Philipp T. Kaulich, Kyowon Jeong, Oliver Kohlbacher, Andreas Tholey
{"title":"Influence of different sample preparation approaches on proteoform identification by top-down proteomics","authors":"Philipp T. Kaulich, Kyowon Jeong, Oliver Kohlbacher, Andreas Tholey","doi":"10.1038/s41592-024-02481-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Top-down proteomics using mass spectrometry facilitates the identification of intact proteoforms, that is, all molecular forms of proteins. Multiple past advances have lead to the development of numerous sample preparation workflows. Here we systematically investigated the influence of different sample preparation steps on proteoform and protein identifications, including cell lysis, reduction and alkylation, proteoform enrichment, purification and fractionation. We found that all steps in sample preparation influence the subset of proteoforms identified (for example, their number, confidence, physicochemical properties and artificially generated modifications). The various sample preparation strategies resulted in complementary identifications, substantially increasing the proteome coverage. Overall, we identified 13,975 proteoforms from 2,720 proteins of human Caco-2 cells. The results presented can serve as suggestions for designing and adapting top-down proteomics sample preparation strategies to particular research questions. Moreover, we expect that the sampling bias and modifications identified at the intact protein level will also be useful in improving bottom-up proteomics approaches. A systematic analysis of the influence of different sample preparation steps on proteoform identification by top-down proteomics serves as a useful reference for designing appropriate workflows for specific research questions.","PeriodicalId":18981,"journal":{"name":"Nature Methods","volume":"21 12","pages":"2397-2407"},"PeriodicalIF":36.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-024-02481-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-024-02481-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Top-down proteomics using mass spectrometry facilitates the identification of intact proteoforms, that is, all molecular forms of proteins. Multiple past advances have lead to the development of numerous sample preparation workflows. Here we systematically investigated the influence of different sample preparation steps on proteoform and protein identifications, including cell lysis, reduction and alkylation, proteoform enrichment, purification and fractionation. We found that all steps in sample preparation influence the subset of proteoforms identified (for example, their number, confidence, physicochemical properties and artificially generated modifications). The various sample preparation strategies resulted in complementary identifications, substantially increasing the proteome coverage. Overall, we identified 13,975 proteoforms from 2,720 proteins of human Caco-2 cells. The results presented can serve as suggestions for designing and adapting top-down proteomics sample preparation strategies to particular research questions. Moreover, we expect that the sampling bias and modifications identified at the intact protein level will also be useful in improving bottom-up proteomics approaches. A systematic analysis of the influence of different sample preparation steps on proteoform identification by top-down proteomics serves as a useful reference for designing appropriate workflows for specific research questions.
期刊介绍:
Nature Methods is a monthly journal that focuses on publishing innovative methods and substantial enhancements to fundamental life sciences research techniques. Geared towards a diverse, interdisciplinary readership of researchers in academia and industry engaged in laboratory work, the journal offers new tools for research and emphasizes the immediate practical significance of the featured work. It publishes primary research papers and reviews recent technical and methodological advancements, with a particular interest in primary methods papers relevant to the biological and biomedical sciences. This includes methods rooted in chemistry with practical applications for studying biological problems.