Teprotumumab for the Treatment of Thyroid Eye Disease: Why Should We Keep Our Eyes "Wide Open"?-A Clinical and Pharmacovigilance Point of View.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Arnaud Martel, Fanny Rocher, Alexandre Gerard
{"title":"Teprotumumab for the Treatment of Thyroid Eye Disease: Why Should We Keep Our Eyes \"Wide Open\"?-A Clinical and Pharmacovigilance Point of View.","authors":"Arnaud Martel, Fanny Rocher, Alexandre Gerard","doi":"10.3390/jpm14101027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Thyroid eye disease (TED) treatment has been recently revolutionized with the approval of teprotumumab, a targeted insulin growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) inhibitor. To date, teprotumumab is the only FDA-approved drug for treating TED. In this article, we would like to temper the current enthusiasm around IGF1R inhibitors. <b>Methods:</b> critical review of the literature by independent academic practitioners. <b>Results:</b> several questions should be raised. First, \"<i>how an orphan drug has become a blockbuster with annual sales exceeding $1 billion?</i>\" Teprotumumab infusions are expensive, costing about USD 45,000 for one infusion and USD 360,000 for eight infusions in a 75 kg patient. Teprotumumab approval was based on two randomized clinical trials investigating active (clinical activity score ≥ 4) TED patients. Despite this, teprotumumab was approved by the FDA for \"the treatment of TED\" without distinguishing between active and inactive forms. The second question is as follows: \"<i>how can a new drug, compared only to a placebo, become the new standard without being compared to historically established gold standard medical or surgical treatments?</i>\" Teprotumumab has never been compared to other medical treatments in active TED nor to surgery in chronic TED. Up to 75% of patients may experience proptosis regression after treatment discontinuation. Finally, ototoxicity has emerged as a potentially devastating side effect requiring frequent monitoring. Investigation into the long-term side effects, especially in women of childbearing age, is also warranted. <b>Conclusions:</b> Teprotumumab is undoubtedly a major treatment option in TED. However, before prescribing a drug, practitioners should assess its benefit/risk ratio based on the following: (i) evidence-based medicine; (ii) their empirical experience; (iii) the cost/benefit analysis; (iv) the long-term outcomes and safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11508897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14101027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Thyroid eye disease (TED) treatment has been recently revolutionized with the approval of teprotumumab, a targeted insulin growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) inhibitor. To date, teprotumumab is the only FDA-approved drug for treating TED. In this article, we would like to temper the current enthusiasm around IGF1R inhibitors. Methods: critical review of the literature by independent academic practitioners. Results: several questions should be raised. First, "how an orphan drug has become a blockbuster with annual sales exceeding $1 billion?" Teprotumumab infusions are expensive, costing about USD 45,000 for one infusion and USD 360,000 for eight infusions in a 75 kg patient. Teprotumumab approval was based on two randomized clinical trials investigating active (clinical activity score ≥ 4) TED patients. Despite this, teprotumumab was approved by the FDA for "the treatment of TED" without distinguishing between active and inactive forms. The second question is as follows: "how can a new drug, compared only to a placebo, become the new standard without being compared to historically established gold standard medical or surgical treatments?" Teprotumumab has never been compared to other medical treatments in active TED nor to surgery in chronic TED. Up to 75% of patients may experience proptosis regression after treatment discontinuation. Finally, ototoxicity has emerged as a potentially devastating side effect requiring frequent monitoring. Investigation into the long-term side effects, especially in women of childbearing age, is also warranted. Conclusions: Teprotumumab is undoubtedly a major treatment option in TED. However, before prescribing a drug, practitioners should assess its benefit/risk ratio based on the following: (i) evidence-based medicine; (ii) their empirical experience; (iii) the cost/benefit analysis; (iv) the long-term outcomes and safety profile.

治疗甲状腺眼病的替普鲁单抗:我们为什么要 "睁大眼睛"?
目的:随着胰岛素生长因子 1 受体(IGF1R)靶向抑制剂特普鲁单抗(teprotumumab)的批准,甲状腺眼病(TED)的治疗最近发生了革命性的变化。迄今为止,特普鲁单抗是美国食品及药物管理局批准的唯一一种治疗 TED 的药物。在本文中,我们希望缓和目前围绕 IGF1R 抑制剂的热情。方法:由独立的学术从业者对文献进行批判性回顾。结果:应该提出几个问题。首先,"一个孤儿药是如何成为年销售额超过 10 亿美元的大片的?"泰普单抗输注费用昂贵,输注一次约需 45,000 美元,75 公斤的患者输注八次约需 360,000 美元。Teprotumumab的批准是基于两项随机临床试验,研究对象是活跃的(临床活动评分≥4分)TED患者。尽管如此,FDA 还是批准特普鲁单抗用于 "治疗 TED",而没有区分活动型和非活动型。第二个问题如下:"一种仅与安慰剂进行比较的新药,在没有与历史上已确立的金标准内科或外科治疗方法进行比较的情况下,如何能成为新标准?特普鲁单抗从未与其他治疗活动性TED的药物疗法进行过比较,也从未与治疗慢性TED的手术疗法进行过比较。多达 75% 的患者在停止治疗后可能会出现突眼消退。最后,耳毒性已成为一种潜在的破坏性副作用,需要经常监测。此外,还需要对长期副作用进行调查,尤其是对育龄妇女的副作用。结论特普鲁单抗无疑是治疗 TED 的主要选择。然而,在处方药物之前,医生应根据以下几点评估其效益/风险比:(i) 循证医学;(ii) 经验;(iii) 成本/效益分析;(iv) 长期疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信