The Effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors on Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks in Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Diuretic Therapy.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ilke Erbay, Naile Eris Gudul, Ugur Kokturk, Pelin Aladag, Meltem Kandazoglu, Ahmet Avci
{"title":"The Effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors on Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks in Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Diuretic Therapy.","authors":"Ilke Erbay, Naile Eris Gudul, Ugur Kokturk, Pelin Aladag, Meltem Kandazoglu, Ahmet Avci","doi":"10.1159/000542172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are the standard treatment for patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤35%) to reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death. Loop diuretics can cause electrolyte imbalances, leading to an increased incidence of ICD shocks. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have shown cardiovascular benefits in patients with heart failure (HF), but their effects on ventricular arrhythmias and ICD shocks, particularly in patients receiving different doses of loop diuretics, are not fully understood. This study evaluated the effects of furosemide dose and SGLT2i use on ICD shocks in HF patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>HFrEF patients using oral furosemide and undergoing ICD implantation in our clinic were followed for 12 months to monitor ICD shocks for ventricular arrhythmias. They were grouped according to daily oral furosemide dose and SGLT2i use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 175 patients, the use of high-dose furosemide (>80 mg/day) was significantly higher in the ICD shock group compared to the non-shock group (38.8% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.001), while the use of SGLT2i was lower (19.4% vs. 45.4%, p < 0.001). ICD shocks occurred in 67.6% of patients on high-dose furosemide without SGLT2i and 30.0% with SGLT2i (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified the absence of SGLT2i as an independent predictor of ICD shocks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SGLT2i was associated with reduced ventricular arrhythmias and ICD shocks in HF patients, even when high doses of furosemide were used. The absence of SGLT2i in HF treatment was an independent predictor of ICD shocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":18455,"journal":{"name":"Medical Principles and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Principles and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542172","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are the standard treatment for patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤35%) to reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death. Loop diuretics can cause electrolyte imbalances, leading to an increased incidence of ICD shocks. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have shown cardiovascular benefits in patients with heart failure (HF), but their effects on ventricular arrhythmias and ICD shocks, particularly in patients receiving different doses of loop diuretics, are not fully understood. This study evaluated the effects of furosemide dose and SGLT2i use on ICD shocks in HF patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Materials and methods: HFrEF patients using oral furosemide and undergoing ICD implantation in our clinic were followed for 12 months to monitor ICD shocks for ventricular arrhythmias. They were grouped according to daily oral furosemide dose and SGLT2i use.

Results: Out of 175 patients, the use of high-dose furosemide (>80 mg/day) was significantly higher in the ICD shock group compared to the non-shock group (38.8% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.001), while the use of SGLT2i was lower (19.4% vs. 45.4%, p < 0.001). ICD shocks occurred in 67.6% of patients on high-dose furosemide without SGLT2i and 30.0% with SGLT2i (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified the absence of SGLT2i as an independent predictor of ICD shocks.

Conclusions: SGLT2i was associated with reduced ventricular arrhythmias and ICD shocks in HF patients, even when high doses of furosemide were used. The absence of SGLT2i in HF treatment was an independent predictor of ICD shocks.

钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2 抑制剂对接受利尿剂治疗的心衰患者植入式心律转复除颤器 (ICD) 震动的影响。
目的:植入式心脏除颤器(ICD)是左心室射血分数(LVEF≤35%)降低患者的标准治疗方法,可降低心脏性猝死的风险。环利尿剂可导致电解质失衡,从而增加 ICD 电击的发生率。钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)对心力衰竭(HF)患者的心血管有益,但它们对室性心律失常和ICD电击的影响,尤其是对接受不同剂量襻利尿剂的患者的影响尚未完全明了。本研究评估了呋塞米剂量和 SGLT2i 的使用对左室射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者 ICD 震动的影响。材料和方法:对在本诊所使用口服呋塞米并接受 ICD 植入术的 HFrEF 患者进行了为期 12 个月的随访,以监测 ICD 震动对室性心律失常的影响。根据每日口服呋塞米的剂量和 SGLT2i 的使用情况对患者进行分组:在 175 名患者中,ICD 休克组患者使用大剂量呋塞米(80 毫克/天)的比例明显高于非休克组(38.8% 对 16.7%,p = 0.001),而使用 SGLT2i 的比例较低(19.4% 对 45.4%,p <0.001)。在使用大剂量呋塞米(不含 SGLT2i)的患者中,67.6% 发生了 ICD 电击;在使用 SGLT2i 的患者中,30.0% 发生了 ICD 电击(p <0.001)。多变量分析发现,不使用 SGLT2i 是 ICD 电击的独立预测因素:结论:即使使用大剂量呋塞米,SGLT2i 也能减少 HF 患者的室性心律失常和 ICD 电击。在心房颤动治疗中不使用 SGLT2i 是 ICD 电击的一个独立预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Principles and Practice
Medical Principles and Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Medical Principles and Practice'', as the journal of the Health Sciences Centre, Kuwait University, aims to be a publication of international repute that will be a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信