Short-term effects on physical activity level with web-based self-management support in people with COPD: a randomised controlled trial.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Tobias Stenlund, Åsa Karlsson, Per Liv, André Nyberg, Karin Wadell
{"title":"Short-term effects on physical activity level with web-based self-management support in people with COPD: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Tobias Stenlund, Åsa Karlsson, Per Liv, André Nyberg, Karin Wadell","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00394-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to evaluate short-term effects of a web-based self-management support on objectively measured physical activity (PA) compared to usual care in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We conducted a pragmatic randomised controlled trial including people with stable COPD within primary healthcare. Participants were randomised to intervention group, IG (access to the COPD Web, an interactive website to support self-management with focus on PA), or to control group, CG (usual care). Primary outcome at 3 months was change in accelerometry-measured daily steps analysed with ANCOVA, and secondary outcomes were self-reported PA, disease-related symptoms, and quality of life. Missing data in intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses were multiply imputed. One hundred and forty-six participants (n = 73/group), mean (SD) age 69.5 (6.7) years, FEV<sub>1pred</sub> 60.7 (19.1)% were included. The ITT analysis showed no significant difference in steps between the groups: 1295 steps (95% CI: [-365, 2955], p = 0.12), while the complete case analysis (n = 98) revealed a significant difference of 1492 steps (95% CI: [374, 2609], p = 0.01) in favour of IG. A significant increase in self-reported PA was seen in IG in both the ITT and complete case analysis. In summary, access to the COPD Web was insufficient to increase short-term PA level compared to usual care. However, among participants with complete step data, a clinically relevant effect on daily steps exceeding the minimal important difference was observed, partly explained by higher baseline PA than among dropouts. This indicates that access to the COPD Web may increase PA levels for some people with COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"34 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11502778/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-024-00394-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate short-term effects of a web-based self-management support on objectively measured physical activity (PA) compared to usual care in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We conducted a pragmatic randomised controlled trial including people with stable COPD within primary healthcare. Participants were randomised to intervention group, IG (access to the COPD Web, an interactive website to support self-management with focus on PA), or to control group, CG (usual care). Primary outcome at 3 months was change in accelerometry-measured daily steps analysed with ANCOVA, and secondary outcomes were self-reported PA, disease-related symptoms, and quality of life. Missing data in intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses were multiply imputed. One hundred and forty-six participants (n = 73/group), mean (SD) age 69.5 (6.7) years, FEV1pred 60.7 (19.1)% were included. The ITT analysis showed no significant difference in steps between the groups: 1295 steps (95% CI: [-365, 2955], p = 0.12), while the complete case analysis (n = 98) revealed a significant difference of 1492 steps (95% CI: [374, 2609], p = 0.01) in favour of IG. A significant increase in self-reported PA was seen in IG in both the ITT and complete case analysis. In summary, access to the COPD Web was insufficient to increase short-term PA level compared to usual care. However, among participants with complete step data, a clinically relevant effect on daily steps exceeding the minimal important difference was observed, partly explained by higher baseline PA than among dropouts. This indicates that access to the COPD Web may increase PA levels for some people with COPD.

基于网络的自我管理支持对慢性阻塞性肺病患者体育锻炼水平的短期影响:随机对照试验。
我们旨在评估基于网络的自我管理支持与常规护理相比,对慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者客观测量的体力活动(PA)的短期效果。我们开展了一项实用随机对照试验,对象包括初级医疗保健机构中的慢性阻塞性肺病稳定期患者。参与者被随机分配到干预组 IG(访问 COPD Web,这是一个支持自我管理的互动网站,重点关注 PA)或对照组 CG(常规护理)。3个月时的主要结果是加速度计测量的每日步数变化,采用方差分析,次要结果是自我报告的运动量、疾病相关症状和生活质量。对意向治疗(ITT)分析中的缺失数据进行了多重估算。146名参与者(n = 73/组),平均(标清)年龄为69.5(6.7)岁,FEV1pred为60.7(19.1)%。ITT 分析显示,两组间的步数无明显差异:1295 步(95% CI:[-365, 2955],p = 0.12),而完整病例分析(n = 98)显示,IG 组的步数显著增加了 1492 步(95% CI:[374, 2609],p = 0.01)。在 ITT 和完整病例分析中,IG 患者自我报告的 PA 均有明显增加。总之,与常规护理相比,访问 COPD Web 不足以提高短期 PA 水平。然而,在有完整步数数据的参与者中,观察到对每日步数的临床相关影响超过了最小重要差异,部分原因是基线PA高于辍学者。这表明,访问慢性阻塞性肺病网可能会提高一些慢性阻塞性肺病患者的运动量水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine is an open access, online-only, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the primary care management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic diseases. Papers published by the journal represent important advances of significance to specialists within the fields of primary care and respiratory medicine. We are particularly interested in receiving papers in relation to the following aspects of respiratory medicine, respiratory-related allergic diseases and tobacco control: epidemiology prevention clinical care service delivery and organisation of healthcare (including implementation science) global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信