Urinary L-FABP Assay in the Detection of Acute Kidney Injury following Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Roshni Mitra, Eleni Tholouli, Azita Rajai, Ananya Saha, Sandip Mitra, Nicos Mitsides
{"title":"Urinary L-FABP Assay in the Detection of Acute Kidney Injury following Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.","authors":"Roshni Mitra, Eleni Tholouli, Azita Rajai, Ananya Saha, Sandip Mitra, Nicos Mitsides","doi":"10.3390/jpm14101046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a condition that affects a significant proportion of acutely unwell patients and is associated with a high mortality rate. Patients undergoing haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are in an extremely high group for AKI. Identifying a biomarker or panel of markers that can reliably identify at-risk individuals undergoing HSCT can potentially impact management and outcomes. Early identification of AKI can reduce its severity and improve prognosis. We evaluated the urinary Liver type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP), a tubular stress and injury biomarker both as an ELISA and a point of care (POC) assay for AKI detection in HSCT. <b>Methods</b>: 85 patients that had undergone autologous and allogenic HSCT (35 and 50, respectively) had urinary L-FABP (uL-FABP) measured by means of a quantitative ELISA and a semi-quantitative POC at baseline, day 0 and 7 post-transplantation. Serum creatinine (SCr) was also measured at the same time. Patients were followed up for 30 days for the occurrence of AKI and up to 18 months for mortality. The sensitivity and specificity of uL-FABP as an AKI biomarker were evaluated and compared to the performance of sCr using ROC curve analysis and logistic regression. <b>Results</b>: 39% of participants developed AKI within 1 month of their transplantation. The incidence of AKI was higher in the allogenic group than in the autologous HTSC group (57% vs. 26%, <i>p</i> = 0.008) with the median time to AKI being 25 [range 9-30] days. This group was younger (median age 59 vs. 63, <i>p</i> < 0.001) with a lower percentage of multiple myeloma as the primary diagnosis (6% vs. 88%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The median time to AKI diagnosis was 25 [range 9-30] days. uL-FABP (mcg/gCr) at baseline, day of transplant and on the 7th day post-transplant were 1.61, 5.39 and 10.27, respectively, for the allogenic group and 0.58, 4.36 and 5.14 for the autologous group. Both SCr and uL-FABP levels rose from baseline to day 7 post-transplantation, while the AUC for predicting AKI for baseline, day 0 and day 7 post-transplant was 0.54, 0.59 and 0.62 for SCr and for 0.49, 0.43 and 0.49 uL-FABP, respectively. Univariate logistic regression showed the risk of AKI to be increased in patients with allogenic HSCT (<i>p</i> = 0.004, 95%CI [0.1; 0.65]) and in those with impaired renal function at baseline (<i>p</i> = 0.01, 95%CI [0.02, 0.54]). The risk of AKI was also significantly associated with SCr levels on day 7 post-transplant (<i>p</i> = 0.03, 95%CI [1; 1.03]). Multivariate logistic regression showed the type of HSCT to be the strongest predictor of AKI at all time points, while SCr levels at days 0 and 7 also correlated with increased risk in the model that included uL-FABP levels at the corresponding time points. The POC device for uL-FABP measurement correlated with ELISA (<i>p</i> < 0.001, Spearman 'correlation' = 0.54) <b>Conclusions</b>: The urinary biomarker uL-FABP did not demonstrate an independent predictive value in the detection of AKI at all stages. The most powerful risk predictor of AKI in this setting appears to be allograft recipients and baseline renal impairment, highlighting the importance of clinical risk stratification. Urinary L-FAPB as a POC biomarker was comparable to ELISA, which provides an opportunity for simple and rapid testing. However, the utility of LFABP in AKI is unclear and needs further exploration. Whether screening through rapid testing of uL-FABP can prevent or reduce AKI severity is unknown and merits further studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11508925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14101046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a condition that affects a significant proportion of acutely unwell patients and is associated with a high mortality rate. Patients undergoing haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are in an extremely high group for AKI. Identifying a biomarker or panel of markers that can reliably identify at-risk individuals undergoing