Determining diagnostic sensitivity loss limits for sample pooling in duplex rtPCR surveillance testing: Theileria orientalis and Anaplasma marginale.

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Catharine Burgess, S Michelle Todd, Laura Hungerford, Kevin Lahmers
{"title":"Determining diagnostic sensitivity loss limits for sample pooling in duplex rtPCR surveillance testing: <i>Theileria orientalis</i> and <i>Anaplasma marginale</i>.","authors":"Catharine Burgess, S Michelle Todd, Laura Hungerford, Kevin Lahmers","doi":"10.1177/10406387241287516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To expand surveillance testing capacity through sample pooling, a thorough understanding is needed of how sample dilution through pooling affects the sensitivity of candidate assays. We validated a robust and representative framework for assessing the dilution effect of sample pooling using duplex rtPCR surveillance of <i>Theileria orientalis</i> and <i>Anaplasma marginale</i>, both of which are causative agents of severe anemia in cattle and a serious threat to the cattle industry in Virginia and many other states. We used 200 known-positive samples with Ct values representative of typical surveillance results in a series of pools in which we re-tested each sample individually, followed by each sample diluted in equal volumes with negative samples to make pools of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 total samples. We compared the Ct values of the individual positives with the Ct values of each pool size to determine if Ct values increase past the limit of detection in the 45-cycle assay. We observed a maximum of 2% sensitivity loss (no more than 2 of 100 samples returned a false-negative result) for both <i>T. orientalis</i> and <i>A. marginale</i> during the pooling series, with lower-than-expected average Ct increase and sensitivity loss. We conclude that pooling up to 10 samples would be acceptable for regional surveillance of <i>T. orientalis</i> and <i>A. marginale</i> using our rtPCR assay. The described strategy is applicable to validate pooling for a wide range of single and duplex rtPCR assays, which could expand efficient disease surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":17579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559834/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10406387241287516","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To expand surveillance testing capacity through sample pooling, a thorough understanding is needed of how sample dilution through pooling affects the sensitivity of candidate assays. We validated a robust and representative framework for assessing the dilution effect of sample pooling using duplex rtPCR surveillance of Theileria orientalis and Anaplasma marginale, both of which are causative agents of severe anemia in cattle and a serious threat to the cattle industry in Virginia and many other states. We used 200 known-positive samples with Ct values representative of typical surveillance results in a series of pools in which we re-tested each sample individually, followed by each sample diluted in equal volumes with negative samples to make pools of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 total samples. We compared the Ct values of the individual positives with the Ct values of each pool size to determine if Ct values increase past the limit of detection in the 45-cycle assay. We observed a maximum of 2% sensitivity loss (no more than 2 of 100 samples returned a false-negative result) for both T. orientalis and A. marginale during the pooling series, with lower-than-expected average Ct increase and sensitivity loss. We conclude that pooling up to 10 samples would be acceptable for regional surveillance of T. orientalis and A. marginale using our rtPCR assay. The described strategy is applicable to validate pooling for a wide range of single and duplex rtPCR assays, which could expand efficient disease surveillance.

确定双重 rtPCR 监测测试中样本池的诊断灵敏度损失限度:东方壁虱和边缘疟原虫。
要通过样本池扩大监控检测能力,就需要全面了解样本池的样本稀释如何影响候选检测方法的灵敏度。我们利用对东方尺蠖和边疫阿纳疟原虫的双重 rtPCR 监控验证了评估样本池稀释效应的稳健且具有代表性的框架,这两种病毒都是牛严重贫血症的致病菌,对弗吉尼亚州和其他许多州的养牛业构成严重威胁。我们使用了 200 份已知阳性样本,这些样本的 Ct 值代表了一系列样本池中的典型监测结果,在这些样本池中,我们对每份样本进行了单独复检,然后将每份样本与阴性样本等量稀释,组成了 2、4、6、8 和 10 份样本池。我们将单个阳性样本的 Ct 值与每个样本池的 Ct 值进行了比较,以确定 Ct 值的增加是否超过了 45 周期检测的检测极限。我们观察到,在汇集过程中,东方蓟马和边缘蓟马的灵敏度最高下降了 2%(100 份样本中没有超过 2 份出现假阴性结果),平均 Ct 值的增加和灵敏度的下降均低于预期。我们的结论是,使用我们的 rtPCR 检测方法对东方蓟马和马立克氏疟原虫进行区域性监测时,最多汇集 10 份样本是可以接受的。所描述的策略适用于验证各种单式和双式 rtPCR 检测方法的集合,这可以扩大疾病监测的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation (J Vet Diagn Invest) is an international peer-reviewed journal published bimonthly in English by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians (AAVLD). JVDI is devoted to all aspects of veterinary laboratory diagnostic science including the major disciplines of anatomic pathology, bacteriology/mycology, clinical pathology, epidemiology, immunology, laboratory information management, molecular biology, parasitology, public health, toxicology, and virology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信