Which Whitening Mouthwash With Different Ingredients Is More Effective on Color and Bond Strength of Enamel?

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Elif Varli Tekingur, Fatih Bedir, Muhammet Karadas, Rahime Zeynep Erdem
{"title":"Which Whitening Mouthwash With Different Ingredients Is More Effective on Color and Bond Strength of Enamel?","authors":"Elif Varli Tekingur, Fatih Bedir, Muhammet Karadas, Rahime Zeynep Erdem","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the effects of six whitening mouthwashes on tooth color and immediate bond strength to the enamel.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Human incisors were divided into seven groups (n = 10) according to mouthwashes (R.O.C.S Black Edition White, Splat White Plus, Colgate Plax White Charcoal, Signal White Now, Listerine Advanced White, Colgate Optic White, and distilled water). After the initial color measurements, the teeth were exposed to mouthwash for 4 weeks. Then, the color measurements were repeated. Then, cylindrical composite resin blocks were immediately applied to the enamel surfaces and subjected to shear bond strength tests. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni tests (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Δ𝑏, Δ𝐿, and ΔE<sub>00</sub> values did not present significant differences among the groups. Significant differences among the groups were determined for Δ𝑎 and ΔWI<sub>D</sub> values (p < 0.05). R.O.C.S Black Edition White and Splat White Plus produced clinically acceptable color changes. Signal White Now, Splat White Plus, and Listerine Advanced White created acceptable whiteness changes. The mouthwashes did not statistically affect the bond strength compared to the distilled water (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Whitening mouthwash containing blue covarine revealed more acceptable color and whitening changes. Mouthwash containing charcoal led to the lowest enamel bond strength values.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The content of whitening mouthwashes affected the degree of tooth whitening and shear bond strength to enamel.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13349","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effects of six whitening mouthwashes on tooth color and immediate bond strength to the enamel.

Materials and methods: Human incisors were divided into seven groups (n = 10) according to mouthwashes (R.O.C.S Black Edition White, Splat White Plus, Colgate Plax White Charcoal, Signal White Now, Listerine Advanced White, Colgate Optic White, and distilled water). After the initial color measurements, the teeth were exposed to mouthwash for 4 weeks. Then, the color measurements were repeated. Then, cylindrical composite resin blocks were immediately applied to the enamel surfaces and subjected to shear bond strength tests. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni tests (α = 0.05).

Results: Δ𝑏, Δ𝐿, and ΔE00 values did not present significant differences among the groups. Significant differences among the groups were determined for Δ𝑎 and ΔWID values (p < 0.05). R.O.C.S Black Edition White and Splat White Plus produced clinically acceptable color changes. Signal White Now, Splat White Plus, and Listerine Advanced White created acceptable whiteness changes. The mouthwashes did not statistically affect the bond strength compared to the distilled water (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Whitening mouthwash containing blue covarine revealed more acceptable color and whitening changes. Mouthwash containing charcoal led to the lowest enamel bond strength values.

Clinical significance: The content of whitening mouthwashes affected the degree of tooth whitening and shear bond strength to enamel.

不同成分的美白漱口水对珐琅质的颜色和粘合强度更有效?
目的:研究六种美白漱口水对牙齿颜色和釉质即时粘接强度的影响:材料和方法:根据漱口水(R.O.C.S Black Edition White、Splat White Plus、Colgate Plax White Charcoal、Signal White Now、Listerine Advanced White、Colgate Optic White 和蒸馏水)的不同,将人类门牙分为七组(n = 10)。初次颜色测量后,牙齿在漱口水中暴露 4 周。然后,再次进行颜色测量。然后,立即在珐琅质表面涂上圆柱形复合树脂块,并进行剪切粘接强度测试。数据分析采用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Bonferroni 检验(α = 0.05)。结果:Δ𝑏、Δ𝐿 和 ΔE00 值在各组间无显著差异。Δ𝑎和ΔWID值在各组间存在显著差异(P 0.05):结论:含蓝花楹的美白漱口水显示出更容易接受的颜色和美白变化。结论:含有蓝花楹的美白漱口水显示出更可接受的颜色和美白变化,而含有木炭的漱口水则导致最低的牙釉质粘结强度值:临床意义:美白漱口水的成分会影响牙齿的美白程度和与珐琅质的剪切粘合强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信