{"title":"Clinical Efficacy of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion","authors":"YiBo Dong , YongTao Wang , Yang Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-TLIF) is an advanced, minimally invasive spinal surgical technique characterized by the use of 2 discrete portals—one for clear visualization and continuous irrigation and the other for the dexterous manipulation of surgical instruments. This configuration not only affords an expanded view (0° or 30°) but also enhances the freedom of movement for instruments, thereby augmenting the precision and flexibility of the surgery. The superiority of UBE-TLIF lies in its capacity to facilitate rapid postoperative recovery with minimal trauma, reduced intraoperative bleeding, abbreviated hospital stays, and significant amelioration of postoperative lower back pain. Comparatively, UBE-TLIF demonstrates equivalent fusion rates and clinical outcomes to traditional open surgeries while also increasing patient satisfaction.<span><span>1</span></span>, <span><span>2</span></span>, <span><span>3</span></span></div><div>In the UBE-TLIF procedure, the potential for nerve root disturbance due to surgical manipulation is a critical consideration. To minimize this, the authors have refined the surgical approach, as demonstrated in <span><span>Video 1</span></span>. The insertion of a guidewire is prioritized before the fusion process for 2 key reasons: to ensure accurate segmental alignment under the biportal endoscope and to avoid the risk of spinal canal injury that could arise if the guidewire were to be inserted after spinal decompression. The horizontal orientation of the cage is a pivotal technique, as it not only restores spinal curvature effectively but also circumvents the complications associated with oblique insertion, including the prevention of contralateral foraminal narrowing. This strategic positioning is vital for optimizing spinal alignment and reducing the likelihood of iatrogenic issues.<span><span><sup>4</sup></span></span> After cage implantation, the decompression of the dorsal ligamentum flavum is carefully executed, with an emphasis on preserving the ligament to lessen the potential irritation to the nerve roots during the implantation process. This nuanced approach ensures that while achieving spinal fusion, there is also a significant reduction in the risk of nerve root stimulation, striking a harmonious balance between the goals of spinal stabilization and neural element safety.</div><div>In this video demonstration, we highlight 2 key advantages of the UBE-TLIF procedure<span><span><sup>4</sup></span></span><sup>,</sup><span><span><sup>5</sup></span></span>: (1) Optimal lordosis and stability via cage technique: This study introduces a cage-rotation technique that enhances the accuracy and efficacy of UBE-TLIF. The fusion cage is meticulously inserted at a 45° angle to the lamina, with the process halted once two thirds of the cage is in place. An assistant then delicately taps the final one-third segment, ensuring the cage is perfectly aligned with the posterior vertebral edge. This method differs from the traditional oblique insertion, as it significantly improves the spinal lordosis by augmenting disc height, segmental lordosis, and overall lumbar curvature. Additionally, the traverse cage positioning provides enhanced stability, marked by a greater posterior distance from the vertebral body, thus minimizing the potential for cage subsidence or migration. (2) Prioritizing fusion cage insertion for refined decompression<span><span><sup>6</sup></span></span>: By prioritizing the fusion cage insertion before the neural decompression, our approach underscores the importance of preserving the ligamentum flavum. This technique reduces neural irritation during the procedure, leading to an improved patient experience postoperatively.</div><div>UBE-TLIF offers a safe, efficacious, and swiftly recuperative minimally invasive option for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. It diminishes reliance on costly equipment, thereby facilitating the dissemination and application of this technology in community hospitals.<span><span><sup>7</sup></span></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":"193 ","pages":"Pages 98-99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875024017686","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-TLIF) is an advanced, minimally invasive spinal surgical technique characterized by the use of 2 discrete portals—one for clear visualization and continuous irrigation and the other for the dexterous manipulation of surgical instruments. This configuration not only affords an expanded view (0° or 30°) but also enhances the freedom of movement for instruments, thereby augmenting the precision and flexibility of the surgery. The superiority of UBE-TLIF lies in its capacity to facilitate rapid postoperative recovery with minimal trauma, reduced intraoperative bleeding, abbreviated hospital stays, and significant amelioration of postoperative lower back pain. Comparatively, UBE-TLIF demonstrates equivalent fusion rates and clinical outcomes to traditional open surgeries while also increasing patient satisfaction.1, 2, 3
In the UBE-TLIF procedure, the potential for nerve root disturbance due to surgical manipulation is a critical consideration. To minimize this, the authors have refined the surgical approach, as demonstrated in Video 1. The insertion of a guidewire is prioritized before the fusion process for 2 key reasons: to ensure accurate segmental alignment under the biportal endoscope and to avoid the risk of spinal canal injury that could arise if the guidewire were to be inserted after spinal decompression. The horizontal orientation of the cage is a pivotal technique, as it not only restores spinal curvature effectively but also circumvents the complications associated with oblique insertion, including the prevention of contralateral foraminal narrowing. This strategic positioning is vital for optimizing spinal alignment and reducing the likelihood of iatrogenic issues.4 After cage implantation, the decompression of the dorsal ligamentum flavum is carefully executed, with an emphasis on preserving the ligament to lessen the potential irritation to the nerve roots during the implantation process. This nuanced approach ensures that while achieving spinal fusion, there is also a significant reduction in the risk of nerve root stimulation, striking a harmonious balance between the goals of spinal stabilization and neural element safety.
In this video demonstration, we highlight 2 key advantages of the UBE-TLIF procedure4,5: (1) Optimal lordosis and stability via cage technique: This study introduces a cage-rotation technique that enhances the accuracy and efficacy of UBE-TLIF. The fusion cage is meticulously inserted at a 45° angle to the lamina, with the process halted once two thirds of the cage is in place. An assistant then delicately taps the final one-third segment, ensuring the cage is perfectly aligned with the posterior vertebral edge. This method differs from the traditional oblique insertion, as it significantly improves the spinal lordosis by augmenting disc height, segmental lordosis, and overall lumbar curvature. Additionally, the traverse cage positioning provides enhanced stability, marked by a greater posterior distance from the vertebral body, thus minimizing the potential for cage subsidence or migration. (2) Prioritizing fusion cage insertion for refined decompression6: By prioritizing the fusion cage insertion before the neural decompression, our approach underscores the importance of preserving the ligamentum flavum. This technique reduces neural irritation during the procedure, leading to an improved patient experience postoperatively.
UBE-TLIF offers a safe, efficacious, and swiftly recuperative minimally invasive option for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. It diminishes reliance on costly equipment, thereby facilitating the dissemination and application of this technology in community hospitals.7
期刊介绍:
World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal''s mission is to:
-To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care.
-To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide.
-To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients.
Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS