Diagnostic accuracy of active pulmonary tuberculosis screening during detention admission: a systematic review.

Q3 Medicine
Stephanie Pape, Kabiru Gulma, Siddharudha Shivalli, Laurent Cleenewerck de Kiev
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of active pulmonary tuberculosis screening during detention admission: a systematic review.","authors":"Stephanie Pape, Kabiru Gulma, Siddharudha Shivalli, Laurent Cleenewerck de Kiev","doi":"10.25122/jml-2024-0155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals entering incarceration are at high risk for infectious diseases, other ill conditions, and risky behavior. Typically, the status of active pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is not known at the time of admission. Early detection and treatment are essential for effective TB control. So far, no study has compared the diagnostic accuracy of various TB screening tools in detention using a network meta-analysis (NMA). We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of active PTB screening tests upon detention admission. We searched PubMed, Global Index Medicus, the Cochrane Library electronic databases, and grey literature for publications reporting detention TB entry screening in March 2022 and January 2024. Inclusion was non-restrictive regarding time, language, location, reference standards, or screening tests. Eligible study designs comprised comparative, observational, and diagnostic studies. Publications had to report TB screening of individuals entering confinement and provide data for diagnostic accuracy calculations. The QUADAS-2 tool was designed to assess the quality of primary diagnostic accuracy studies. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022307863) and conducted without external funding. We screened a total of 2,455 records. Despite extensive searching, no studies met our inclusion criteria. However, we identified evidence revealing key differences in screening algorithm application. In conclusion, more diagnostic accuracy data on TB screening algorithms for detention admission worldwide needs to be collected. We recommend that global TB initiatives set up multi-site studies to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of TB screening on admission in low- and high-prevalence criminal justice systems. Further network meta-analyses of these studies could inform policymakers and public health experts to establish or fine-tune TB control in detention settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Life","volume":"17 7","pages":"671-681"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2024-0155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals entering incarceration are at high risk for infectious diseases, other ill conditions, and risky behavior. Typically, the status of active pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is not known at the time of admission. Early detection and treatment are essential for effective TB control. So far, no study has compared the diagnostic accuracy of various TB screening tools in detention using a network meta-analysis (NMA). We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of active PTB screening tests upon detention admission. We searched PubMed, Global Index Medicus, the Cochrane Library electronic databases, and grey literature for publications reporting detention TB entry screening in March 2022 and January 2024. Inclusion was non-restrictive regarding time, language, location, reference standards, or screening tests. Eligible study designs comprised comparative, observational, and diagnostic studies. Publications had to report TB screening of individuals entering confinement and provide data for diagnostic accuracy calculations. The QUADAS-2 tool was designed to assess the quality of primary diagnostic accuracy studies. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022307863) and conducted without external funding. We screened a total of 2,455 records. Despite extensive searching, no studies met our inclusion criteria. However, we identified evidence revealing key differences in screening algorithm application. In conclusion, more diagnostic accuracy data on TB screening algorithms for detention admission worldwide needs to be collected. We recommend that global TB initiatives set up multi-site studies to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of TB screening on admission in low- and high-prevalence criminal justice systems. Further network meta-analyses of these studies could inform policymakers and public health experts to establish or fine-tune TB control in detention settings.

拘留期间活动性肺结核筛查的诊断准确性:系统综述。
进入监狱的人是传染病、其他疾病和危险行为的高危人群。通常情况下,入狱时还不知道是否患有活动性肺结核(PTB)。早期发现和治疗对有效控制结核病至关重要。迄今为止,还没有研究使用网络荟萃分析(NMA)比较过拘留所中各种肺结核筛查工具的诊断准确性。我们的目的是调查入院时进行的活动性 PTB 筛查试验的诊断准确性。我们在 PubMed、Global Index Medicus、Cochrane Library 电子数据库和灰色文献中检索了 2022 年 3 月至 2024 年 1 月期间报道拘留所结核病入所筛查的出版物。纳入研究的时间、语言、地点、参考标准或筛查试验均不受限制。符合条件的研究设计包括比较研究、观察研究和诊断研究。刊物必须报道对进入禁闭室的人员进行结核病筛查的情况,并提供数据用于诊断准确性计算。QUADAS-2 工具旨在评估初级诊断准确性研究的质量。本系统性综述已在 PROSPERO(CRD42022307863)注册,没有外部资助。我们共筛选了 2,455 条记录。尽管进行了广泛的搜索,但没有研究符合我们的纳入标准。不过,我们发现了揭示筛查算法应用关键差异的证据。总之,需要在全球范围内收集更多关于拘留所收治肺结核筛查算法的诊断准确性数据。我们建议全球结核病倡议设立多站点研究,调查低流行率和高流行率刑事司法系统中入院结核病筛查的诊断准确性。对这些研究进行进一步的网络荟萃分析可为政策制定者和公共卫生专家提供信息,以建立或微调拘留环境中的结核病控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medicine and Life
Journal of Medicine and Life Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medicine and Life publishes peer-reviewed articles from various fields of medicine and life sciences, including original research, systematic reviews, special reports, case presentations, major medical breakthroughs and letters to the editor. The Journal focuses on current matters that lie at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and strives to present this information to inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. Papers addressing topics such as neuroprotection, neurorehabilitation, neuroplasticity, and neuroregeneration are particularly encouraged, as part of the Journal''s continuous interest in neuroscience research. The Editorial Board of the Journal of Medicine and Life is open to consider manuscripts from all levels of research and areas of biological sciences, including fundamental, experimental or clinical research and matters of public health. As part of our pledge to promote an educational and community-building environment, our issues feature sections designated to informing our readers regarding exciting international congresses, teaching courses and relevant institutional-level events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信