HSCT can potentially impact management and outcomes. Early identification of AKI can reduce its severity and improve prognosis. We evaluated the urinary Liver type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP), a tubular stress and injury biomarker both as an ELISA and a point of care (POC) assay for AKI detection in HSCT. Methods: 85 patients that had undergone autologous and allogenic HSCT (35 and 50, respectively) had urinary L-FABP (uL-FABP) measured by means of a quantitative ELISA and a semi-quantitative POC at baseline, day 0 and 7 post-transplantation. Serum creatinine (SCr) was also measured at the same time. Patients were followed up for 30 days for the occurrence of AKI and up to 18 months for mortality. The sensitivity and specificity of uL-FABP as an AKI biomarker were evaluated and compared to the performance of sCr using ROC curve analysis and logistic regression. Results: 39% of participants developed AKI within 1 month of their transplantation. The incidence of AKI was higher in the allogenic group than in the autologous HTSC group (57% vs. 26%, p = 0.008) with the median time to AKI being 25 [range 9-30] days. This group was younger (median age 59 vs. 63, p < 0.001) with a lower percentage of multiple myeloma as the primary diagnosis (6% vs. 88%, p < 0.001). The median time to AKI diagnosis was 25 [range 9-30] days. uL-FABP (mcg/gCr) at baseline, day of transplant and on the 7th day post-transplant were 1.61, 5.39 and 10.27, respectively, for the allogenic group and 0.58, 4.36 and 5.14 for the autologous group. Both SCr and uL-FABP levels rose from baseline to day 7 post-transplantation, while the AUC for predicting AKI for baseline, day 0 and day 7 post-transplant was 0.54, 0.59 and 0.62 for SCr and for 0.49, 0.43 and 0.49 uL-FABP, respectively. Univariate logistic regression showed the risk of AKI to be increased in patients with allogenic HSCT (p = 0.004, 95%CI [0.1; 0.65]) and in those with impaired renal function at baseline (p = 0.01, 95%CI [0.02, 0.54]). The risk of AKI was also significantly associated with SCr levels on day 7 post-transplant (p = 0.03, 95%CI [1; 1.03]). Multivariate logistic regression showed the type of HSCT to be the strongest predictor of AKI at all time points, while SCr levels at days 0 and 7 also correlated with increased risk in the model that included uL-FABP levels at the corresponding time points. The POC device for uL-FABP measurement correlated with ELISA (p < 0.001, Spearman 'correlation' = 0.54) Conclusions: The urinary biomarker uL-FABP did not demonstrate an independent predictive value in the detection of AKI at all stages. The most powerful risk predictor of AKI in this setting appears to be allograft recipients and baseline renal impairment, highlighting the importance of clinical risk stratification. Urinary L-FAPB as a POC biomarker was comparable to ELISA, which provides an opportunity for simple and rapid testing. However, the utility of LFABP in AKI is unclear and needs further exploration. Whether screening through rapid testing of uL-FABP can prevent or reduce AKI severity is unknown and merits further studies.

检测造血干细胞移植后急性肾损伤的尿液 L-FABP 分析。
背景:急性肾损伤(AKI)是影响大部分急性病患者的一种疾病,死亡率很高。接受造血干细胞移植(HSCT)的患者是急性肾损伤的高发人群。找到一种或一组能可靠识别造血干细胞移植高危患者的生物标志物,将对治疗和预后产生潜在影响。早期识别 AKI 可以降低其严重程度并改善预后。我们评估了尿液肝型脂肪酸结合蛋白 (L-FABP),这是一种肾小管应激和损伤生物标记物,可作为 ELISA 和护理点 (POC) 检测方法用于造血干细胞移植中的 AKI 检测。方法:85 名接受自体和异基因造血干细胞移植的患者(分别为 35 人和 50 人)在基线、移植后第 0 天和第 7 天通过定量 ELISA 和半定量 POC 检测尿液中的 L-FABP(uL-FABP)。血清肌酐(SCr)也在同一时间进行测量。对患者进行为期30天的随访,以了解其是否发生了AKI,并对其死亡率进行长达18个月的随访。采用 ROC 曲线分析和逻辑回归法评估了 uL-FABP 作为 AKI 生物标记物的敏感性和特异性,并与 sCr 的性能进行了比较。结果39%的参与者在移植后1个月内出现了AKI。异体组的 AKI 发生率高于自体 HTSC 组(57% 对 26%,P = 0.008),发生 AKI 的中位时间为 25 [9-30] 天。该组患者更年轻(中位年龄 59 岁对 63 岁,P < 0.001),主要诊断为多发性骨髓瘤的比例较低(6% 对 88%,P < 0.001)。异体组在基线、移植当天和移植后第 7 天的 uL-FABP(微克/克Cr)分别为 1.61、5.39 和 10.27,自体组分别为 0.58、4.36 和 5.14。SCr和uL-FABP水平从基线到移植后第7天均有所上升,而预测移植后基线、第0天和第7天AKI的AUC分别为0.54、0.59和0.62,预测SCr的AUC分别为0.49、0.43和0.49,预测uL-FABP的AUC分别为0.49、0.43和0.49。单变量逻辑回归显示,异基因造血干细胞移植患者(p = 0.004,95%CI [0.1;0.65])和基线肾功能受损患者(p = 0.01,95%CI [0.02,0.54])发生 AKI 的风险增加。发生 AKI 的风险还与移植后第 7 天的 SCr 水平显著相关(p = 0.03,95%CI [1;1.03])。多变量逻辑回归显示,造血干细胞移植类型是所有时间点上预测 AKI 的最有力因素,而在包括相应时间点 uL-FABP 水平的模型中,第 0 天和第 7 天的 SCr 水平也与风险增加相关。用于测量 uL-FABP 的 POC 设备与 ELISA 有相关性(p < 0.001,Spearman 'correlation' = 0.54):尿液生物标志物 uL-FABP 在所有阶段的 AKI 检测中均未显示出独立的预测价值。在这种情况下,最有力的 AKI 风险预测因素似乎是异体移植物受体和基线肾功能损害,这凸显了临床风险分层的重要性。尿液 L-FAPB 作为一种 POC 生物标记物与 ELISA 不相上下,这为简单快速的检测提供了机会。然而,LFABP 在 AKI 中的作用尚不明确,需要进一步探讨。通过快速检测 uL-FABP 进行筛查是否能预防或减轻 AKI 的严重程度尚不清楚,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信