Assessment of the pattern of antibiotic resistance among microorganisms isolated from the culture medium prepared from hospitalized patients: A retrospective study.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Mohammad Ali Davarpanah, Sara Vares Vazirian
{"title":"Assessment of the pattern of antibiotic resistance among microorganisms isolated from the culture medium prepared from hospitalized patients: A retrospective study.","authors":"Mohammad Ali Davarpanah, Sara Vares Vazirian","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_67_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibiotic resistance has become quite a challenge in the treatment of bacterial infections in the world. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the pattern of antibiotic resistance among microorganisms isolated from the culture medium prepared from hospitalized patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The type of study was cross-sectional descriptive. The antibiotic resistance pattern of positive samples collected from patients who got hospitalized in Shahid Faghihi hospital of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences between 2020 and 2021 using the disc diffusion method according to CLSI standards was measured. Then the data were entered into SPSS version 22 software and analyzed with appropriate statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of all positive samples, 69.7% were Gram-negative and the rest were Gram-positive. The most frequent Gram-negative bacteria were <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> (31.4%), <i>Escherichia coli</i> (25.3), and <i>Klebsiella pneumonia</i> (21.2%), and the most frequent Gram-positive bacteria were <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (79%), <i>Coagulase-negative staphylococci</i> (15.4%), and <i>Enterococcus</i> (3.6%). The resistance rate of <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>, <i>Klebsiella pneumonia</i>, and <i>Pseudomonas aeroginosa</i> against ciprofloxacin was 91.4%, 74.3%, and 52.3%; the resistance rate against gentamicin was 90.5%, 54.3%, and 43.9%; the resistance rate against Piperacillin-Tazobactam was 85.6%, 65%, and 43.1%; the resistance rate against imipenem was 97.1%, 57.9%, and 65.4%; and the resistance rate against colostin was 1.9%, 0%, and 3.4%, respectively. The resistance rate of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> against cefoxotin and vancomycin was 42.7% and 2.8%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Finally, we concluded from this study that microorganisms isolated from patients have developed resistance to many commonly used antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_67_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antibiotic resistance has become quite a challenge in the treatment of bacterial infections in the world. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the pattern of antibiotic resistance among microorganisms isolated from the culture medium prepared from hospitalized patients.

Methods: The type of study was cross-sectional descriptive. The antibiotic resistance pattern of positive samples collected from patients who got hospitalized in Shahid Faghihi hospital of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences between 2020 and 2021 using the disc diffusion method according to CLSI standards was measured. Then the data were entered into SPSS version 22 software and analyzed with appropriate statistical tests.

Results: Of all positive samples, 69.7% were Gram-negative and the rest were Gram-positive. The most frequent Gram-negative bacteria were Acinetobacter baumannii (31.4%), Escherichia coli (25.3), and Klebsiella pneumonia (21.2%), and the most frequent Gram-positive bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus (79%), Coagulase-negative staphylococci (15.4%), and Enterococcus (3.6%). The resistance rate of Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumonia, and Pseudomonas aeroginosa against ciprofloxacin was 91.4%, 74.3%, and 52.3%; the resistance rate against gentamicin was 90.5%, 54.3%, and 43.9%; the resistance rate against Piperacillin-Tazobactam was 85.6%, 65%, and 43.1%; the resistance rate against imipenem was 97.1%, 57.9%, and 65.4%; and the resistance rate against colostin was 1.9%, 0%, and 3.4%, respectively. The resistance rate of Staphylococcus aureus against cefoxotin and vancomycin was 42.7% and 2.8%, respectively.

Conclusion: Finally, we concluded from this study that microorganisms isolated from patients have developed resistance to many commonly used antibiotics.

评估从住院病人培养基中分离出的微生物的抗生素耐药性模式:一项回顾性研究。
背景:抗生素耐药性已成为全球细菌感染治疗中的一大挑战。因此,本研究旨在调查从住院病人培养基中分离出的微生物的抗生素耐药性模式:研究类型为横断面描述性研究。根据 CLSI 标准,采用光盘扩散法对 2020 年至 2021 年期间在设拉子医科大学 Shahid Faghihi 医院住院的患者采集的阳性样本进行抗生素耐药性模式测定。然后将数据输入 SPSS 22 版软件,并进行相应的统计检验分析:在所有阳性样本中,69.7%为革兰氏阴性菌,其余为革兰氏阳性菌。最常见的革兰氏阴性菌是鲍曼不动杆菌(31.4%)、大肠埃希菌(25.3%)和肺炎克雷伯菌(21.2%),最常见的革兰氏阳性菌是金黄色葡萄球菌(79%)、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(15.4%)和肠球菌(3.6%)。鲍曼不动杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌对环丙沙星的耐药率分别为 91.4%、74.3% 和 52.3%;对庆大霉素的耐药率分别为 90.5%、54.3% 和 43.9%;对哌拉西林-他唑巴坦的耐药率分别为 85.6%、65% 和 43.1%;对亚胺培南的耐药率分别为 97.1%、57.9% 和 65.4%;对可乐定的耐药率分别为 1.9%、0% 和 3.4%。金黄色葡萄球菌对头孢噻肟和万古霉素的耐药率分别为 42.7% 和 2.8%:最后,我们从这项研究中得出结论,从患者体内分离出的微生物对许多常用抗生素产生了耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信