Exploratory evidence maps for the WHO Classification of Tumours 5th edition for lung and thymus tumors.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Christine Giesen, Javier Del Águila Mejía, Subasri Armon, Ramon Cierco Jimenez, Nickolas Myles, Gabrielle Goldman-Lévy, Alberto Machado, Iciar Indave, Ian A Cree, Dilani Lokuhetty
{"title":"Exploratory evidence maps for the WHO Classification of Tumours 5th edition for lung and thymus tumors.","authors":"Christine Giesen, Javier Del Águila Mejía, Subasri Armon, Ramon Cierco Jimenez, Nickolas Myles, Gabrielle Goldman-Lévy, Alberto Machado, Iciar Indave, Ian A Cree, Dilani Lokuhetty","doi":"10.1007/s00428-024-03886-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The WHO Classification of Tumours (WCT) guides cancer diagnosis, treatment, and research. However, research evidence in pathology continuously changes, and new evidence emerges. Correct assessment of evidence in the WCT 5th edition (WCT-5) and identification of high level of evidence (LOE) studies based on study design are needed to improve future editions. We aimed at producing exploratory evidence maps for WCT-5 Thoracic Tumours, specifically lung and thymus tumors. We extracted citations from WCT-5, and imported and coded them in EPPI-Reviewer. The maps were plotted using EPPI-Mapper. Maps displayed tumor types (columns), descriptors (rows), and LOE (bubbles using a four-color code). We included 1434 studies addressing 51 lung, and 677 studies addressing 25 thymus tumor types from WCT-5 thoracic tumours volume. Overall, 87.7% (n = 1257) and 80.8% (n = 547) references were low, and 4.1% (n = 59) and 2.2% (n = 15) high LOE for lung and thymus tumors, respectively. Invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung (n = 215; 15.0%) and squamous cell carcinoma of the thymus (n = 93; 13.7%) presented the highest number of references. High LOE was observed for colloid adenocarcinoma of the lung (n = 11; 18.2%) and type AB thymoma (n = 4; 1.4%). Tumor descriptors with the highest number of citations were prognosis and prediction (n = 273; 19.0%) for lung, and epidemiology (n = 186; 28.0%) for thymus tumors. LOE was generally low for lung and thymus tumors. This study represents an initial step in the WCT Evidence Gap Map (WCT-EVI-MAP) project for mapping references in WCT-5 for all tumor types to inform future WCT editions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03886-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The WHO Classification of Tumours (WCT) guides cancer diagnosis, treatment, and research. However, research evidence in pathology continuously changes, and new evidence emerges. Correct assessment of evidence in the WCT 5th edition (WCT-5) and identification of high level of evidence (LOE) studies based on study design are needed to improve future editions. We aimed at producing exploratory evidence maps for WCT-5 Thoracic Tumours, specifically lung and thymus tumors. We extracted citations from WCT-5, and imported and coded them in EPPI-Reviewer. The maps were plotted using EPPI-Mapper. Maps displayed tumor types (columns), descriptors (rows), and LOE (bubbles using a four-color code). We included 1434 studies addressing 51 lung, and 677 studies addressing 25 thymus tumor types from WCT-5 thoracic tumours volume. Overall, 87.7% (n = 1257) and 80.8% (n = 547) references were low, and 4.1% (n = 59) and 2.2% (n = 15) high LOE for lung and thymus tumors, respectively. Invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung (n = 215; 15.0%) and squamous cell carcinoma of the thymus (n = 93; 13.7%) presented the highest number of references. High LOE was observed for colloid adenocarcinoma of the lung (n = 11; 18.2%) and type AB thymoma (n = 4; 1.4%). Tumor descriptors with the highest number of citations were prognosis and prediction (n = 273; 19.0%) for lung, and epidemiology (n = 186; 28.0%) for thymus tumors. LOE was generally low for lung and thymus tumors. This study represents an initial step in the WCT Evidence Gap Map (WCT-EVI-MAP) project for mapping references in WCT-5 for all tumor types to inform future WCT editions.

世界卫生组织肿瘤分类第 5 版关于肺和胸腺肿瘤的探索性证据图。
世界卫生组织肿瘤分类(WCT)是癌症诊断、治疗和研究的指南。然而,病理学研究证据不断变化,新证据不断涌现。为了改进今后的版本,需要对 WCT 第 5 版(WCT-5)中的证据进行正确评估,并根据研究设计确定高水平证据(LOE)研究。我们的目标是为 WCT-5 胸部肿瘤(特别是肺和胸腺肿瘤)绘制探索性证据图。我们从 WCT-5 中提取引文,并将其导入 EPPI-Reviewer 进行编码。地图使用 EPPI-Mapper 绘制。地图显示了肿瘤类型(列)、描述因子(行)和 LOE(使用四色代码的气泡)。我们纳入了 WCT-5 胸部肿瘤卷中涉及 51 种肺部肿瘤类型的 1434 项研究和涉及 25 种胸腺肿瘤类型的 677 项研究。总体而言,肺部肿瘤和胸腺肿瘤分别有87.7%(n = 1257)和80.8%(n = 547)的参考文献为低LOE,4.1%(n = 59)和2.2%(n = 15)的参考文献为高LOE。肺部浸润性非黏液腺癌(n = 215;15.0%)和胸腺鳞状细胞癌(n = 93;13.7%)的参考文献数最多。肺胶质腺癌(n = 11;18.2%)和AB型胸腺瘤(n = 4;1.4%)的LOE较高。被引用次数最多的肿瘤描述是肺部肿瘤的预后和预测(n = 273;19.0%)以及胸腺肿瘤的流行病学(n = 186;28.0%)。肺部和胸腺肿瘤的 LOE 一般较低。本研究是WCT证据差距图(WCT-EVI-MAP)项目的第一步,该项目旨在绘制WCT-5中所有肿瘤类型的参考文献,为未来的WCT版本提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Virchows Archiv
Virchows Archiv 医学-病理学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信