Surface Quality Evaluation of 3D-Printed Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced PETG Polymer During Turning: Experimental Analysis, ANN Modeling and Optimization.

IF 4.7 3区 工程技术 Q1 POLYMER SCIENCE
Polymers Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.3390/polym16202927
Anastasios Tzotzis, Dumitru Nedelcu, Simona-Nicoleta Mazurchevici, Panagiotis Kyratsis
{"title":"Surface Quality Evaluation of 3D-Printed Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced PETG Polymer During Turning: Experimental Analysis, ANN Modeling and Optimization.","authors":"Anastasios Tzotzis, Dumitru Nedelcu, Simona-Nicoleta Mazurchevici, Panagiotis Kyratsis","doi":"10.3390/polym16202927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This work presents an experimental analysis related to 3D-printed carbon-fiber-reinforced-polymer (CFRP) machining. A polyethylene-terephthalate-glycol (PETG)-based composite, reinforced with 20% carbon fibers, was selected as the test material. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of cutting conditions used in light operations on the generated surface quality of the 3D-printed specimens. For this purpose, nine specimens were fabricated and machined under a wide range of cutting parameters, including cutting speed, feed, and depth of cut. The generated surface roughness was measured with a mechanical gauge and the acquired data were used to develop a shallow artificial neural network (ANN) for prediction purposes, showing that a 3-6-1 structure is the best solution. Following this, a genetic algorithm (GA) was utilized to minimize the response, revealing that the optimal combination is 205 m/min speed, 0.0578 mm/rev feed, and 0.523 mm depth of cut, contributing to the fabrication of low friction parts and shafts with a high quality surface, as well as to the reduction of resource waste. A validation study supported the accuracy of the developed model, by exhibiting errors below 10%. Finally, a set of enhanced images were taken to assess the machined surfaces. It was found that 1.50 mm depth of cut is responsible for the generation of defects across the circumference of the specimens. Especially, combined with 150 m/min cutting speed and 0.11 mm/rev feed, more flaws are produced.</p>","PeriodicalId":20416,"journal":{"name":"Polymers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11511286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polymers","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16202927","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLYMER SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work presents an experimental analysis related to 3D-printed carbon-fiber-reinforced-polymer (CFRP) machining. A polyethylene-terephthalate-glycol (PETG)-based composite, reinforced with 20% carbon fibers, was selected as the test material. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of cutting conditions used in light operations on the generated surface quality of the 3D-printed specimens. For this purpose, nine specimens were fabricated and machined under a wide range of cutting parameters, including cutting speed, feed, and depth of cut. The generated surface roughness was measured with a mechanical gauge and the acquired data were used to develop a shallow artificial neural network (ANN) for prediction purposes, showing that a 3-6-1 structure is the best solution. Following this, a genetic algorithm (GA) was utilized to minimize the response, revealing that the optimal combination is 205 m/min speed, 0.0578 mm/rev feed, and 0.523 mm depth of cut, contributing to the fabrication of low friction parts and shafts with a high quality surface, as well as to the reduction of resource waste. A validation study supported the accuracy of the developed model, by exhibiting errors below 10%. Finally, a set of enhanced images were taken to assess the machined surfaces. It was found that 1.50 mm depth of cut is responsible for the generation of defects across the circumference of the specimens. Especially, combined with 150 m/min cutting speed and 0.11 mm/rev feed, more flaws are produced.

车削过程中三维打印碳纤维增强 PETG 聚合物的表面质量评估:实验分析、ANN建模与优化。
本研究对三维打印碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)加工进行了实验分析。试验材料选择了一种用 20% 碳纤维增强的聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯(PETG)基复合材料。研究的目的是评估轻操作中使用的切削条件对 3D 打印试样生成的表面质量的影响。为此,制作了九个试样,并在多种切削参数(包括切削速度、进给量和切削深度)下进行加工。生成的表面粗糙度通过机械量规进行测量,获得的数据用于开发浅层人工神经网络(ANN)进行预测,结果显示 3-6-1 结构是最佳解决方案。随后,利用遗传算法(GA)将响应最小化,结果表明最佳组合为 205 米/分钟的速度、0.0578 毫米/转的进给量和 0.523 毫米的切削深度,有助于制造低摩擦零件和具有高质量表面的轴,并减少资源浪费。验证研究证明了所开发模型的准确性,其误差低于 10%。最后,还拍摄了一组增强图像来评估加工表面。结果发现,1.50 毫米的切削深度会导致试样圆周上产生缺陷。尤其是在切削速度为 150 米/分钟、进给量为 0.11 毫米/转的情况下,产生的缺陷更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polymers
Polymers POLYMER SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
16.00%
发文量
4697
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: Polymers (ISSN 2073-4360) is an international, open access journal of polymer science. It publishes research papers, short communications and review papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Polymers provides an interdisciplinary forum for publishing papers which advance the fields of (i) polymerization methods, (ii) theory, simulation, and modeling, (iii) understanding of new physical phenomena, (iv) advances in characterization techniques, and (v) harnessing of self-assembly and biological strategies for producing complex multifunctional structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信