status as a predictive factor for the outcomes of occlusion therapy in anisometropic amblyopia.","authors":"Subashree Palani, Sathiskumar Rangasami, Antony A Baskaran","doi":"10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_105_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose is to compare visual parameters between normal and amblyopic eyes in anisometropic amblyopia and to find predictive factors for occlusion therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients with anisometropic amblyopia between the ages of 5 and 25 years were enrolled in the prospective, longitudinal, and interventional study. Patients were selected based on no improvement with spectacle correction alone after 1 month of follow-up. Baseline parameters such as LogMAR visual acuity, LEA contrast sensitivity, TNO stereopsis test, online Farnsworth D-15 test for color vision, accommodation with RAF ruler, +2.00/-2.00 flipper test, and dynamic retinoscopy were recorded. All patients were treated with occlusion therapy depending on their grades of amblyopia. After 6 months of follow-up, improvement in visual acuity was recorded with a LogMAR chart and correlated with initial visual parameters. Paired \"t\" test, Chi-square test, independent \"t\" test, analysis of variance test were used as statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Visual functions such as contrast sensitivity, accommodative facility, near point of accommodation, and accommodative amplitude showed a statistically significant difference between normal and amblyopic eyes of anisometropic amblyopia patients, whereas color vision did not differ significantly between normal and amblyopic eyes. Sixty-seven percentage of patients had poor stereopsis. Eighty percentage of patients who were younger had improvement in final best-corrected visual acuity and these patients had better stereopsis, contrast sensitivity, and mild-to-moderate amblyopia on initial testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The age of the patient, degree of anisometropia, spherical equivalent in amblyopic eyes, stereopsis, contrast sensitivity values at initial presentation, and compliance to occlusion therapy were found to be positive predictive factors of occlusion therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46810,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"38 3","pages":"286-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503984/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_105_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose is to compare visual parameters between normal and amblyopic eyes in anisometropic amblyopia and to find predictive factors for occlusion therapy.

Methods: Sixty patients with anisometropic amblyopia between the ages of 5 and 25 years were enrolled in the prospective, longitudinal, and interventional study. Patients were selected based on no improvement with spectacle correction alone after 1 month of follow-up. Baseline parameters such as LogMAR visual acuity, LEA contrast sensitivity, TNO stereopsis test, online Farnsworth D-15 test for color vision, accommodation with RAF ruler, +2.00/-2.00 flipper test, and dynamic retinoscopy were recorded. All patients were treated with occlusion therapy depending on their grades of amblyopia. After 6 months of follow-up, improvement in visual acuity was recorded with a LogMAR chart and correlated with initial visual parameters. Paired "t" test, Chi-square test, independent "t" test, analysis of variance test were used as statistical analysis.

Results: Visual functions such as contrast sensitivity, accommodative facility, near point of accommodation, and accommodative amplitude showed a statistically significant difference between normal and amblyopic eyes of anisometropic amblyopia patients, whereas color vision did not differ significantly between normal and amblyopic eyes. Sixty-seven percentage of patients had poor stereopsis. Eighty percentage of patients who were younger had improvement in final best-corrected visual acuity and these patients had better stereopsis, contrast sensitivity, and mild-to-moderate amblyopia on initial testing.

Conclusion: The age of the patient, degree of anisometropia, spherical equivalent in amblyopic eyes, stereopsis, contrast sensitivity values at initial presentation, and compliance to occlusion therapy were found to be positive predictive factors of occlusion therapy.

视觉参数状态是异向性弱视患者接受闭塞疗法的预测因素。
目的:旨在比较各向异性弱视患者正常眼和弱视眼的视觉参数,并找出遮盖疗法的预测因素:这项前瞻性、纵向和干预性研究共招募了 60 名年龄在 5 至 25 岁之间的异向性弱视患者。患者入选的标准是在随访 1 个月后,单纯的眼镜矫正效果没有改善。研究人员记录了基线参数,如对数马氏视力、LEA对比敏感度、TNO立体视测试、在线法恩斯沃斯D-15色觉测试、RAF尺调节、+2.00/-2.00翻转测试和动态视网膜镜检查。所有患者都根据弱视程度接受了遮盖治疗。随访 6 个月后,用 LogMAR 图表记录视力的改善情况,并将其与最初的视觉参数相关联。统计分析采用了配对 "t "检验、卡方检验、独立 "t "检验和方差分析检验:结果:对比敏感度、调节能力、调节近点和调节幅度等视觉功能在异向性弱视患者的正常眼和弱视眼之间存在显著差异,而色觉在正常眼和弱视眼之间没有显著差异。67%的患者立体视不良。80%的年轻患者的最终最佳矫正视力有所提高,这些患者的立体视、对比敏感度和轻度至中度弱视在初次测试时都较好:结论:患者的年龄、斜视程度、弱视眼的球面等值、立体视、初次检查时的对比敏感度值以及对闭塞疗法的依从性是闭塞疗法的积极预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology is an English language, peer-reviewed scholarly publication in the area of ophthalmology. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology publishes original papers, clinical studies, reviews and case reports. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology is the official publication of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信