Bacteriological profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of bloodstream infections from a teaching institution in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, North India.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Shefali Gupta, Mukesh Shukla, Mahendra Meena, Soumyabrata Nag, Sana Islahi, Sweta Singh, Akshat Srivastav, Anirudh Mukherjee
{"title":"Bacteriological profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of bloodstream infections from a teaching institution in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, North India.","authors":"Shefali Gupta, Mukesh Shukla, Mahendra Meena, Soumyabrata Nag, Sana Islahi, Sweta Singh, Akshat Srivastav, Anirudh Mukherjee","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1994_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bloodstream infections (BSIs), encompassing both self-limiting bacteremia and potentially fatal septicaemia, make up the majority of healthcare-associated ailments worldwide. The organisms encountered are mostly multidrug-resistant (MDROs), leading to increased hospital stays. Our study aims to collect data about blood culture isolates from a medical college in eastern Uttar Pradesh, India.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of blood culture isolates obtained at our laboratory for ten months from patients with clinical suspicion of sepsis or infection with the possibility of haematogenous spread was done. We only considered consecutive and patient-specific, non-duplicate isolates. Blood samples were initially incubated in BacT/ALERT® and then manually processed once they flagged positive.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,033 blood samples were received, of which 217 (21%) showed the growth of a pathogenic organism. The positivity rate varied significantly across different age groups, locations, and departments (<i>P</i> value < 0.001). It was higher among in-patients, those with central venous access, and patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> [n <i>=</i> 105, 48.38%] was isolated most commonly, with a high prevalence of methicillin resistance (83%). <i>Enterococcus</i> demonstrated a high degree of resistance. MDROs accounted for 68% of the detected Gram-negatives.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study comprehensively analyses blood culture results from a diverse group of patients and emphasizes the association between risk factors and positive blood cultures. Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates demonstrated low sensitivity to common antibiotics, urging vigilant monitoring and specific therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study reveals important insights guiding clinical practices, antimicrobial stewardship, and infection control strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1994_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bloodstream infections (BSIs), encompassing both self-limiting bacteremia and potentially fatal septicaemia, make up the majority of healthcare-associated ailments worldwide. The organisms encountered are mostly multidrug-resistant (MDROs), leading to increased hospital stays. Our study aims to collect data about blood culture isolates from a medical college in eastern Uttar Pradesh, India.

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of blood culture isolates obtained at our laboratory for ten months from patients with clinical suspicion of sepsis or infection with the possibility of haematogenous spread was done. We only considered consecutive and patient-specific, non-duplicate isolates. Blood samples were initially incubated in BacT/ALERT® and then manually processed once they flagged positive.

Results: A total of 1,033 blood samples were received, of which 217 (21%) showed the growth of a pathogenic organism. The positivity rate varied significantly across different age groups, locations, and departments (P value < 0.001). It was higher among in-patients, those with central venous access, and patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Staphylococcus aureus [n = 105, 48.38%] was isolated most commonly, with a high prevalence of methicillin resistance (83%). Enterococcus demonstrated a high degree of resistance. MDROs accounted for 68% of the detected Gram-negatives.

Discussion: This study comprehensively analyses blood culture results from a diverse group of patients and emphasizes the association between risk factors and positive blood cultures. Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates demonstrated low sensitivity to common antibiotics, urging vigilant monitoring and specific therapy.

Conclusion: Our study reveals important insights guiding clinical practices, antimicrobial stewardship, and infection control strategies.

印度北部北方邦东部一所教学机构血流感染的细菌学概况和抗生素敏感性模式。
简介血流感染(BSI)包括自限性菌血症和可能致命的败血症,在全球医疗相关疾病中占大多数。所感染的微生物大多具有多重耐药性(MDROs),导致住院时间延长。我们的研究旨在收集印度北方邦东部一所医学院的血液培养分离物数据:我们对实验室 10 个月来从临床怀疑患有败血症或感染并有可能经血液传播的患者身上获得的血液培养分离物进行了回顾性分析。我们只考虑连续的、患者特异的、非重复的分离株。血液样本首先在 BacT/ALERT® 中培养,一旦呈阳性,再进行人工处理:共收到 1,033 份血液样本,其中 217 份(21%)显示有病原体生长。不同年龄组、不同地点和不同科室的阳性率差异很大(P 值小于 0.001)。住院病人、使用中心静脉通路的病人和糖尿病(DM)患者的阳性率较高。金黄色葡萄球菌[n = 105,48.38%]是最常见的分离菌种,对甲氧西林耐药率较高(83%)。肠球菌的耐药性也很高。在检出的革兰氏阴性菌中,MDRO 占 68%:本研究全面分析了来自不同患者群体的血培养结果,并强调了风险因素与阳性血培养之间的关联。革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性分离物对普通抗生素的敏感性较低,因此需要警惕监测和特殊治疗:我们的研究揭示了指导临床实践、抗菌药物管理和感染控制策略的重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信