Biofeedback efficacy for outlet dysfunction constipation: Clinical outcomes and predictors of response by a limited approach.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Christian Lambiase, Massimo Bellini, William E Whitehead, Stefan Lucian Popa, Riccardo Morganti, Giuseppe Chiarioni
{"title":"Biofeedback efficacy for outlet dysfunction constipation: Clinical outcomes and predictors of response by a limited approach.","authors":"Christian Lambiase, Massimo Bellini, William E Whitehead, Stefan Lucian Popa, Riccardo Morganti, Giuseppe Chiarioni","doi":"10.1111/nmo.14948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional defecation disorders (FDD) are a common etiology of refractory chronic constipation (CC). FDD diagnosis (dyssynergic defecation [DD] and inadequate defecatory propulsion [IDP]), requires diagnostic tests including anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET). Biofeedback (BF) is the treatment of choice for DD. The aims of our study were to evaluate: the outcome of BF in a group of constipated patients with defecatory disorders of any etiology; the efficacy of two simple diagnostic tools in predicting BF outcome in the short-term.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and thirty-one refractory CC patients failing the BET underwent BF therapy. Before BF, all patients underwent the following: ARM. Straining questionnaire. The answers were: \"belly muscles\"; \"anal muscles\"; \"both\"; \"Don't know/No answer.\" Digital rectal examination augmented by abdominal palpation on straining (augmented-DRE). The BF therapist was blinded to ARM, straining questionnaire, and augmented-DRE results.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Eighty-one patients responded to BF. Gender, age, and IBS-C showed no significant impact on BF response. Both DD and IDP responded equally to BF, while the rate of response in patients with isolated structural pelvic floor abnormalities was lower (p < 0.001). The answer \"anal muscles\" to straining questionnaire showed a strong association with BF response (p < 0.001). A lack in abdominal contraction and in anal relaxation on augmented-DRE were strongly associated with BF response (p < 0.01). Absence of manual maneuvers to facilitate defecation was associated with BF response (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions & inferences: </strong>BF is the therapy of choice for refractory constipation due to FDD of any etiology, inducing both clinical and anorectal physiology improvement in the short term. Comorbid IBS-C did not affect outcome while symptomatic isolated pelvic floor abnormalities appeared refractory to behavior treatment. The straining questionnaire and augmented-DRE outcomes showed a strong correlation with BF response and can be implemented in clinical practice to improve the management of constipated patients by prompting early referral to BF.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14948","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Functional defecation disorders (FDD) are a common etiology of refractory chronic constipation (CC). FDD diagnosis (dyssynergic defecation [DD] and inadequate defecatory propulsion [IDP]), requires diagnostic tests including anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET). Biofeedback (BF) is the treatment of choice for DD. The aims of our study were to evaluate: the outcome of BF in a group of constipated patients with defecatory disorders of any etiology; the efficacy of two simple diagnostic tools in predicting BF outcome in the short-term.

Methods: One hundred and thirty-one refractory CC patients failing the BET underwent BF therapy. Before BF, all patients underwent the following: ARM. Straining questionnaire. The answers were: "belly muscles"; "anal muscles"; "both"; "Don't know/No answer." Digital rectal examination augmented by abdominal palpation on straining (augmented-DRE). The BF therapist was blinded to ARM, straining questionnaire, and augmented-DRE results.

Key results: Eighty-one patients responded to BF. Gender, age, and IBS-C showed no significant impact on BF response. Both DD and IDP responded equally to BF, while the rate of response in patients with isolated structural pelvic floor abnormalities was lower (p < 0.001). The answer "anal muscles" to straining questionnaire showed a strong association with BF response (p < 0.001). A lack in abdominal contraction and in anal relaxation on augmented-DRE were strongly associated with BF response (p < 0.01). Absence of manual maneuvers to facilitate defecation was associated with BF response (p < 0.001).

Conclusions & inferences: BF is the therapy of choice for refractory constipation due to FDD of any etiology, inducing both clinical and anorectal physiology improvement in the short term. Comorbid IBS-C did not affect outcome while symptomatic isolated pelvic floor abnormalities appeared refractory to behavior treatment. The straining questionnaire and augmented-DRE outcomes showed a strong correlation with BF response and can be implemented in clinical practice to improve the management of constipated patients by prompting early referral to BF.

生物反馈疗法对出口功能障碍性便秘的疗效:有限方法的临床结果和反应预测因素。
背景:功能性排便障碍(FDD)是难治性慢性便秘(CC)的常见病因。诊断功能性排便障碍(排便失调 [DD] 和排便推动力不足 [IDP])需要进行诊断测试,包括肛门直肠测压 (ARM) 和气球排出试验 (BET)。生物反馈疗法(BF)是治疗排便障碍的首选方法。我们的研究目的是评估:生物反馈疗法在一组任何病因引起的排便障碍便秘患者中的疗效;两种简单诊断工具在短期内预测生物反馈疗法疗效的有效性:131名BET失败的难治性CC患者接受了BF治疗。在 BF 之前,所有患者都接受了以下检查:ARM。拉力问卷。答案为"腹部肌肉"、"肛门肌肉"、"两者"、"不知道/无答案"。通过腹部触诊增强拉力进行数字直肠检查(增强直肠检查)。BF治疗师对ARM、拉力问卷和增强直肠指诊(augmented-DRE)结果进行盲测:主要结果:81 名患者对 BF 有反应。性别、年龄和 IBS-C 对 BF 反应无明显影响。DD和IDP对BF的反应相同,而孤立的盆底结构异常患者的反应率较低(p 结论和推论:BF 是治疗任何病因的 FDD 引起的难治性便秘的首选疗法,可在短期内改善临床和肛门直肠生理功能。合并 IBS-C 不影响治疗效果,而有症状的孤立性盆底异常似乎对行为治疗无效。拉稀问卷和增强型肛门直肠指诊结果显示与盆底肌反应密切相关,可在临床实践中应用,通过促使患者尽早转诊至盆底肌治疗来改善便秘患者的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信