Using data fusion with multiple imputation to correct for misclassification in self-reported exposure: a case-control study of cannabis use and homicide victimization.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Seonghun Lee, Guohua Li, Stanford Chihuri, Yuanzhi Yu, Qixuan Chen
{"title":"Using data fusion with multiple imputation to correct for misclassification in self-reported exposure: a case-control study of cannabis use and homicide victimization.","authors":"Seonghun Lee, Guohua Li, Stanford Chihuri, Yuanzhi Yu, Qixuan Chen","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00545-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cannabis use has been causally linked to violent behaviors in experimental and case studies, but its association with homicide victimization has not been rigorously assessed through epidemiologic research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a case-control analysis using two national data systems. Cases were homicide victims from the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS), and controls were participants from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). While the NVDRS contained toxicological testing data on cannabis use, the NSDUH only collected self-reported data, and thus the potential misclassification in the self-reported data needed to be corrected. We took a data fusion approach by concatenating the NSDUH with a third data system, the National Roadside Survey of Alcohol and Drug Use by Drivers (NRS), which collected toxicological testing and self-reported data on cannabis use for drivers. The data fusion approach provided multiple imputations (MIs) of toxicological testing results on cannabis use for the participants in the NSDUH, which were then used in the case-control analysis. Bootstrap was used to obtain valid statistical inference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyses revealed that cannabis use was associated with 3.55-fold (95% CI: 2.75-4.35) increased odds of homicide victimization. Alcohol use, being Black, male, aged 21-34 years, and having less than a high school education were also significantly associated with increased odds of homicide victimization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cannabis use is a major risk factor for homicide victimization. The data fusion with MI method is useful in integrative data analysis for harmonizing measures between different data sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-024-00545-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cannabis use has been causally linked to violent behaviors in experimental and case studies, but its association with homicide victimization has not been rigorously assessed through epidemiologic research.

Methods: We performed a case-control analysis using two national data systems. Cases were homicide victims from the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS), and controls were participants from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). While the NVDRS contained toxicological testing data on cannabis use, the NSDUH only collected self-reported data, and thus the potential misclassification in the self-reported data needed to be corrected. We took a data fusion approach by concatenating the NSDUH with a third data system, the National Roadside Survey of Alcohol and Drug Use by Drivers (NRS), which collected toxicological testing and self-reported data on cannabis use for drivers. The data fusion approach provided multiple imputations (MIs) of toxicological testing results on cannabis use for the participants in the NSDUH, which were then used in the case-control analysis. Bootstrap was used to obtain valid statistical inference.

Results: The analyses revealed that cannabis use was associated with 3.55-fold (95% CI: 2.75-4.35) increased odds of homicide victimization. Alcohol use, being Black, male, aged 21-34 years, and having less than a high school education were also significantly associated with increased odds of homicide victimization.

Conclusions: Cannabis use is a major risk factor for homicide victimization. The data fusion with MI method is useful in integrative data analysis for harmonizing measures between different data sources.

使用多重估算的数据融合来纠正自我报告暴露的错误分类:关于大麻使用和凶杀案受害情况的病例对照研究。
背景:在实验和案例研究中,吸食大麻与暴力行为存在因果关系,但流行病学研究尚未对其与凶杀案的关联性进行严格评估:我们利用两个国家数据系统进行了病例对照分析。病例是来自全国暴力死亡报告系统(NVDRS)的凶杀案受害者,对照是来自全国药物使用和健康调查(NSDUH)的参与者。NVDRS 包含大麻使用的毒理学检测数据,而 NSDUH 只收集自我报告数据,因此需要纠正自我报告数据中可能存在的误分类。我们采取了一种数据融合方法,将 NSDUH 与第三个数据系统--全国路边驾驶员酒精和药物使用情况调查(NRS)--合并在一起,后者收集了驾驶员使用大麻的毒理测试和自我报告数据。数据融合方法为 NSDUH 参与者的大麻使用毒理学检测结果提供了多重推定 (MI),然后将其用于病例对照分析。使用 Bootstrap 方法获得了有效的统计推论:分析结果显示,吸食大麻与凶杀案受害几率增加 3.55 倍(95% CI:2.75-4.35)有关。酗酒、黑人、男性、21-34 岁和高中以下学历也与凶杀案受害几率增加有显著关联:结论:吸食大麻是凶杀案的一个主要风险因素。使用多元智能方法进行数据融合有助于进行综合数据分析,协调不同数据源之间的测量结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Injury Epidemiology
Injury Epidemiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Injury Epidemiology is dedicated to advancing the scientific foundation for injury prevention and control through timely publication and dissemination of peer-reviewed research. Injury Epidemiology aims to be the premier venue for communicating epidemiologic studies of unintentional and intentional injuries, including, but not limited to, morbidity and mortality from motor vehicle crashes, drug overdose/poisoning, falls, drowning, fires/burns, iatrogenic injury, suicide, homicide, assaults, and abuse. We welcome investigations designed to understand the magnitude, distribution, determinants, causes, prevention, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and outcomes of injuries in specific population groups, geographic regions, and environmental settings (e.g., home, workplace, transport, recreation, sports, and urban/rural). Injury Epidemiology has a special focus on studies generating objective and practical knowledge that can be translated into interventions to reduce injury morbidity and mortality on a population level. Priority consideration will be given to manuscripts that feature contemporary theories and concepts, innovative methods, and novel techniques as applied to injury surveillance, risk assessment, development and implementation of effective interventions, and program and policy evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信