Lip and incisor changes in patients with different ethnicities treated with extraction versus nonextraction: A cone-beam computed tomography study.

IF 2.6 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Rahma ElNaghy, Stephanie Grossman, Majd Hasanin, Riyad Al-Qawasmi
{"title":"Lip and incisor changes in patients with different ethnicities treated with extraction versus nonextraction: A cone-beam computed tomography study.","authors":"Rahma ElNaghy, Stephanie Grossman, Majd Hasanin, Riyad Al-Qawasmi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study used cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) via voxel-based superimposition to evaluate lip and incisor changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolar extractions (Ext) versus nonextraction (Non-Ext) among African American (AA) and White (W) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 240 CBCTs of 120 adolescent orthodontic patients with Class I skeletal/dental relationships were included. Patients were initially divided according to treatment, and then each group was subdivided according to patients' ethnicity (Ext/W = 30, Ext/AA = 30, Non-Ext/W = 30, and Non-Ext/AA = 30). CBCTs were imported into Invivo6 for voxel-based superimposition. Lip and incisor measurements were recorded. Independent t tests and two-way ANOVA were used for statistical assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Non-Ext/W group had a greater increase in all outcome variables compared with the Non-Ext/AA group, with a significant change in volume and position of upper (UL) and lower lips (LL), inclination of upper (U1) and lower incisors (L1), and position of U1. The Ext/AA group had a greater decrease in all measured outcomes compared with the Ext/W group, with significant change in inclination of U1 and L1, and position and volume of LL. W patients had more crowding than AA patients in both treatment approaches. Retraction ratios of 6.5:1 and 2.1:1 were recorded between the U1 and UL positions, and L1 and LL positions, respectively. There were no direct interaction effects between ethnicity and treatment, nor were there any significant effects of ethnicity after controlling for the covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ethnicity alone has no impact on incisor and lip position after treatment. However, ethnicity in the form of initial presentation of malocclusion can have a significant influence.</p>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.09.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study used cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) via voxel-based superimposition to evaluate lip and incisor changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolar extractions (Ext) versus nonextraction (Non-Ext) among African American (AA) and White (W) patients.

Methods: A total of 240 CBCTs of 120 adolescent orthodontic patients with Class I skeletal/dental relationships were included. Patients were initially divided according to treatment, and then each group was subdivided according to patients' ethnicity (Ext/W = 30, Ext/AA = 30, Non-Ext/W = 30, and Non-Ext/AA = 30). CBCTs were imported into Invivo6 for voxel-based superimposition. Lip and incisor measurements were recorded. Independent t tests and two-way ANOVA were used for statistical assessment.

Results: The Non-Ext/W group had a greater increase in all outcome variables compared with the Non-Ext/AA group, with a significant change in volume and position of upper (UL) and lower lips (LL), inclination of upper (U1) and lower incisors (L1), and position of U1. The Ext/AA group had a greater decrease in all measured outcomes compared with the Ext/W group, with significant change in inclination of U1 and L1, and position and volume of LL. W patients had more crowding than AA patients in both treatment approaches. Retraction ratios of 6.5:1 and 2.1:1 were recorded between the U1 and UL positions, and L1 and LL positions, respectively. There were no direct interaction effects between ethnicity and treatment, nor were there any significant effects of ethnicity after controlling for the covariates.

Conclusions: Ethnicity alone has no impact on incisor and lip position after treatment. However, ethnicity in the form of initial presentation of malocclusion can have a significant influence.

拔牙与不拔牙治疗下不同种族患者的唇和门牙变化:锥形束计算机断层扫描研究。
背景:本研究通过基于体素叠加的锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估非裔美国人(AA)和白人(W)患者在拔除四颗前磨牙(Ext)与不拔牙(Non-Ext)正畸治疗后唇和切牙的变化:共纳入了 120 名骨骼/牙齿关系为 I 级的青少年正畸患者的 240 张 CBCT。首先根据治疗方法对患者进行分组,然后根据患者的种族对每组进行细分(Ext/W=30,Ext/AA=30,Non-Ext/W=30,Non-Ext/AA=30)。将 CBCT 导入 Invivo6 进行体素叠加。记录嘴唇和门牙的测量值。统计评估采用独立 t 检验和双向方差分析:结果:与非 Ext/AA 组相比,非 Ext/W 组的所有结果变量均有较大增加,上唇(UL)和下唇(LL)的体积和位置、上门牙(U1)和下门牙(L1)的倾斜度以及 U1 的位置均有显著变化。与 Ext/W 组相比,Ext/AA 组在所有测量结果上都有更大的下降,U1 和 L1 的倾斜度以及 LL 的位置和体积都有显著变化。在两种治疗方法中,W 患者的拥挤程度均高于 AA 患者。U1 和 UL 位置以及 L1 和 LL 位置之间的回缩比分别为 6.5:1 和 2.1:1。种族和治疗方法之间没有直接的交互作用,在控制了协变量后,种族也没有明显的影响:结论:种族本身对治疗后的门牙和嘴唇位置没有影响。结论:种族本身对治疗后的门牙和唇位没有影响,但种族在错颌畸形初期的表现形式会产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信