Effects of Creatine Supplementation on the Performance, Physiological Response, and Body Composition Among Swimmers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Dongxiang Huang, Xiaobing Wang, Tomohiro Gonjo, Hideki Takagi, Bo Huang, Wenrui Huang, Qi Shan, Daniel Hung-Kay Chow
{"title":"Effects of Creatine Supplementation on the Performance, Physiological Response, and Body Composition Among Swimmers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Dongxiang Huang, Xiaobing Wang, Tomohiro Gonjo, Hideki Takagi, Bo Huang, Wenrui Huang, Qi Shan, Daniel Hung-Kay Chow","doi":"10.1186/s40798-024-00784-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although recent studies have increasingly focused on examining the potential benefits of creatine supplementation to improve performance in swimming events, the impact of creatine supplementation on swimming performance remains a topic of debate and controversy. A comprehensive meta-analytical review was undertaken to evaluate the effects of creatine supplementation on the performance, physiological response, and body composition among swimmers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research methodology adhered strictly to the guidelines outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A comprehensive search was conducted across six databases (Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and SPORTDiscus) until March 23, 2024. Eligible studies that investigated the impact of creatine supplementation on swimming time, physiological parameters, and body composition in swimmers were included. For the meta-analysis, a random-effects model was employed to determine the collective effect and assess variations across distinct subgroups defined by swimming time, physiological metrics, and body composition. Meta-regression analysis was conducted on datasets comprising ten or more studies. Standardized mean differences (SMD) along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. To evaluate the methodological rigor of the included studies, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was utilized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic review included seventeen studies with a total of 361 subjects. No significant differences were observed in the overall effect during single sprint swimming (SMD: -0.05, 95% CI: -0.26, 0.15; p = 0.61), repeated interval swimming (SMD: -0.11; 95% CI: -0.46, 0.25; p = 0.56), physiological response (SMD: 0.04, 95% CI: -0.16, 0.23; p = 0.71), and body composition (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI: -0.05, 0.41; p = 0.12) between creatine and placebo groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Creatine supplementation exhibited ineffectiveness in enhancing the performance, physiological response, and body composition among swimmers.</p>","PeriodicalId":21788,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine - Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"115"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11499511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine - Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-024-00784-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although recent studies have increasingly focused on examining the potential benefits of creatine supplementation to improve performance in swimming events, the impact of creatine supplementation on swimming performance remains a topic of debate and controversy. A comprehensive meta-analytical review was undertaken to evaluate the effects of creatine supplementation on the performance, physiological response, and body composition among swimmers.

Methods: The research methodology adhered strictly to the guidelines outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A comprehensive search was conducted across six databases (Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and SPORTDiscus) until March 23, 2024. Eligible studies that investigated the impact of creatine supplementation on swimming time, physiological parameters, and body composition in swimmers were included. For the meta-analysis, a random-effects model was employed to determine the collective effect and assess variations across distinct subgroups defined by swimming time, physiological metrics, and body composition. Meta-regression analysis was conducted on datasets comprising ten or more studies. Standardized mean differences (SMD) along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. To evaluate the methodological rigor of the included studies, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was utilized.

Results: The systematic review included seventeen studies with a total of 361 subjects. No significant differences were observed in the overall effect during single sprint swimming (SMD: -0.05, 95% CI: -0.26, 0.15; p = 0.61), repeated interval swimming (SMD: -0.11; 95% CI: -0.46, 0.25; p = 0.56), physiological response (SMD: 0.04, 95% CI: -0.16, 0.23; p = 0.71), and body composition (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI: -0.05, 0.41; p = 0.12) between creatine and placebo groups.

Conclusions: Creatine supplementation exhibited ineffectiveness in enhancing the performance, physiological response, and body composition among swimmers.

补充肌酸对游泳运动员成绩、生理反应和身体成分的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。
背景:尽管近期的研究越来越关注肌酸补充剂对提高游泳项目成绩的潜在益处,但肌酸补充剂对游泳成绩的影响仍是一个备受争议的话题。为了评估肌酸补充剂对游泳运动员的成绩、生理反应和身体成分的影响,我们进行了一项全面的荟萃分析综述:研究方法严格遵守《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA)的指导方针。截至 2024 年 3 月 23 日,在六个数据库(Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Scopus、Embase、PubMed 和 SPORTDiscus)中进行了全面检索。纳入了调查肌酸补充剂对游泳时间、生理参数和游泳运动员身体成分影响的合格研究。在进行荟萃分析时,采用随机效应模型来确定集体效应,并评估游泳时间、生理指标和身体成分所定义的不同亚组之间的差异。元回归分析是在包含十项或十项以上研究的数据集上进行的。计算了标准化平均差 (SMD) 及其相应的 95% 置信区间 (CI)。为评估所纳入研究的方法严谨性,采用了物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)量表:系统性综述共纳入 17 项研究,受试者总数为 361 人。在单次冲刺游泳(SMD:-0.05,95% CI:-0.26,0.15;P = 0.61)、重复间歇游泳(SMD:-0.11;95% CI:-0.46,0.25;P = 0.56)、生理反应(SMD:0.04,95% CI:-0.16,0.23;P = 0.71)和身体成分(SMD:0.18;95% CI:-0.05,0.41;P = 0.12)在肌酸组和安慰剂组之间的差异:结论:肌酸补充剂在提高游泳运动员的成绩、生理反应和身体成分方面效果不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Medicine - Open
Sports Medicine - Open SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信