The LTAR Grazing Land Common Experiment at Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Philip Heilman, Steven R. Archer, C. Jason Williams, Russell L. Scott, David C. Goodrich, Chandra Holifield Collins, Adam T. Naito, Guillermo E. Ponce-Campos
{"title":"The LTAR Grazing Land Common Experiment at Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed","authors":"Philip Heilman,&nbsp;Steven R. Archer,&nbsp;C. Jason Williams,&nbsp;Russell L. Scott,&nbsp;David C. Goodrich,&nbsp;Chandra Holifield Collins,&nbsp;Adam T. Naito,&nbsp;Guillermo E. Ponce-Campos","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.20643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed (WGEW) Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network common experiment addresses the aspirational practice of brush management (BM) to reverse the prevailing condition of woody plant encroachment (WPE) and increase perennial native grass production. Across the western United States, the decision to implement BM includes consideration of management objectives, cost, and the expected impact on a diverse suite of ecosystem services. Maintaining or restoring grass cover will help meet the LTAR sustainable production, economic, and social goals, and averting degradation will meet environmental goals. This common experiment, focused on hydrologic and erosion impacts of BM, aims to inform land management decisions on three major plant communities in the Southwestern United States: creosote bush (<i>Larrea tridentata</i>), mesquite (<i>Prosopis velutina</i>), and pinyon–juniper (PJ, <i>Pinus</i> and <i>Juniperus</i> spp.). On the WGEW, applying tebuthiuron pellets to creosote bush increased grass cover and reduced runoff and erosion. The 2016 BM experiment on the Santa Rita Experimental Range applied a commonly used liquid herbicide cocktail but achieved only 7% mortality on mesquite, probably because of the timing of the aerial application. Experiments manipulating rainfall amount and intensity on plots receiving fire, chemical, or mechanical BM treatments on PJ communities aim to improve process representation in simulation models. The deliverables of these BM experiments will be to (i) improve the performance of runoff and erosion models, (ii) enhance our ability to identify areas most at risk from reduced hydrologic function and soil erosion after shrub proliferation, and (iii) better predict how landscapes will respond to BM interventions. Ranchers, land management agencies, and watershed conservation organizations will benefit from training and availability of improved tools to focus treatments on areas where greatest net benefits might be realized.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":"53 6","pages":"1037-1047"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeq2.20643","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeq2.20643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed (WGEW) Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network common experiment addresses the aspirational practice of brush management (BM) to reverse the prevailing condition of woody plant encroachment (WPE) and increase perennial native grass production. Across the western United States, the decision to implement BM includes consideration of management objectives, cost, and the expected impact on a diverse suite of ecosystem services. Maintaining or restoring grass cover will help meet the LTAR sustainable production, economic, and social goals, and averting degradation will meet environmental goals. This common experiment, focused on hydrologic and erosion impacts of BM, aims to inform land management decisions on three major plant communities in the Southwestern United States: creosote bush (Larrea tridentata), mesquite (Prosopis velutina), and pinyon–juniper (PJ, Pinus and Juniperus spp.). On the WGEW, applying tebuthiuron pellets to creosote bush increased grass cover and reduced runoff and erosion. The 2016 BM experiment on the Santa Rita Experimental Range applied a commonly used liquid herbicide cocktail but achieved only 7% mortality on mesquite, probably because of the timing of the aerial application. Experiments manipulating rainfall amount and intensity on plots receiving fire, chemical, or mechanical BM treatments on PJ communities aim to improve process representation in simulation models. The deliverables of these BM experiments will be to (i) improve the performance of runoff and erosion models, (ii) enhance our ability to identify areas most at risk from reduced hydrologic function and soil erosion after shrub proliferation, and (iii) better predict how landscapes will respond to BM interventions. Ranchers, land management agencies, and watershed conservation organizations will benefit from training and availability of improved tools to focus treatments on areas where greatest net benefits might be realized.

Abstract Image

核桃沟实验流域的 LTAR 牧场共同实验。
核桃沟实验流域(WGEW)长期农业生态系统研究(LTAR)网络共同实验旨在解决灌木丛管理(BM)的理想实践问题,以扭转木本植物侵占(WPE)的普遍状况并增加多年生原生草的产量。在整个美国西部,实施灌木管理的决定包括对管理目标、成本以及对各种生态系统服务的预期影响的考虑。保持或恢复草地覆盖将有助于实现 LTAR 可持续生产、经济和社会目标,而避免退化则可实现环境目标。这项共同实验的重点是 BM 对水文和侵蚀的影响,旨在为美国西南部三个主要植物群落的土地管理决策提供信息:creosote bush(Larrea tridentata)、mesquite(Prosopis velutina)和pinyon-juniper(PJ,Pinus 和 Juniperus spp.)。在 WGEW 上,对creosote 灌木施用特丁噻草隆颗粒增加了草地覆盖率,减少了径流和侵蚀。2016 年在圣塔丽塔实验场进行的 BM 试验使用了常用的液体除草剂鸡尾酒,但对介壳虫的死亡率仅为 7%,这可能与空中施药的时机有关。在对 PJ 群落进行火烧、化学或机械 BM 处理的地块上操纵降雨量和强度的实验旨在改进模拟模型中的过程表示。这些 BM 实验的成果将包括:(i) 提高径流和侵蚀模型的性能;(ii) 增强我们识别灌木增殖后水文功能和土壤侵蚀降低风险最大地区的能力;(iii) 更好地预测景观将如何对 BM 干预措施做出反应。牧场主、土地管理机构和流域保护组织将从培训和改进工具的提供中获益,从而将处理重点放在可能实现最大净效益的区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of environmental quality
Journal of environmental quality 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring. Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信