Are we really hesitant toward routine immunization: Findings from a cross-sectional study in urban area in the tribal dominant state of India.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Kumari A Kiran, Anit Kujur, Dewesh Kumar, Vidya Sagar, Neelanjali Kumari, Prerna Anand, Santosh K Soren, Kumari J Ragini, Manisha Kujur, Surendra Sahu
{"title":"Are we really hesitant toward routine immunization: Findings from a cross-sectional study in urban area in the tribal dominant state of India.","authors":"Kumari A Kiran, Anit Kujur, Dewesh Kumar, Vidya Sagar, Neelanjali Kumari, Prerna Anand, Santosh K Soren, Kumari J Ragini, Manisha Kujur, Surendra Sahu","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_423_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy has been inching up and its root cause lies in the factors that influence the vaccination. The present study was conducted to find out the proportion and factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy for routine childhood vaccinations in the slum population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A community-based cross-sectional study was carried out among 210 children between the age group of 0 and 59 months residing in the urban slums of Ranchi in 2021. Data were collected during the household visit by interviewing the parents using a predesigned pretested interview schedule which was developed based on the validated version of the vaccine hesitancy survey questionnaire originally developed by the World Health Organization Strategic Advisory Group of Experts' working group on vaccine hesitancy. Associations between variables were analyzed using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 210 children whose parents had given consent were included in our study. The majority of the families, 188 (89.5%), were not hesitant while only 22 (10.5%) were vaccine hesitant. Tribal children and unreserved category children had adjusted odds ratio of 4.41 (95% CI, 1.61-45.46) and 7.75 (95% CI, 1.07-56.08) for the delay as against their reference category.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most of the children were vaccinated in our study area and the families have shown confidence in vaccines. Although there were delays in vaccination and the reasons for the delays must be addressed to prevent these vaccine-hesitant populations from turning into vaccine-refusal population. Uniformity in vaccination days in different health facilities in slum areas, appropriate antenatal information, and counseling regarding childhood vaccinations, widespread awareness, and improving mother's education can help address the issue of vaccine hesitancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":"13 9","pages":"4001-4007"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_423_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vaccine hesitancy has been inching up and its root cause lies in the factors that influence the vaccination. The present study was conducted to find out the proportion and factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy for routine childhood vaccinations in the slum population.

Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was carried out among 210 children between the age group of 0 and 59 months residing in the urban slums of Ranchi in 2021. Data were collected during the household visit by interviewing the parents using a predesigned pretested interview schedule which was developed based on the validated version of the vaccine hesitancy survey questionnaire originally developed by the World Health Organization Strategic Advisory Group of Experts' working group on vaccine hesitancy. Associations between variables were analyzed using logistic regression.

Results: A total of 210 children whose parents had given consent were included in our study. The majority of the families, 188 (89.5%), were not hesitant while only 22 (10.5%) were vaccine hesitant. Tribal children and unreserved category children had adjusted odds ratio of 4.41 (95% CI, 1.61-45.46) and 7.75 (95% CI, 1.07-56.08) for the delay as against their reference category.

Conclusions: Most of the children were vaccinated in our study area and the families have shown confidence in vaccines. Although there were delays in vaccination and the reasons for the delays must be addressed to prevent these vaccine-hesitant populations from turning into vaccine-refusal population. Uniformity in vaccination days in different health facilities in slum areas, appropriate antenatal information, and counseling regarding childhood vaccinations, widespread awareness, and improving mother's education can help address the issue of vaccine hesitancy.

我们真的对常规免疫接种犹豫不决吗?印度部落聚居邦城市地区横断面研究的结果。
背景:疫苗接种犹豫不决的现象日益严重,其根本原因在于影响疫苗接种的因素。本研究旨在了解导致贫民窟人群对儿童常规疫苗接种犹豫不决的比例和因素:2021 年,对居住在兰契城市贫民窟的 210 名 0 至 59 个月大的儿童进行了社区横断面研究。该调查表是根据世界卫生组织战略咨询专家组疫苗接种犹豫不决问题工作组最初制定的疫苗接种犹豫不决调查问卷的有效版本编制的。变量之间的关联采用逻辑回归法进行分析:我们的研究共纳入了 210 名得到家长同意的儿童。大多数家庭(188 个家庭(89.5%)不犹豫,只有 22 个家庭(10.5%)犹豫接种。部落儿童和非保留类别儿童与参照类别儿童相比,延迟接种的调整几率比分别为 4.41(95% CI,1.61-45.46)和 7.75(95% CI,1.07-56.08):在我们的研究地区,大多数儿童都接种了疫苗,而且家庭对疫苗也很有信心。尽管存在疫苗接种延迟的情况,但必须解决延迟接种的原因,以防止这些对疫苗犹豫不决的人群变成拒绝接种疫苗的人群。统一贫民区不同医疗机构的疫苗接种日、适当的产前信息和儿童疫苗接种咨询、广泛的宣传以及提高母亲的教育水平都有助于解决疫苗接种犹豫的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信