Medicinal Plant Microbiomes: Factors Affecting Bacterial and Fungal Community Composition.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Planta medica Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1055/a-2420-0270
Daniel Zagal, James G Graham, Jonathan Bisson, Stefan J Green, Guido F Pauli
{"title":"Medicinal Plant Microbiomes: Factors Affecting Bacterial and Fungal Community Composition.","authors":"Daniel Zagal, James G Graham, Jonathan Bisson, Stefan J Green, Guido F Pauli","doi":"10.1055/a-2420-0270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This exploratory study was designed to identify factors implicating microbial influence on medicinal plant metabolomes. Utilizing a whole-microbiome approach, amplicon sequencing was used to identify the makeup of fungal and bacterial assemblages from endophytic (interior) and epiphytic (external) environments in two different sets of congeneric host-plant pairs, with collection of multiple samples of two medicinal plant species (<i>Actaea racemosa, Rhodiola rosea</i>) and two generic analogs (<i>Actaea rubra, Rhodiola integrifolia</i>). Diversity analysis of microbial assemblages revealed the influence of three primary factors driving variance in microbial community composition: host-plant taxonomy, the compartmentalization of microbial communities within discrete plant parts, and the scale of distance (microhabitat heterogeneity) between sampling locations. These three factors accounted for ~ 60% of variance within and between investigated microbiomes. Across all our collections, bacterial populations were more diverse than fungi (per compartment), and microbial density in epiphytic compartments (aerial parts, rhizosphere) were higher than those of endophytes (leaf and root). These comparative data point to key loci associated with variation between congeneric pairs and plant genera, providing insight into the complex and contrasting relationships found within this multi-kingdom coevolutionary relationship. Although reflective of only a limited set of botanical source materials, these data document the richness of a relatively unexplored component of the plant world and highlight the relevance of a whole-microbiome ecology-driven approach to botanical research and directed natural product investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20127,"journal":{"name":"Planta medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planta medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2420-0270","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This exploratory study was designed to identify factors implicating microbial influence on medicinal plant metabolomes. Utilizing a whole-microbiome approach, amplicon sequencing was used to identify the makeup of fungal and bacterial assemblages from endophytic (interior) and epiphytic (external) environments in two different sets of congeneric host-plant pairs, with collection of multiple samples of two medicinal plant species (Actaea racemosa, Rhodiola rosea) and two generic analogs (Actaea rubra, Rhodiola integrifolia). Diversity analysis of microbial assemblages revealed the influence of three primary factors driving variance in microbial community composition: host-plant taxonomy, the compartmentalization of microbial communities within discrete plant parts, and the scale of distance (microhabitat heterogeneity) between sampling locations. These three factors accounted for ~ 60% of variance within and between investigated microbiomes. Across all our collections, bacterial populations were more diverse than fungi (per compartment), and microbial density in epiphytic compartments (aerial parts, rhizosphere) were higher than those of endophytes (leaf and root). These comparative data point to key loci associated with variation between congeneric pairs and plant genera, providing insight into the complex and contrasting relationships found within this multi-kingdom coevolutionary relationship. Although reflective of only a limited set of botanical source materials, these data document the richness of a relatively unexplored component of the plant world and highlight the relevance of a whole-microbiome ecology-driven approach to botanical research and directed natural product investigations.

药用植物微生物群:影响细菌和真菌群落组成的因素
这项探索性研究旨在确定微生物对药用植物代谢组的影响因素。研究采用全微生物组方法,利用扩增子测序技术鉴定了两组不同同属宿主-植物对的内生(内部)和附生(外部)环境中真菌和细菌群的组成,并采集了两种药用植物物种(Actaea racemosa、Rhodiola rosea)和两种通用类似物(Actaea rubra、Rhodiola integrifolia)的多个样本。微生物群落的多样性分析表明,微生物群落组成的差异受三个主要因素的影响:寄主植物分类、离散植物部分内微生物群落的分区以及取样地点之间的距离(微生境异质性)。这三个因素占调查微生物群落内部和之间差异的 60%左右。在我们收集的所有样本中,细菌种群的多样性高于真菌(每个分区),附生分区(气生部分、根瘤)的微生物密度高于内生菌(叶和根)。这些比较数据指出了与同属植物对和植物属之间的变异有关的关键位点,为我们深入了解这种多生物界共同进化关系中的复杂和对比关系提供了线索。尽管这些数据只反映了有限的植物源材料,但它们记录了植物世界中相对未被探索的部分的丰富性,并强调了以整个微生物组生态学为驱动的方法对植物研究和定向天然产品调查的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Planta medica
Planta medica 医学-药学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
101
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Planta Medica is one of the leading international journals in the field of natural products – including marine organisms, fungi as well as micro-organisms – and medicinal plants. Planta Medica accepts original research papers, reviews, minireviews and perspectives from researchers worldwide. The journal publishes 18 issues per year. The following areas of medicinal plants and natural product research are covered: -Biological and Pharmacological Activities -Natural Product Chemistry & Analytical Studies -Pharmacokinetic Investigations -Formulation and Delivery Systems of Natural Products. The journal explicitly encourages the submission of chemically characterized extracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信