Michael Y Qiu, Charles B Suskin, Mohamed A Zayed, Guy M Genin, Joshua W Osbun
{"title":"Energy barriers govern catheter herniation during endovascular procedures: a 2.5D vascular flow model analysis.","authors":"Michael Y Qiu, Charles B Suskin, Mohamed A Zayed, Guy M Genin, Joshua W Osbun","doi":"10.1098/rsif.2024.0333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endovascular procedures rely on navigating guidewires, catheters and other devices through tortuous vasculature to treat disease. A critical challenge in these procedures is catheter herniation, in which the device deviates from its intended path, often irrecoverably. To elucidate the mechanics of herniation, we developed a physical flow model of the aortic arch that enables direct measurement of device curvature during experimentally simulated neuroendovascular procedures conducted from an upper arterial access. Combined with measurements of initial, unstressed device shapes and flexural rigidities, the method enables the experimental estimation of the device bending energies during these simulated procedures. Characteristic energy profiles revealed distinct stages in both herniation and successful navigation, governed by the interplay between device properties and vascular anatomy. A deterministic progression from successful navigation to herniation was identified, with catheter systems following paths determined by measurable energy barriers. Increasing guidewire stiffness or decreasing catheter stiffness reduced the energy barrier for successful navigation while increasing that for herniation. This framework enables the prediction of endovascular herniation risk and offers unique insight into improved device design and clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":17488,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface","volume":"21 219","pages":"20240333"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2024.0333","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Endovascular procedures rely on navigating guidewires, catheters and other devices through tortuous vasculature to treat disease. A critical challenge in these procedures is catheter herniation, in which the device deviates from its intended path, often irrecoverably. To elucidate the mechanics of herniation, we developed a physical flow model of the aortic arch that enables direct measurement of device curvature during experimentally simulated neuroendovascular procedures conducted from an upper arterial access. Combined with measurements of initial, unstressed device shapes and flexural rigidities, the method enables the experimental estimation of the device bending energies during these simulated procedures. Characteristic energy profiles revealed distinct stages in both herniation and successful navigation, governed by the interplay between device properties and vascular anatomy. A deterministic progression from successful navigation to herniation was identified, with catheter systems following paths determined by measurable energy barriers. Increasing guidewire stiffness or decreasing catheter stiffness reduced the energy barrier for successful navigation while increasing that for herniation. This framework enables the prediction of endovascular herniation risk and offers unique insight into improved device design and clinical decision-making.
期刊介绍:
J. R. Soc. Interface welcomes articles of high quality research at the interface of the physical and life sciences. It provides a high-quality forum to publish rapidly and interact across this boundary in two main ways: J. R. Soc. Interface publishes research applying chemistry, engineering, materials science, mathematics and physics to the biological and medical sciences; it also highlights discoveries in the life sciences of relevance to the physical sciences. Both sides of the interface are considered equally and it is one of the only journals to cover this exciting new territory. J. R. Soc. Interface welcomes contributions on a diverse range of topics, including but not limited to; biocomplexity, bioengineering, bioinformatics, biomaterials, biomechanics, bionanoscience, biophysics, chemical biology, computer science (as applied to the life sciences), medical physics, synthetic biology, systems biology, theoretical biology and tissue engineering.