Association between vegetable intake and major depressive disorder: results from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2018 and bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomisation.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Qi Wang, Zhaoxing Ou, Jiamin Chen, Liujun Li, Yuzhuo Chen, Dalin Ye
{"title":"Association between vegetable intake and major depressive disorder: results from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2018 and bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomisation.","authors":"Qi Wang, Zhaoxing Ou, Jiamin Chen, Liujun Li, Yuzhuo Chen, Dalin Ye","doi":"10.1017/S1368980024001691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the association between vegetable intake and major depressive disorder (MDD) through cross-sectional analysis and bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis was conducted on National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2005 to 2018 and the corresponding Food Patterns Equivalents Database (FPED). Genome-wide association study (GWAS) data were obtained from UK Biobank and Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) dataset. Logistic regression analysis was performed after calculating the weights of the samples. Inverse variance weighted, MR-Egger and weighted median methods were used to evaluate the causal effects.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score ≥ 10 was considered to indicate MDD. Low vegetable intake was defined as < 2 cups of vegetables per day.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>30 861 U.S. adults from NHANES. The GWAS data sample size related to vegetable intake were comprised 448 651 and 435 435 cases respectively, while the GWAS data sample size associated with MDD encompassed 500 199 cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 23 249 (75·33 %) participants with low vegetable intake. The relationship between vegetable intake and MDD was nonlinear. In the multivariate model adjusted for sex, age, education, marital status, poverty income ratio, ethnicity and BMI, participants with low vegetable intake were associated with an increased risk of MDD (OR = 1·53, 95 % CI (1·32, 1·77), <i>P</i> < 0·001). Bidirectional MR showed no causal effects between vegetable intake and MDD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis identified a significant relationship between vegetable intake and MDD, whereas the results from bidirectional two-sample MR did not support a causal role.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":"27 1","pages":"e220"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980024001691","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the association between vegetable intake and major depressive disorder (MDD) through cross-sectional analysis and bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR).

Design: Cross-sectional analysis was conducted on National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2005 to 2018 and the corresponding Food Patterns Equivalents Database (FPED). Genome-wide association study (GWAS) data were obtained from UK Biobank and Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) dataset. Logistic regression analysis was performed after calculating the weights of the samples. Inverse variance weighted, MR-Egger and weighted median methods were used to evaluate the causal effects.

Setting: A Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score ≥ 10 was considered to indicate MDD. Low vegetable intake was defined as < 2 cups of vegetables per day.

Participants: 30 861 U.S. adults from NHANES. The GWAS data sample size related to vegetable intake were comprised 448 651 and 435 435 cases respectively, while the GWAS data sample size associated with MDD encompassed 500 199 cases.

Results: There were 23 249 (75·33 %) participants with low vegetable intake. The relationship between vegetable intake and MDD was nonlinear. In the multivariate model adjusted for sex, age, education, marital status, poverty income ratio, ethnicity and BMI, participants with low vegetable intake were associated with an increased risk of MDD (OR = 1·53, 95 % CI (1·32, 1·77), P < 0·001). Bidirectional MR showed no causal effects between vegetable intake and MDD.

Conclusions: Cross-sectional analysis identified a significant relationship between vegetable intake and MDD, whereas the results from bidirectional two-sample MR did not support a causal role.

蔬菜摄入量与重度抑郁障碍之间的关系:2005-2018 年全国健康与营养调查和双向双样本孟德尔随机化的结果。
研究目的本研究旨在通过横断面分析和双向双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)评估蔬菜摄入量与重度抑郁症(MDD)之间的关联:对2005年至2018年的美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)数据以及相应的食物模式等值数据库(FPED)进行横断面分析。全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据来自英国生物库和精神病基因组学联盟(PGC)数据集。计算样本权重后进行逻辑回归分析。采用逆方差加权法、MR-Egger 法和加权中位数法评估因果效应:患者健康问卷-9得分≥10分被视为患有多发性抑郁症。低蔬菜摄入量的定义是每天蔬菜摄入量低于 2 杯:30 861名美国成年人来自NHANES。与蔬菜摄入量相关的 GWAS 数据样本量分别为 448 651 例和 435 435 例,而与 MDD 相关的 GWAS 数据样本量为 500 199 例:结果:蔬菜摄入量低的参与者有 23 249 人(75%-33%)。蔬菜摄入量与 MDD 之间的关系是非线性的。在调整了性别、年龄、教育程度、婚姻状况、贫困收入比、种族和体重指数的多变量模型中,蔬菜摄入量低的参与者患 MDD 的风险增加(OR = 1-53,95 % CI (1-32, 1-77),P < 0-001)。双向MR显示蔬菜摄入量与MDD之间没有因果关系:结论:横断面分析表明,蔬菜摄入量与多发性硬化症之间存在显著关系,而双向双样本 MR 的结果并不支持两者之间存在因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Nutrition
Public Health Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
521
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信