Haves and have-nots: socioeconomic position improves accuracy of machine learning algorithms for predicting high-impact chronic pain.

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Matthew C Morris, Hamidreza Moradi, Maryam Aslani, Sicong Sun, Cynthia Karlson, Emily J Bartley, Stephen Bruehl, Kristin R Archer, Patrick F Bergin, Kerry Kinney, Ashley L Watts, Felicitas A Huber, Gaarmel Funches, Subodh Nag, Burel R Goodin
{"title":"Haves and have-nots: socioeconomic position improves accuracy of machine learning algorithms for predicting high-impact chronic pain.","authors":"Matthew C Morris, Hamidreza Moradi, Maryam Aslani, Sicong Sun, Cynthia Karlson, Emily J Bartley, Stephen Bruehl, Kristin R Archer, Patrick F Bergin, Kerry Kinney, Ashley L Watts, Felicitas A Huber, Gaarmel Funches, Subodh Nag, Burel R Goodin","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Lower socioeconomic position (SEP) is associated with increased risk of developing chronic pain, experiencing more severe pain, and suffering greater pain-related disability. However, SEP is a multidimensional construct; there is a dearth of research on which SEP features are most strongly associated with high-impact chronic pain, the relative importance of SEP predictive features compared to established chronic pain correlates, and whether the relative importance of SEP predictive features differs by race and sex. This study used 3 machine learning algorithms to address these questions among adults in the 2019 National Health Interview Survey. Gradient boosting decision trees achieved the highest accuracy and discriminatory power for high-impact chronic pain. Results suggest that distinct SEP dimensions, including material resources (eg, ratio of family income to poverty threshold) and employment (ie, working in the past week, number of working adults in the family), are highly relevant predictors of high-impact chronic pain. Subgroup analyses compared the relative importance of predictive features of high-impact chronic pain in non-Hispanic Black vs White adults and men vs women. Whereas the relative importance of body mass index and owning/renting a residence was higher for non-Hispanic Black adults, the relative importance of working adults in the family and housing stability was higher for non-Hispanic White adults. Anxiety symptom severity, body mass index, and cigarette smoking had higher relevance for women, while housing stability and frequency of anxiety and depression had higher relevance for men. Results highlight the potential for machine learning algorithms to advance health equity research.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003451","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Lower socioeconomic position (SEP) is associated with increased risk of developing chronic pain, experiencing more severe pain, and suffering greater pain-related disability. However, SEP is a multidimensional construct; there is a dearth of research on which SEP features are most strongly associated with high-impact chronic pain, the relative importance of SEP predictive features compared to established chronic pain correlates, and whether the relative importance of SEP predictive features differs by race and sex. This study used 3 machine learning algorithms to address these questions among adults in the 2019 National Health Interview Survey. Gradient boosting decision trees achieved the highest accuracy and discriminatory power for high-impact chronic pain. Results suggest that distinct SEP dimensions, including material resources (eg, ratio of family income to poverty threshold) and employment (ie, working in the past week, number of working adults in the family), are highly relevant predictors of high-impact chronic pain. Subgroup analyses compared the relative importance of predictive features of high-impact chronic pain in non-Hispanic Black vs White adults and men vs women. Whereas the relative importance of body mass index and owning/renting a residence was higher for non-Hispanic Black adults, the relative importance of working adults in the family and housing stability was higher for non-Hispanic White adults. Anxiety symptom severity, body mass index, and cigarette smoking had higher relevance for women, while housing stability and frequency of anxiety and depression had higher relevance for men. Results highlight the potential for machine learning algorithms to advance health equity research.

富人与穷人:社会经济地位提高了机器学习算法预测高影响慢性疼痛的准确性。
摘要:较低的社会经济地位(SEP)与罹患慢性疼痛、经历更严重的疼痛和遭受更严重的疼痛相关残疾的风险增加有关。然而,社会经济地位是一个多维度的概念;关于哪些社会经济地位特征与影响较大的慢性疼痛最密切相关、社会经济地位预测特征与已确定的慢性疼痛相关因素相比的相对重要性,以及社会经济地位预测特征的相对重要性是否因种族和性别而异等方面的研究十分匮乏。本研究使用了 3 种机器学习算法来解决 2019 年全国健康访谈调查中成年人的这些问题。梯度提升决策树对高影响慢性疼痛的准确性和判别能力最高。结果表明,不同的 SEP 维度,包括物质资源(如家庭收入与贫困线的比率)和就业(如过去一周的工作情况、家庭中工作成年人的数量),是高度影响慢性疼痛的高度相关预测因素。亚组分析比较了非西班牙裔黑人与白人、男性与女性的高影响慢性疼痛预测特征的相对重要性。对于非西班牙裔黑人成年人来说,体重指数和拥有/租用住宅的相对重要性更高,而对于非西班牙裔白人成年人来说,家庭中工作的成年人和住房稳定性的相对重要性更高。焦虑症状严重程度、体重指数和吸烟与女性的相关性更高,而住房稳定性和焦虑抑郁频率与男性的相关性更高。研究结果凸显了机器学习算法在推进健康公平研究方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信