Dementia Rehabilitation Training for General Practitioners and Practice Nurses: Does It Make a Difference?

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
Den-Ching A Lee, Grant Russell, Terry P Haines, Keith D Hill, Claire M C O'Connor, Natasha Layton, Kate Swaffer, Marita Long, Catherine Devanny, Michele L Callisaya
{"title":"Dementia Rehabilitation Training for General Practitioners and Practice Nurses: Does It Make a Difference?","authors":"Den-Ching A Lee, Grant Russell, Terry P Haines, Keith D Hill, Claire M C O'Connor, Natasha Layton, Kate Swaffer, Marita Long, Catherine Devanny, Michele L Callisaya","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14040226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Rehabilitation helps reduce disability in dementia. The Australian National Dementia Action Plan identifies a gap in clear treatment pathways post-diagnosis, affecting the quality of life for those with dementia. This study assessed the impact of a one-day dementia training course and follow-up on GPs' and practice nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and confidence regarding dementia rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The training, led by two experienced GPs and an academic physiotherapist, covered dementia diagnosis, allied health roles, care planning, and referrals. The follow-up involved applying the learnt material and completing a reflective task. Three longitudinal surveys (Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale-DKAS, General Practitioners' Attitudes and Confidence towards Dementia Survey-GPACS-D, and Dementia Rehabilitation Scale) and Likert-scale statements were conducted pre-course, post-course, and at four-month follow-up, alongside a focus group. Descriptive and regression analyses were applied to survey data, and content analysis was used for focus group data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen participants (14 GPs, 3 nurses) completed the pre-post-course survey, with eight (6 GPs, 2 nurses) participating in follow-up and focus group discussions. Post-course, DKAS scores increased by 12.1%, GPACS-D by 10.1%, and the dementia rehabilitation scale by 9.4%. Likert-scale statements improved by 8-79%. At the four-month follow-up, there was a slight, non-significant decline in most measures. Focus groups highlighted the training's impacts, useful components, barriers, and suggestions for improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Training GPs and practice nurses in dementia rehabilitation enhances knowledge, awareness, and confidence. Ongoing efforts are needed to sustain benefits and address referral barriers for better access to dementia rehabilitation services.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Rehabilitation helps reduce disability in dementia. The Australian National Dementia Action Plan identifies a gap in clear treatment pathways post-diagnosis, affecting the quality of life for those with dementia. This study assessed the impact of a one-day dementia training course and follow-up on GPs' and practice nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and confidence regarding dementia rehabilitation.

Methods: The training, led by two experienced GPs and an academic physiotherapist, covered dementia diagnosis, allied health roles, care planning, and referrals. The follow-up involved applying the learnt material and completing a reflective task. Three longitudinal surveys (Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale-DKAS, General Practitioners' Attitudes and Confidence towards Dementia Survey-GPACS-D, and Dementia Rehabilitation Scale) and Likert-scale statements were conducted pre-course, post-course, and at four-month follow-up, alongside a focus group. Descriptive and regression analyses were applied to survey data, and content analysis was used for focus group data.

Results: Seventeen participants (14 GPs, 3 nurses) completed the pre-post-course survey, with eight (6 GPs, 2 nurses) participating in follow-up and focus group discussions. Post-course, DKAS scores increased by 12.1%, GPACS-D by 10.1%, and the dementia rehabilitation scale by 9.4%. Likert-scale statements improved by 8-79%. At the four-month follow-up, there was a slight, non-significant decline in most measures. Focus groups highlighted the training's impacts, useful components, barriers, and suggestions for improvement.

Conclusion: Training GPs and practice nurses in dementia rehabilitation enhances knowledge, awareness, and confidence. Ongoing efforts are needed to sustain benefits and address referral barriers for better access to dementia rehabilitation services.

全科医生和执业护士的痴呆康复培训:它能带来改变吗?
背景/目的:康复有助于减少痴呆症患者的残疾。澳大利亚国家痴呆症行动计划》指出,在诊断后的明确治疗途径方面存在差距,这影响了痴呆症患者的生活质量。本研究评估了为期一天的痴呆症培训课程和后续行动对全科医生和执业护士有关痴呆症康复的知识、态度和信心的影响:培训由两名经验丰富的全科医生和一名学术物理治疗师主持,内容包括痴呆症诊断、专职医疗角色、护理规划和转诊。后续活动包括应用所学材料和完成反思任务。在课程前、课程后和为期四个月的随访中,进行了三次纵向调查(痴呆症知识评估量表-DKAS、全科医生对痴呆症的态度和信心调查-GPACS-D、痴呆症康复量表),并在焦点小组中进行了李克特量表陈述。对调查数据进行了描述性分析和回归分析,对焦点小组数据进行了内容分析:17名参与者(14名全科医生,3名护士)完成了课程前后的调查,8名参与者(6名全科医生,2名护士)参加了后续活动和焦点小组讨论。课程结束后,DKAS评分提高了12.1%,GPACS-D提高了10.1%,痴呆康复量表提高了9.4%。李克特量表评分提高了 8-79%。在四个月的随访中,大多数指标都出现了轻微、不明显的下降。焦点小组强调了培训的影响、有用的内容、障碍和改进建议:结论:对全科医生和执业护士进行痴呆康复培训可增强他们的知识、意识和信心。需要持续努力,以保持培训带来的益处并解决转诊障碍,从而更好地获得痴呆康复服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信