Safety and Immunogenicity Study of a Bivalent Vaccine for Combined Prophylaxis of COVID-19 and Influenza in Non-Human Primates.

Abstract

Background: Influenza and SARS-CoV-2 viruses are two highly variable pathogens. We have developed a candidate bivalent live vaccine based on the strain of licensed A/Leningrad/17-based cold-adapted live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) of H3N2 subtype, which expressed SARS-CoV-2 immunogenic T-cell epitopes. A cassette encoding fragments of S and N proteins of SARS-CoV-2 was inserted into the influenza NA gene using the P2A autocleavage site. In this study, we present the results of preclinical evaluation of the developed bivalent vaccine in a non-human primate model.

Methods: Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) (n = 3 per group) were immunized intranasally with 7.5 lg EID₅₀ of the LAIV/CoV-2 bivalent vaccine, a control non-modified H3N2 LAIV or a placebo (chorioallantoic fluid) using a sprayer device, twice, with a 28-day interval. The blood samples were collected at days 0, 3, 28 and 35 for hematological and biochemical assessment. Safety was also assessed by monitoring body weight, body temperature and clinical signs of the disease. Immune responses to influenza virus were assessed both by determining serum antibody titers in hemagglutination inhibition assay, microneutralization assay and IgG ELISA. T-cell responses were measured both to influenza and SARS-CoV-2 antigens using ELISPOT and flow cytometry. Three weeks after the second immunization, animals were challenged with 10⁵ PFU of Delta SARS-CoV-2. The body temperature, weight and challenge virus shedding were monitored for 5 days post-challenge. In addition, virus titers in various organs and histopathology were evaluated on day 6 after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Results: There was no toxic effect of the immunizations on the hematological and coagulation hemostasis of animals. No difference in the dynamics of the average weight and thermometry results were found between the groups of animals. Both LAIV and LAIV/CoV-2 variants poorly replicated in the upper respiratory tract of rhesus macaques. Nevertheless, despite this low level of virus shedding, influenza-specific serum IgG responses were detected in the group of monkeys immunized with the LAIV/CoV-2 bivalent but not in the LAIV group. Furthermore, T-cell responses to both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 viruses were detected in the LAIV/CoV-2 vaccine group only. The animals were generally resistant to SARS-CoV-2 challenge, with minimal virus shedding in the placebo and LAIV groups. Histopathological changes in vaccinated animals were decreased compared to the PBS group, suggesting a protective effect of the chimeric vaccine candidate.

Conclusions: The candidate bivalent vaccine was safe and immunogenic for non-human primates and warrants its further evaluation in clinical trials.