Clinical Efficacy of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
YiBo Dong, YongTao Wang, Yang Yu
{"title":"Clinical Efficacy of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.","authors":"YiBo Dong, YongTao Wang, Yang Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-TLIF) is an advanced, minimally invasive spinal surgical technique characterized by the use of 2 discrete portals-one for clear visualization and continuous irrigation and the other for the dexterous manipulation of surgical instruments. This configuration not only affords an expanded view (0° or 30°) but also enhances the freedom of movement for instruments, thereby augmenting the precision and flexibility of the surgery. The superiority of UBE-TLIF lies in its capacity to facilitate rapid postoperative recovery with minimal trauma, reduced intraoperative bleeding, abbreviated hospital stays, and significant amelioration of postoperative lower back pain. Comparatively, UBE-TLIF demonstrates equivalent fusion rates and clinical outcomes to traditional open surgeries while also increasing patient satisfaction.<sup>1-3</sup> In the UBE-TLIF procedure, the potential for nerve root disturbance due to surgical manipulation is a critical consideration. To minimize this, the authors have refined the surgical approach, as demonstrated in Video 1. The insertion of a guidewire is prioritized before the fusion process for 2 key reasons: to ensure accurate segmental alignment under the biportal endoscope and to avoid the risk of spinal canal injury that could arise if the guidewire were to be inserted after spinal decompression. The horizontal orientation of the cage is a pivotal technique, as it not only restores spinal curvature effectively but also circumvents the complications associated with oblique insertion, including the prevention of contralateral foraminal narrowing. This strategic positioning is vital for optimizing spinal alignment and reducing the likelihood of iatrogenic issues.<sup>4</sup> After cage implantation, the decompression of the dorsal ligamentum flavum is carefully executed, with an emphasis on preserving the ligament to lessen the potential irritation to the nerve roots during the implantation process. This nuanced approach ensures that while achieving spinal fusion, there is also a significant reduction in the risk of nerve root stimulation, striking a harmonious balance between the goals of spinal stabilization and neural element safety. In this video demonstration, we highlight 2 key advantages of the UBE-TLIF procedure<sup>4</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>5</sup>: (1) Optimal lordosis and stability via cage technique: This study introduces a cage-rotation technique that enhances the accuracy and efficacy of UBE-TLIF. The fusion cage is meticulously inserted at a 45° angle to the lamina, with the process halted once two thirds of the cage is in place. An assistant then delicately taps the final one-third segment, ensuring the cage is perfectly aligned with the posterior vertebral edge. This method differs from the traditional oblique insertion, as it significantly improves the spinal lordosis by augmenting disc height, segmental lordosis, and overall lumbar curvature. Additionally, the traverse cage positioning provides enhanced stability, marked by a greater posterior distance from the vertebral body, thus minimizing the potential for cage subsidence or migration. (2) Prioritizing fusion cage insertion for refined decompression<sup>6</sup>: By prioritizing the fusion cage insertion before the neural decompression, our approach underscores the importance of preserving the ligamentum flavum. This technique reduces neural irritation during the procedure, leading to an improved patient experience postoperatively. UBE-TLIF offers a safe, efficacious, and swiftly recuperative minimally invasive option for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. It diminishes reliance on costly equipment, thereby facilitating the dissemination and application of this technology in community hospitals.<sup>7</sup>.