The Management and Prevention of Delirium in Elderly Patients Hospitalised in Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
Sarai Zaher-Sánchez, Pedro José Satústegui-Dordá, Enrique Ramón-Arbués, Jose Angel Santos-Sánchez, Juan José Aguilón-Leiva, Sofía Pérez-Calahorra, Raúl Juárez-Vela, Teresa Sufrate-Sorzano, Beatriz Angulo-Nalda, María Elena Garrote-Cámara, Iván Santolalla-Arnedo, Emmanuel Echániz-Serrano
{"title":"The Management and Prevention of Delirium in Elderly Patients Hospitalised in Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Sarai Zaher-Sánchez, Pedro José Satústegui-Dordá, Enrique Ramón-Arbués, Jose Angel Santos-Sánchez, Juan José Aguilón-Leiva, Sofía Pérez-Calahorra, Raúl Juárez-Vela, Teresa Sufrate-Sorzano, Beatriz Angulo-Nalda, María Elena Garrote-Cámara, Iván Santolalla-Arnedo, Emmanuel Echániz-Serrano","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14040219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium or an acute confusional state (ACS) is characterised as being a frequent and complex hospital complication in older adult patients, which can affect their level of independence and increase patient morbidity and mortality. Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) frequently develop ICU delirium, leading to longer hospital and ICU stays, increased mortality and long-term impairment.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aims to assess existing evidence of interventions that can be considered effective for the management and prevention of delirium in ICUs, reducing short-term morbidity and mortality, ICU and hospital admission times and the occurrence of other long-term complications.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>For this systematic review, we searched Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINHAL, LILACS, SciELO and Dialnet from January 2018 to August 2024, in English, Spanish and French. MeSH descriptors were adjusted to search the different databases. We also checked Prospero for ongoing systematic reviews.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>The electronic search yielded a total of 2656 studies, of which 14 trials met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 14,711 participants. We included eight randomised clinical trial (RCTs), four cohort analyses, one systematic review and one observational trial, including participants over 65 years admitted to the ICU. Ten of these studies were based on pharmacological interventions, three of them examined non-pharmacological interventions and the remaining study examined mixed (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions. Six placebo RCTs were included, plus four reported comparisons between different drugs. Regarding non-pharmacological interventions, nursing programmes focused on optimising modifiable risk factors or the use of therapies such as bright light are emerging. Regarding mixed interventions, we found the combination of invasive techniques and with sedoanalgesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to its satisfactory level of sedation, dexmedetomidine is presented as a viable option because, although olanzapine offers safer results, postoperative administration angiotensin inhibitor systems significantly reduced the incidence of delirium. As for propofol, no significant differences were found. Among the non-pharmacological and mixed therapies, bright light therapy was able to reduce the incidence of delirium, and the combination of epidural/general anaesthesia was effective in all subtypes of delirium. Concerning the remaining interventions, the scientific evidence is still insufficient to provide a definitive recommendation.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Delirium or an acute confusional state (ACS) is characterised as being a frequent and complex hospital complication in older adult patients, which can affect their level of independence and increase patient morbidity and mortality. Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) frequently develop ICU delirium, leading to longer hospital and ICU stays, increased mortality and long-term impairment.

Objectives: This review aims to assess existing evidence of interventions that can be considered effective for the management and prevention of delirium in ICUs, reducing short-term morbidity and mortality, ICU and hospital admission times and the occurrence of other long-term complications.

Methodology: For this systematic review, we searched Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINHAL, LILACS, SciELO and Dialnet from January 2018 to August 2024, in English, Spanish and French. MeSH descriptors were adjusted to search the different databases. We also checked Prospero for ongoing systematic reviews.

Main results: The electronic search yielded a total of 2656 studies, of which 14 trials met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 14,711 participants. We included eight randomised clinical trial (RCTs), four cohort analyses, one systematic review and one observational trial, including participants over 65 years admitted to the ICU. Ten of these studies were based on pharmacological interventions, three of them examined non-pharmacological interventions and the remaining study examined mixed (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions. Six placebo RCTs were included, plus four reported comparisons between different drugs. Regarding non-pharmacological interventions, nursing programmes focused on optimising modifiable risk factors or the use of therapies such as bright light are emerging. Regarding mixed interventions, we found the combination of invasive techniques and with sedoanalgesia.

Conclusions: Due to its satisfactory level of sedation, dexmedetomidine is presented as a viable option because, although olanzapine offers safer results, postoperative administration angiotensin inhibitor systems significantly reduced the incidence of delirium. As for propofol, no significant differences were found. Among the non-pharmacological and mixed therapies, bright light therapy was able to reduce the incidence of delirium, and the combination of epidural/general anaesthesia was effective in all subtypes of delirium. Concerning the remaining interventions, the scientific evidence is still insufficient to provide a definitive recommendation.

重症监护病房住院老年患者谵妄的管理与预防:系统回顾
背景:谵妄或急性意识模糊状态(ACS)是老年患者在医院经常出现的一种复杂并发症,会影响患者的独立生活能力,增加患者的发病率和死亡率。重症监护室(ICU)中的危重病人经常会出现重症监护室谵妄,导致住院时间和重症监护室停留时间延长、死亡率上升和长期功能损害:本综述旨在评估现有干预措施的证据,这些干预措施可有效管理和预防重症监护室谵妄,降低短期发病率和死亡率、重症监护室和住院时间以及其他长期并发症的发生:为进行本系统性综述,我们检索了 2018 年 1 月至 2024 年 8 月期间的 Medline、PubMed、Cochrane Library、CINHAL、LILACS、SciELO 和 Dialnet(英语、西班牙语和法语)。对 MeSH 描述进行了调整,以搜索不同的数据库。我们还检查了 Prospero 正在进行的系统性综述:电子检索共获得 2656 项研究,其中 14 项试验符合资格标准,共有 14711 名参与者。我们纳入了 8 项随机临床试验 (RCT)、4 项队列分析、1 项系统综述和 1 项观察性试验,其中包括入住重症监护病房的 65 岁以上的参与者。其中 10 项研究以药物干预为基础,3 项研究以非药物干预为基础,其余研究以混合(药物和非药物)干预为基础。其中包括六项安慰剂研究,另外四项报告了不同药物之间的比较。在非药物干预方面,护理计划的重点是优化可改变的风险因素或使用强光等疗法。在混合干预方面,我们发现了有创技术与镇静镇痛的结合:由于右美托咪定的镇静效果令人满意,因此它是一种可行的选择,因为尽管奥氮平的效果更安全,但术后使用血管紧张素抑制剂系统可显著降低谵妄的发生率。至于异丙酚,则没有发现明显的差异。在非药物疗法和混合疗法中,强光疗法能够降低谵妄的发生率,硬膜外/全身麻醉联合疗法对所有亚型谵妄均有效。至于其他干预措施,科学证据仍不足以提供明确的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信