Early Intervention services in the era of genomic medicine: setting a research agenda.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Katherine E MacDuffie, Betty Cohn, Paul Appelbaum, Kyle B Brothers, Dan Doherty, Aaron J Goldenberg, Elizabeth Reynolds, Hadley Stevens Smith, Anne Wheeler, Joon-Ho Yu
{"title":"Early Intervention services in the era of genomic medicine: setting a research agenda.","authors":"Katherine E MacDuffie, Betty Cohn, Paul Appelbaum, Kyle B Brothers, Dan Doherty, Aaron J Goldenberg, Elizabeth Reynolds, Hadley Stevens Smith, Anne Wheeler, Joon-Ho Yu","doi":"10.1038/s41390-024-03668-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Newborn genomic sequencing (NBSeq) has the potential to substantially improve early detection of rare genetic conditions, allowing for pre-symptomatic treatment to optimize outcomes. Expanding conceptions of the clinical utility of NBSeq include earlier access to behavioral early intervention to support the acquisition of core motor, cognitive, communication, and adaptive skills during critical windows in early development. However, important questions remain about equitable access to early intervention programs for the growing number of infants identified with a genetic condition via NBSeq. We review the current NBSeq public health, clinical, and research landscape, and highlight ongoing international research efforts to collect population-level data on the utility of NBSeq for healthy newborns. We then explore the challenges facing a specific Early Intervention (EI) system-the US federally supported \"Part C\" system-for meeting the developmental needs of young children with genetic diagnoses, including structural limitations related to funding, variable eligibility criteria, and lack of collaboration with newborn screening programs. We conclude with a set of questions to guide future research at the intersection of NBSeq, newborn screening, and EI, which once answered, can steer future policy to ensure that EI service systems can optimally support the developmental needs of infants impacted by broader implementation of NBSeq. IMPACT: Existing literature on the clinical benefits of genome sequencing in newborns tends to focus on earlier provision of medical interventions, with less attention to the ongoing developmental needs of very young children with genetic conditions. This review outlines the developmental needs of a growing number of children diagnosed with genetic conditions in infancy and describes the strengths and limitations of the United States Early Intervention system (IDEA Part C) for meeting those needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03668-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Newborn genomic sequencing (NBSeq) has the potential to substantially improve early detection of rare genetic conditions, allowing for pre-symptomatic treatment to optimize outcomes. Expanding conceptions of the clinical utility of NBSeq include earlier access to behavioral early intervention to support the acquisition of core motor, cognitive, communication, and adaptive skills during critical windows in early development. However, important questions remain about equitable access to early intervention programs for the growing number of infants identified with a genetic condition via NBSeq. We review the current NBSeq public health, clinical, and research landscape, and highlight ongoing international research efforts to collect population-level data on the utility of NBSeq for healthy newborns. We then explore the challenges facing a specific Early Intervention (EI) system-the US federally supported "Part C" system-for meeting the developmental needs of young children with genetic diagnoses, including structural limitations related to funding, variable eligibility criteria, and lack of collaboration with newborn screening programs. We conclude with a set of questions to guide future research at the intersection of NBSeq, newborn screening, and EI, which once answered, can steer future policy to ensure that EI service systems can optimally support the developmental needs of infants impacted by broader implementation of NBSeq. IMPACT: Existing literature on the clinical benefits of genome sequencing in newborns tends to focus on earlier provision of medical interventions, with less attention to the ongoing developmental needs of very young children with genetic conditions. This review outlines the developmental needs of a growing number of children diagnosed with genetic conditions in infancy and describes the strengths and limitations of the United States Early Intervention system (IDEA Part C) for meeting those needs.

基因组医学时代的早期干预服务:制定研究议程。
新生儿基因组测序(NBSeq)有可能大大改善罕见遗传病的早期检测,从而进行症状前治疗,优化治疗效果。对 NBSeq 临床效用的扩展概念包括更早地获得行为早期干预,以支持在早期发育的关键窗口期获得核心运动、认知、沟通和适应技能。然而,对于越来越多通过 NBSeq 鉴定出患有遗传疾病的婴儿来说,如何公平地获得早期干预项目的服务仍是一个重要问题。我们回顾了当前 NBSeq 的公共卫生、临床和研究情况,并重点介绍了国际上正在开展的研究工作,以收集有关 NBSeq 对健康新生儿的效用的人群级数据。然后,我们探讨了特定的早期干预(EI)系统--美国联邦政府支持的 "C 部分 "系统--在满足遗传诊断幼儿的发展需求方面所面临的挑战,包括与资金、不同的资格标准以及与新生儿筛查项目缺乏合作有关的结构性限制。最后,我们提出了一系列问题,以指导未来在 NBSeq、新生儿筛查和幼儿教育交叉领域的研究,这些问题一旦得到解答,就能引导未来的政策,确保幼儿教育服务系统能为受到更广泛实施 NBSeq 影响的婴儿的发育需求提供最佳支持。影响:关于新生儿基因组测序临床益处的现有文献往往侧重于早期提供医疗干预,而较少关注患有遗传病的年幼儿童的持续发展需求。本综述概述了越来越多的婴儿期遗传病患儿的发展需求,并介绍了美国早期干预系统(IDEA C 部分)在满足这些需求方面的优势和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Research
Pediatric Research 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
473
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信