[IEHT vs. Regular Treatment - Are there Differences between the Two forms of Treatment in the Retrospective Course with regard to Individual Objective and Subjective Outcome Variables?]

Abstract

This retrospective follow-up study over one year (after discharge from the index treatment), compares the effects of inpatient-equivalent home treatment (IEHT) and regular psychiatric treatment using subjective and objective quality indicators. Using a 1:1 matching of cohorts (diagnosis, age, gender, number of previous treatments and severity of illness), 732 IEHT patients were assigned to a comparison group. Outcome data was taken from the routine data of the clinic database and the in-house basic documentation. In the subjective quality measure, patients and practitioners in regular psychiatric treatment reported a significantly higher improvement in condition. In terms of the objective quality measure, the number of further inpatient treatment days in the observation period, the two groups did not differ significantly, which can be interpreted as encouragement for the use of this new, increasingly established form of treatment.