Influence of different sample preparation approaches on proteoform identification by top-down proteomics.

IF 36.1 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Philipp T Kaulich, Kyowon Jeong, Oliver Kohlbacher, Andreas Tholey
{"title":"Influence of different sample preparation approaches on proteoform identification by top-down proteomics.","authors":"Philipp T Kaulich, Kyowon Jeong, Oliver Kohlbacher, Andreas Tholey","doi":"10.1038/s41592-024-02481-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Top-down proteomics using mass spectrometry facilitates the identification of intact proteoforms, that is, all molecular forms of proteins. Multiple past advances have lead to the development of numerous sample preparation workflows. Here we systematically investigated the influence of different sample preparation steps on proteoform and protein identifications, including cell lysis, reduction and alkylation, proteoform enrichment, purification and fractionation. We found that all steps in sample preparation influence the subset of proteoforms identified (for example, their number, confidence, physicochemical properties and artificially generated modifications). The various sample preparation strategies resulted in complementary identifications, substantially increasing the proteome coverage. Overall, we identified 13,975 proteoforms from 2,720 proteins of human Caco-2 cells. The results presented can serve as suggestions for designing and adapting top-down proteomics sample preparation strategies to particular research questions. Moreover, we expect that the sampling bias and modifications identified at the intact protein level will also be useful in improving bottom-up proteomics approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":18981,"journal":{"name":"Nature Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":36.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-024-02481-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Top-down proteomics using mass spectrometry facilitates the identification of intact proteoforms, that is, all molecular forms of proteins. Multiple past advances have lead to the development of numerous sample preparation workflows. Here we systematically investigated the influence of different sample preparation steps on proteoform and protein identifications, including cell lysis, reduction and alkylation, proteoform enrichment, purification and fractionation. We found that all steps in sample preparation influence the subset of proteoforms identified (for example, their number, confidence, physicochemical properties and artificially generated modifications). The various sample preparation strategies resulted in complementary identifications, substantially increasing the proteome coverage. Overall, we identified 13,975 proteoforms from 2,720 proteins of human Caco-2 cells. The results presented can serve as suggestions for designing and adapting top-down proteomics sample preparation strategies to particular research questions. Moreover, we expect that the sampling bias and modifications identified at the intact protein level will also be useful in improving bottom-up proteomics approaches.

不同样品制备方法对自上而下蛋白质组学蛋白质形式鉴定的影响
采用质谱技术的自上而下蛋白质组学有助于鉴定完整的蛋白质形态,即蛋白质的所有分子形式。过去取得的多项进展推动了众多样品制备工作流程的发展。在此,我们系统地研究了不同样品制备步骤对蛋白形式和蛋白质鉴定的影响,包括细胞裂解、还原和烷基化、蛋白形式富集、纯化和分馏。我们发现,样品制备的所有步骤都会影响蛋白质形式鉴定的子集(例如,其数量、可信度、理化性质和人工生成的修饰)。不同的样品制备策略产生了互补的鉴定结果,大大提高了蛋白质组的覆盖率。总之,我们从人类 Caco-2 细胞的 2,720 种蛋白质中鉴定出了 13,975 种蛋白质形式。这些结果可作为设计和调整自上而下蛋白质组学样品制备策略以解决特定研究问题的建议。此外,我们预计在完整蛋白质水平上发现的取样偏差和修饰也将有助于改进自下而上的蛋白质组学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Methods
Nature Methods 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
58.70
自引率
1.70%
发文量
326
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Methods is a monthly journal that focuses on publishing innovative methods and substantial enhancements to fundamental life sciences research techniques. Geared towards a diverse, interdisciplinary readership of researchers in academia and industry engaged in laboratory work, the journal offers new tools for research and emphasizes the immediate practical significance of the featured work. It publishes primary research papers and reviews recent technical and methodological advancements, with a particular interest in primary methods papers relevant to the biological and biomedical sciences. This includes methods rooted in chemistry with practical applications for studying biological problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信