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.064","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-TLIF) is an advanced, minimally invasive spinal surgical technique characterized by the use of 2 discrete portals-one for clear visualization and continuous irrigation and the other for the dexterous manipulation of surgical instruments. This configuration not only affords an expanded view (0° or 30°) but also enhances the freedom of movement for instruments, thereby augmenting the precision and flexibility of the surgery. The superiority of UBE-TLIF lies in its capacity to facilitate rapid postoperative recovery with minimal trauma, reduced intraoperative bleeding, abbreviated hospital stays, and significant amelioration of postoperative lower back pain. Comparatively, UBE-TLIF demonstrates equivalent fusion rates and clinical outcomes to traditional open surgeries while also increasing patient satisfaction.1-3 In the UBE-TLIF procedure, the potential for nerve root disturbance due to surgical manipulation is a critical consideration. To minimize this, the authors have refined the surgical approach, as demonstrated in Video 1. The insertion of a guidewire is prioritized before the fusion process for 2 key reasons: to ensure accurate segmental alignment under the biportal endoscope and to avoid the risk of spinal canal injury that could arise if the guidewire were to be inserted after spinal decompression. The horizontal orientation of the cage is a pivotal technique, as it not only restores spinal curvature effectively but also circumvents the complications associated with oblique insertion, including the prevention of contralateral foraminal narrowing. This strategic positioning is vital for optimizing spinal alignment and reducing the likelihood of iatrogenic issues.4 After cage implantation, the decompression of the dorsal ligamentum flavum is carefully executed, with an emphasis on preserving the ligament to lessen the potential irritation to the nerve roots during the implantation process. This nuanced approach ensures that while achieving spinal fusion, there is also a significant reduction in the risk of nerve root stimulation, striking a harmonious balance between the goals of spinal stabilization and neural element safety. In this video demonstration, we highlight 2 key advantages of the UBE-TLIF procedure4,5: (1) Optimal lordosis and stability via cage technique: This study introduces a cage-rotation technique that enhances the accuracy and efficacy of UBE-TLIF. The fusion cage is meticulously inserted at a 45° angle to the lamina, with the process halted once two thirds of the cage is in place. An assistant then delicately taps the final one-third segment, ensuring the cage is perfectly aligned with the posterior vertebral edge. This method differs from the traditional oblique insertion, as it significantly improves the spinal lordosis by augmenting disc height, segmental lordosis, and overall lumbar curvature. Additionally, the traverse cage positioning provides enhanced stability, marked by a greater posterior distance from the vertebral body, thus minimizing the potential for cage subsidence or migration. (2) Prioritizing fusion cage insertion for refined decompression6: By prioritizing the fusion cage insertion before the neural decompression, our approach underscores the importance of preserving the ligamentum flavum. This technique reduces neural irritation during the procedure, leading to an improved patient experience postoperatively. UBE-TLIF offers a safe, efficacious, and swiftly recuperative minimally invasive option for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. It diminishes reliance on costly equipment, thereby facilitating the dissemination and application of this technology in community hospitals.7.

单侧双腹腔镜经椎间孔腰椎椎体融合术的临床疗效。
单侧双侧内窥镜经椎间孔腰椎椎体融合术(UBE-TLIF)是一种先进的微创脊柱外科技术,其特点是使用两个不相连的切口,一个用于清晰观察和持续灌注,另一个用于灵巧地操作手术器械。这种配置不仅扩大了视野(0° 或 30°),还提高了器械的移动自由度,从而增强了手术的精确性和灵活性。UBE-TLIF 的优越性在于它能以最小的创伤促进术后快速恢复,减少术中出血,缩短住院时间,明显改善术后下背疼痛。相比之下,UBE-TLIF 的融合率和临床效果与传统的开放手术相当,同时还能提高患者的满意度。1-3 在 UBE-TLIF 手术中,手术操作可能导致的神经根干扰是一个重要的考虑因素。为了尽量减少这种情况,作者改进了手术方法,如视频 1 所示。在融合过程之前优先插入导丝有两个主要原因:确保在双束内窥镜下准确对准节段;避免在脊柱减压后插入导丝可能造成的椎管损伤风险。保持架的水平方向是一项关键技术,因为它不仅能有效恢复脊柱弯曲度,还能避免斜插带来的并发症,包括防止对侧椎管狭窄。这种策略性定位对于优化脊柱排列和减少先天性问题的可能性至关重要。4 在植入脊柱保持架后,背侧黄韧带的减压要谨慎进行,重点是保留韧带,以减少植入过程中对神经根的潜在刺激。这种细致入微的方法确保了在实现脊柱融合的同时,也大大降低了神经根受到刺激的风险,在脊柱稳定和神经元安全这两个目标之间取得了和谐的平衡。在这段视频演示中,我们重点介绍了 UBE-TLIF 手术的两大优势4,5:(1)通过保持架技术实现最佳的前凸和稳定性:本研究介绍了一种可提高 UBE-TLIF 精确性和有效性的骨架旋转技术。将融合骨笼以与骨板成 45° 角的方式小心插入,在三分之二的骨笼就位后停止这一过程。然后由助手小心地敲击最后的三分之一部分,确保骨架与椎体后缘完全对齐。这种方法与传统的斜插法不同,它通过增加椎间盘高度、节段前凸和整体腰椎曲度来显著改善脊柱前凸。此外,横向固定架定位可增强稳定性,其特点是与椎体的后方距离更大,从而最大限度地降低了固定架下沉或移位的可能性。(2) 在进行精细减压之前优先插入融合器笼6:通过在神经减压之前优先插入融合器笼,我们的方法强调了保留黄韧带的重要性。这种技术减少了手术过程中对神经的刺激,从而改善了患者的术后体验。UBE-TLIF 为治疗腰椎退行性疾病提供了一种安全、有效、恢复迅速的微创选择。它减少了对昂贵设备的依赖,从而促进了这一技术在社区医院的推广和应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信