Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin in Treating Gram-Negative Infections: Does Obesity Matter?

IF 2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy12050147
Sultan Alotaibi, Nader Damfu, Ahmed Alnefaie, Abdullah Alqurashi, Sami Althagafi, Aown Alotaibi, Musim Alotaibi, Abdullah Alsuwat
{"title":"Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin in Treating Gram-Negative Infections: Does Obesity Matter?","authors":"Sultan Alotaibi, Nader Damfu, Ahmed Alnefaie, Abdullah Alqurashi, Sami Althagafi, Aown Alotaibi, Musim Alotaibi, Abdullah Alsuwat","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy12050147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity is considered a health issue associated with increased morbidity and a risk factor for multiple conditions, such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and infections. It may affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of many drugs, including antimicrobials like ciprofloxacin. Regrettably, data on ciprofloxacin's efficacy in obese patients remain scarce. This study aims to evaluate the impact of obesity on the efficacy of ciprofloxacin in treating Gram-negative bacterial infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted in two tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Adult patients (≥18 years) treated with ciprofloxacin for confirmed Gram-negative infection between January 2017 and April 2023 were included. Patients were excluded if they received ciprofloxacin empirically, had inadequate source control within 72 h, or had missing weight and height information at ciprofloxacin initiation. The primary outcome was clinical cure, defined as the resolution of the clinical infection manifestations without additional therapeutic management by the end of treatment. Other secondary and safety outcomes were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 99 patients were included, divided into obese (<i>n</i> = 42) and non-obese (<i>n</i> = 57) groups. The obese group had a significantly lower median age (50 years) compared to the non-obese group (64 years) (<i>p</i> = 0.002). The obese group had fewer male patients (38.10% vs. 68.42%; <i>p</i> = 0.004), higher body weight (90 (81-97) vs. 63 (55-70) days; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and lower height (158 (155-165) vs. 165 (158-172) days; <i>p</i> = 0.008) compared to non-obese. Urinary tract infection was the most common type, with <i>Escherichia coli</i> being the most common isolate. The median hospital length of stay was shorter in the obese group than in the non-obese group (1 vs. 3 days, <i>p</i> = 0.007). There were no significant differences in clinical cure rates between obese (85.71%) and non-obese (85.96%) patients (<i>p</i> = 1). No significant differences were observed in terms of in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, or 60-day infection recurrence rates between the two groups. Microbiological eradication was not achieved in the obese group, whereas a 10.53% eradication rate was observed in the non-obese group (<i>p</i> = 0.037). However, the majority of the patients had indeterminate eradication. The incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was lower in the obese group (4.76%) compared to the non-obese group (17.54%, <i>p</i> = 0.066).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment with ciprofloxacin in obese patients has similar efficacy and safety outcomes compared to non-obese patients with infections due to Gram-negative pathogens.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"12 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11511332/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12050147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obesity is considered a health issue associated with increased morbidity and a risk factor for multiple conditions, such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and infections. It may affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of many drugs, including antimicrobials like ciprofloxacin. Regrettably, data on ciprofloxacin's efficacy in obese patients remain scarce. This study aims to evaluate the impact of obesity on the efficacy of ciprofloxacin in treating Gram-negative bacterial infections.

Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted in two tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Adult patients (≥18 years) treated with ciprofloxacin for confirmed Gram-negative infection between January 2017 and April 2023 were included. Patients were excluded if they received ciprofloxacin empirically, had inadequate source control within 72 h, or had missing weight and height information at ciprofloxacin initiation. The primary outcome was clinical cure, defined as the resolution of the clinical infection manifestations without additional therapeutic management by the end of treatment. Other secondary and safety outcomes were also assessed.

Results: A total of 99 patients were included, divided into obese (n = 42) and non-obese (n = 57) groups. The obese group had a significantly lower median age (50 years) compared to the non-obese group (64 years) (p = 0.002). The obese group had fewer male patients (38.10% vs. 68.42%; p = 0.004), higher body weight (90 (81-97) vs. 63 (55-70) days; p < 0.001), and lower height (158 (155-165) vs. 165 (158-172) days; p = 0.008) compared to non-obese. Urinary tract infection was the most common type, with Escherichia coli being the most common isolate. The median hospital length of stay was shorter in the obese group than in the non-obese group (1 vs. 3 days, p = 0.007). There were no significant differences in clinical cure rates between obese (85.71%) and non-obese (85.96%) patients (p = 1). No significant differences were observed in terms of in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, or 60-day infection recurrence rates between the two groups. Microbiological eradication was not achieved in the obese group, whereas a 10.53% eradication rate was observed in the non-obese group (p = 0.037). However, the majority of the patients had indeterminate eradication. The incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was lower in the obese group (4.76%) compared to the non-obese group (17.54%, p = 0.066).

Conclusions: Treatment with ciprofloxacin in obese patients has similar efficacy and safety outcomes compared to non-obese patients with infections due to Gram-negative pathogens.

环丙沙星治疗革兰氏阴性菌感染的疗效:肥胖是否重要?
背景:肥胖被认为是一个与发病率增加有关的健康问题,也是多种疾病(如 2 型糖尿病、心血管疾病和感染)的风险因素。肥胖可能会影响许多药物的药代动力学和药效学,包括环丙沙星等抗菌药物。遗憾的是,有关环丙沙星对肥胖患者疗效的数据仍然很少。本研究旨在评估肥胖对环丙沙星治疗革兰氏阴性菌感染疗效的影响:在沙特阿拉伯的两家三级医院开展了一项回顾性多中心队列研究。研究纳入了 2017 年 1 月至 2023 年 4 月间因确诊革兰氏阴性菌感染而接受环丙沙星治疗的成年患者(≥18 岁)。如果患者是经验性接受环丙沙星治疗、72小时内病源控制不足或开始使用环丙沙星时体重和身高信息缺失,则排除在外。主要结果是临床治愈,即在治疗结束时临床感染症状消失,无需额外治疗。此外还评估了其他次要结果和安全性结果:共纳入 99 例患者,分为肥胖组(42 例)和非肥胖组(57 例)。肥胖组的中位年龄(50 岁)明显低于非肥胖组(64 岁)(P = 0.002)。与非肥胖组相比,肥胖组男性患者较少(38.10% 对 68.42%;p = 0.004),体重较高(90(81-97)天对 63(55-70)天;p < 0.001),身高较低(158(155-165)天对 165(158-172)天;p = 0.008)。尿路感染是最常见的感染类型,大肠埃希菌是最常见的分离菌。肥胖组的中位住院时间比非肥胖组短(1 天对 3 天,P = 0.007)。肥胖组(85.71%)和非肥胖组(85.96%)患者的临床治愈率无明显差异(P = 1)。两组患者的院内死亡率、30 天死亡率和 60 天感染复发率均无明显差异。肥胖组未实现微生物根除,而非肥胖组的根除率为 10.53%(p = 0.037)。然而,大多数患者的根除率并不确定。肥胖组的药物不良反应(ADRs)发生率(4.76%)低于非肥胖组(17.54%,P = 0.066):结论:与非肥胖革兰氏阴性病原体感染患者相比,肥胖患者使用环丙沙星治疗具有相似的疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信