[Study participation in clozapine-resistant psychosis: a case study on decision-making capacity].

Q4 Medicine
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Pub Date : 2024-01-01
M den Toom, J B Zantvoord, A L Sutterland, J J Luykx, L M E Blanken, R Aarts, M B de Koning
{"title":"[Study participation in clozapine-resistant psychosis: a case study on decision-making capacity].","authors":"M den Toom, J B Zantvoord, A L Sutterland, J J Luykx, L M E Blanken, R Aarts, M B de Koning","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Informed consent is a requirement for medical research. Obtaining consent can be complex in patients with severe psychiatric disorders, often leading to their exclusion from study participation. Here, we discuss a case involving a patient with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia, highlighting the different perspectives of caregivers and physician-researchers, with an emphasis on decision-making capacity. The case illustrates the complexity of informed consent in this population, including the challenges in assessing decision-making capacity, ethical dilemmas, and potential improvements.<br />We conclude that improving existing standardized assessment tools, promoting inclusive approaches to research participation, and supporting patient representation in decision-making processes can contribute to the quality and integrity of medical research involving individuals with the most severe forms of psychiatric disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":23100,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","volume":"66 8","pages":"443-446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Informed consent is a requirement for medical research. Obtaining consent can be complex in patients with severe psychiatric disorders, often leading to their exclusion from study participation. Here, we discuss a case involving a patient with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia, highlighting the different perspectives of caregivers and physician-researchers, with an emphasis on decision-making capacity. The case illustrates the complexity of informed consent in this population, including the challenges in assessing decision-making capacity, ethical dilemmas, and potential improvements.
We conclude that improving existing standardized assessment tools, promoting inclusive approaches to research participation, and supporting patient representation in decision-making processes can contribute to the quality and integrity of medical research involving individuals with the most severe forms of psychiatric disorders.

[氯氮平耐药精神病的研究参与:关于决策能力的案例研究]。
知情同意是医学研究的一项要求。对于患有严重精神障碍的患者来说,获得同意可能很复杂,往往会导致他们被排除在研究之外。在此,我们讨论了一个涉及氯氮平耐药精神分裂症患者的病例,强调了护理人员和医生研究人员的不同视角,重点是决策能力。我们的结论是,改进现有的标准化评估工具、推广参与研究的包容性方法以及支持患者在决策过程中的代表权,都有助于提高涉及最严重精神障碍患者的医学研究的质量和完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信