Determination of SRPA and adiposity measures and its association with glycemic status in type 2 diabetics having high mean HbA1c in a private clinic of a city in west India.
Jayesh D Solanki, Rahul Vaghasiya, Isha Sharma, Jagdish B Patel
{"title":"Determination of SRPA and adiposity measures and its association with glycemic status in type 2 diabetics having high mean HbA1c in a private clinic of a city in west India.","authors":"Jayesh D Solanki, Rahul Vaghasiya, Isha Sharma, Jagdish B Patel","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_205_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Indian type 2 diabetics (T2D) is known for poor disease control on which self-reported physical activity (SRPA) and optimum body composition have positive impact. We determined prevalence of SRPA and general/visceral obesity and its impact on HbA1c-based glycemia.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>By a cross-sectional study conducted on 200 T2Ds in a private clinic, HbA1c-based glycemic status, WHO questionnaire-based SRPA, BMI-based general obesity, and bipolar bioelectrical impedance-based visceral obesity were evaluated. SRPA and obesity were compared and associated with glycaemic status keeping mean HbA1c as cutoff.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Mean age, male%, mean duration of T2D, mean BMI, mean HbA1c, and SRPA prevalence were 54 years, 42.5%, 4.82 years, 25.49, 8.69%, and 61.5%, respectively. Comparison of groups based on either SRPA or BMI (cutoff 25) showed better HbA1c with the presence of SRPA and BMI <25. Physical inactivity imposed odds risk of 3.44 for visceral fat (VF) ≥10% and odds risk of 2.6 for more than mean HbA1c with statistical significances. VF ≥10% imposed odds risk of 4 for higher than mean HbA1c. Physical inactivity and visceral obesity together imposed ⅓rd prevalence of better glycaemic value, while physical activity and controlled visceral obesity yielded ¾th prevalence of good glycaemic value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In T2D with poor glycaemic status and moderately prevalent physical activity, we found strongly significant association of SRPA and controlled body adiposity with HbA1c-based glycaemic status. It reaffirms physical activity and control of central obesity as forerunners of better glycaemic status and calls for further studies having vertical follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504823/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_205_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Indian type 2 diabetics (T2D) is known for poor disease control on which self-reported physical activity (SRPA) and optimum body composition have positive impact. We determined prevalence of SRPA and general/visceral obesity and its impact on HbA1c-based glycemia.
Methodology: By a cross-sectional study conducted on 200 T2Ds in a private clinic, HbA1c-based glycemic status, WHO questionnaire-based SRPA, BMI-based general obesity, and bipolar bioelectrical impedance-based visceral obesity were evaluated. SRPA and obesity were compared and associated with glycaemic status keeping mean HbA1c as cutoff.
Result: Mean age, male%, mean duration of T2D, mean BMI, mean HbA1c, and SRPA prevalence were 54 years, 42.5%, 4.82 years, 25.49, 8.69%, and 61.5%, respectively. Comparison of groups based on either SRPA or BMI (cutoff 25) showed better HbA1c with the presence of SRPA and BMI <25. Physical inactivity imposed odds risk of 3.44 for visceral fat (VF) ≥10% and odds risk of 2.6 for more than mean HbA1c with statistical significances. VF ≥10% imposed odds risk of 4 for higher than mean HbA1c. Physical inactivity and visceral obesity together imposed ⅓rd prevalence of better glycaemic value, while physical activity and controlled visceral obesity yielded ¾th prevalence of good glycaemic value.
Conclusion: In T2D with poor glycaemic status and moderately prevalent physical activity, we found strongly significant association of SRPA and controlled body adiposity with HbA1c-based glycaemic status. It reaffirms physical activity and control of central obesity as forerunners of better glycaemic status and calls for further studies having vertical follow-up.